Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease of the CNS in which the interaction between genetic and environmental factors plays an important role in disease pathogenesis. Although environmental factors account for 70% of disease risk, the exact environmental factors associated with MS are unknown. Recently, gut microbiota has emerged as a potential missing environmental factor linked with the pathobiology of MS. Yet, how genetic factors, such as HLA class II gene(s), interact with gut microbiota and influence MS is unclear. In the current study, we investigated whether HLA class II genes that regulate experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and MS susceptibility also influence gut microbiota. Previously, we have shown that HLA-DR3 transgenic mice lacking endogenous mouse class II genes (AE-KO) were susceptible to myelin proteolipid protein (91–110)–induced EAE, an animal model of MS, whereas AE-KO.HLA-DQ8 transgenic mice were resistant. Surprisingly, HLA-DR3.DQ8 double transgenic mice showed higher disease prevalence and severity compared with HLA-DR3 mice. Gut microbiota analysis showed that HLA-DR3, HLA-DQ8, and HLA-DR3.DQ8 double transgenic mice microbiota are compositionally different from AE-KO mice. Within HLA class II transgenic mice, the microbiota of HLA-DQ8 mice were more similar to HLA-DR3.DQ8 than HLA-DR3. As the presence of DQ8 on an HLA-DR3 background increases disease severity, our data suggests that HLA-DQ8–specific microbiota may contribute to disease severity in HLA-DR3.DQ8 mice. Altogether, our study provides evidence that the HLA-DR and -DQ genes linked to specific gut microbiota contribute to EAE susceptibility or resistance in a transgenic animal model of MS.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, autoimmune inflammatory demyelinating disease of the CNS resulting from aberrant CD4 T cell immune response to a number of myelin Ags, including proteolipid protein (PLP), and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (1, 2). The cause of MS is poorly understood, but collective evidence suggests that the interaction of both genetic and environmental factors plays an important role (3). Furthermore, recent studies showed a greater consensus on the contribution of gene–environment interactions (GxE) in the pathogenesis of MS (46). Genetic factors account for ∼30% of disease risk as determined from studies of identical twins (7). In addition, environmental factors account for 70% of disease risk (8). However, how genetic and environmental factors are linked with a predisposition to induce MS or protect from it is unknown.

Among all the genetic factors associated with MS susceptibility, the strongest association has been found with MHC genes. MHC genes are among the most polymorphic genes in vertebrates (9), also known in humans as the HLA genes. Previous studies have reported that individuals with HLA-DR2/HLA-DQ6, HLA-DR3/HLA-DQ2, and HLA-DR4/HLA-DQ8 class II haplotypes have an increased frequency of MS (10, 11). Although a direct role of HLA-DR alleles in MS has been elucidated, the contribution of HLA-DQ alleles in disease pathogenesis is not known. Human studies have shown that HLA-DQ alleles may play a modulatory role in MS progression (12, 13). Using single transgenic mice expressing HLA class II genes, we showed that although both HLA-DR3 and HLA-DQ8 were able to recognize and mount a CD4 T cell response to PLP91–110, only HLA-DR3 transgenic mice were susceptible to myelin PLP91–110–induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), whereas HLA-DQ8 (DQB1*0302) transgenic mice were resistant (14, 15). The CD4 T cells from HLA-DR3/HLA-DQ8 double transgenic mice also recognized and proliferated to PLP91–110 peptide. However, the HLA-DR3/HLA-DQ8 double transgenic mice showed higher disease prevalence and severity (14, 15), suggesting that the disease-resistant HLA-DQ8 allele may synergize with HLA-DR3 to modulate the disease severity and progression. We have also shown that HLA-DQ8–induced IL-17 plays a role in modulating disease HLA-DR3.DQ8 transgenic mice. As gut microbiota has been shown to play a central role in the development of IL-17–producing CD4 T cells (16), it is possible that HLA-DQ8 modulate disease through its influence on gut microbiota.

Although environmental factors account for 70% of MS risk, the identification of an exact environmental factor associated with MS remains unidentified. We and others have shown that the gut microbiota are an important environmental factor linked with the etiopathogenesis of MS (1722). The consensus of these studies is that MS patients exhibit gut dysbiosis, i.e., a change in the composition of the gut microbiota community characterized by an increase in harmful bacteria (pathobionts) and a decrease in beneficial bacteria. A healthy gut microbiota helps to maintain the healthy state of the host through multiple ways, including food metabolism, maintenance of intestinal barrier, energy homeostasis, inhibition of colonization by pathogenic organisms, regulation of host physiology, and shaping of immune responses (2326). Change in gut microbiota because of various important endogenous (genetic factors) and exogenous factors (diets, antibiotics and other drugs, lifestyle, and smoking) results in alterations in its metabolites’ synthesis and perturbation of normal homeostasis, even leading to intestinal and systemic disorders (2729).

Although prior studies have reported a role of MHC genes in gut microbiota dysbiosis (3032), the importance of HLA-DQ8 gene in modulating HLA-DR3 microbiome has not been studied previously. In the current study, we investigated whether changes in HLA class II molecules from HLA-DQ8 to HLA-DR3 influences gut microbiota. Additionally, we ask whether the HLA-DQ8 gene can modulate gut microbiota of HLA-DR3 transgenic mice and modulate disease severity. We found that the gut microbiota of MHC class II genes knockout (AE-KO) mice differ from HLA-DR3, HLA-DQ8, and HLA-DR3.DQ8 double transgenic mice. We also further observed that the gut microbiota of HLA-DR3 mice are different from that of HLA-DQ8. Furthermore, our results showed that although HLA-DQ8 confers resistance to EAE, its shared microbiota with HLA-DR3/HLA-DQ8 double transgenic mice increase disease severity. Therefore, our study demonstrates an important role of the HLA-DQ8 and HLA-DR3 genes in shaping gut microbiota and the HLA-DQ8 gene’s influence on the gut microbiota of HLA-DR3 transgenic mice.

AE-KO mice

AE-KO mice were originally generated by Mathis and Benoist (33). Briefly, AE-KO mice lack all four conventional MHC class II genes (Aα, Aβ, Eα, and Eβ) because of a large (80 kb) deletion of the entire mouse class II region. Embryonic stem cells with deleted MHC class II locus were injected into C57BL/6 blastocysts following standard procedures (34). Chimeras were then crossed with C57BL/6 mice to generate AE-KO mice, which were then interbred to generate homozygous AE-KO mice and maintained in homozygous conditions for a prolonged period by interbreeding.

HLA-DQ8. AE-KO transgenic mice

Generation of DQ8 transgenic mice on B10 background was achieved as follows. Briefly, cosmids H11A (30-kb DNA) and ×10A (38-kb DNA fragment), which contain the DQA*0301 and DQB*0302 genes, respectively, were microinjected into (CBA/J. B10.M) F2 embryos, as previously described (35). Transgene-positive founders were identified by Southern blot analysis of tail DNA and subsequently mated to B10.M mice. The HLA-DQ8 transgenes were crossed with AE-KO mice to generate HLA-DQ8.AE-KO transgenic mice (36). Animals from F1 cross were genotyped by PCR to select mice positive for DQ8 genes and negative for endogenous MHC class II genes. Mice with the correct genotype were intercrossed and maintained in homozygous conditions by prolonged interbreeding.

AE-KO. HLA-DR3 transgenic mice

Generation of transgenic mice expressing HLA-DR3 (DRB1*0301) (gift from Dr. Gunter Hammerling, Heidelberg, Germany) has been described previously (37). Briefly, 6 kb NdeI fragment of an HLA-DRA genomic construct and a 24 kb ClaI × SalI fragment containing the HLA-DRB gene of DRBI*0301 were coinjected into fertilized eggs from (C57B1/6 × DBA/2) F1 donors mated with C57BL/6j males, as described previously (37). Transgene-positive founders were identified by Southern blot analysis of tail DNA and subsequently mated to B10.M mice. The HLA-DQ8 transgenes were crossed with AE-KO mice to generate HLA-DR3.AE-KO transgenic mice. Mice from F1 cross were genotyped by PCR to select for mice positive for DR3 genes and negative for endogenous MHC class II genes. Mice with the correct genotype were intercrossed and maintained in homozygous conditions by interbreeding.

DR3.DQ8 transgenic mice

The homozygous HLA-DQ8.AE-KO mice were mated with the homozygous HLA.DR3.AE-KO mice to obtain the HLA-DR3.DQ8.AE-KO double transgenic mice lines (14). All the HLA-DR3.DQ8.AE-KO mice used in the study were from F1 cross between HLA-DR3 and HLA-DQ8 transgenic mice. Double transgenic mice were genotyped to select pups positive for both HLA-DR3 and HLA-DQ8 genes.

HLA transgenic as well as control AE-KO mice strains were maintained in the animal facility at the University of Iowa. Eight- to twelve-wk-old male and female mice from HLA class II transgenic strains or AE-KO control were used in this study. For simplicity, these mice strains were referred as HLA-DR3, HLA-DQ8, HLA-DR3.DQ8, and AE-KO mice throughout the manuscript. All experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Iowa, and animals were maintained in accordance with National Institutes of Health and institutional guidelines.

Mouse fecal samples were collected from naive HLA-DR3, HLA-DQ8, HLA-DR3.DQ8 transgenic mice, and AE-KO mice groups. Microbial DNA extraction, 16S amplicon (V3–V4 region), and sequencing were done as described previously (38). Raw 16S sequence data were processed by R script dada2 to generate amplicon sequence variants, which were then assigned taxonomies using a naive Bayesian classifier with the Silva database as a reference. Functional profiling of these bacterial communities was then performed using PICRUSt2 (39) to generate pathway abundance tables for the samples.

Analysis of these data were then conducted using online microbiome tools METAGENassist (40) and MicrobiomeAnalyst (41), as well as in-house scripts. MicrobiomeAnalyst was used to generate relative abundance bar graphs as well as to perform linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) analysis. METAGENassist was used for ordination of the data and generation of principal components for analysis (PCA). Differential abundance analysis for taxonomic and pathway data were performed using nonparametric tests (Wilcoxon signed-rank test for two groups and Kruskal–Wallis test for ≥3 groups) and false discovery rate (FDR) adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini–Hochberg algorithm.

AE-KO, HLA-DQ8, HLA-DR3 and HLA-DR3.DQ8 transgenic mice (8 to 12 wk old) were immunized s.c. in both flanks using 25 µg of PLP91–110 peptides (GenScript, Piscataway, NJ) that were emulsified in CFA containing Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra (100 μg/mouse; Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD). Pertussis toxin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO; 80 ng) was administered i.p. at days 0 and 2 postimmunization. Mice were observed daily for clinical disease up to day 19. Disease severity was scored according to the standard 0–5 scoring system described previously (42). Briefly, this scoring is 0, normal; 1, loss of tail tonicity; 2, hind limb weakness; 3, hind limb paralysis; 4, complete hind limb paralysis and forelimb paralysis or weakness; and 5, moribund/death.

To analyze the effect of HLA polymorphism on EAE, we immunized AE-KO, HLA-DR3, HLA-DQ8, and HLA-DR3.DQ8 mice with PLP91–110 peptide (43). The HLA-DR3 mice began showing clinical signs of EAE disease on day 11 postimmunization, with a steadily increasing average EAE score that reached around 2.8 ± 0.4 by day 19 (Fig. 1A). In contrast, no disease was observed in mice either lacking endogenous MHC class II (AE-KO) or expressing HLA-DQ8. However, the HLA-DR3.DQ8 double transgenic mice began showing symptoms at day 9 postimmunization, and disease severity worsened quickly, reaching around 4.3 ± 0.4 by day 19 (Fig. 1A). (Fig. 1B further demonstrates the significant severity of disease, showing a mean cumulative EAE score over three times higher in the HLA-DR3.DQ8 group compared with the HLA-DR3 group.

FIGURE 1.

PLP91–110–induced EAE in AE-KO, HLA-DQ8, HLA-DR3, and HLA-DR3.DQ8 transgenic mice.

(A) Daily average EAE scores of AE-KO, HLA-DQ8, HLA-DR3, and HLA-DR3.DQ8 mice 19 d after immunization. The p values were determined by multiple t tests. (B) Averaged cumulative EAE score for both groups of mice across all 19 d. The p value was determined by Mann–Whitney unpaired U test (B).

FIGURE 1.

PLP91–110–induced EAE in AE-KO, HLA-DQ8, HLA-DR3, and HLA-DR3.DQ8 transgenic mice.

(A) Daily average EAE scores of AE-KO, HLA-DQ8, HLA-DR3, and HLA-DR3.DQ8 mice 19 d after immunization. The p values were determined by multiple t tests. (B) Averaged cumulative EAE score for both groups of mice across all 19 d. The p value was determined by Mann–Whitney unpaired U test (B).

Close modal

To characterize the relationship between the HLA polymorphisms and microbiome composition, DNA was extracted from fecal samples of AE-KO (n = 16; 8 male and 8 female), HLA-DQ8 (n = 12; 5 male and 7 female), HLA-DR3 (n = 18; 9 male and 9 female), and HLA-DR3.DQ8 (n = 15; 7 male and 8 female) mice. The V3–V4 region of 16S rRNA was then amplified and sequenced, and the sequence data were processed through the open access, R-based dada2 pipeline to perform sequence quality checks, trimming, merging of paired reads, alignment, and taxonomy assignment of the aligned sequences. The resultant median read depth was 38085, ranging from 5146 to 99,124.

α-Diversity analysis for genus richness (Chao1 index) showed significantly decreased richness in AE-KO mice versus the other three groups (p values < 0.03) (Fig. 2A). There was no significant difference in α-diversity among HLA-DQ8, HLA-DR3, and HLA-DR3.DQ8. Euclidean distance–based β-diversity analysis at the genus level between AE-KO and each of the other groups demonstrated a clear separation between AE-KO and both HLA-DR3 and HLA-DR3.DQ8 (Fig. 2B), whereas AE-KO and HLA-DQ8 exhibited some compositional similarity.

FIGURE 2.

Distinct gut microbiota among AE-KO and HLA transgenic mice.

(A) Box plot showing unfiltered genus richness (Chao1 index) of AE-KO, HLA-DQ8, HLA-DR3, and HLA-DR3·DQ8 groups. Overall p value: 0.0049. (B) Pairwise principal coordinate analysis of β-diversity using Euclidean distance at the genus level. Distinct separation between AE-KO and both HLA-DR3 and HLA-DR3·DQ8, whereas there is overlap between AE-KO and HLA-DQ8. PC1 and PC2 are the first and second principal components, respectively, and represent the most and second-most amount of variation in the bacterial abundance data between all the samples. (C) Square root scaled bar plots of relative abundances of significant taxa at each taxonomic level with relative abundance >0.002. (D) Top 15 important features selected by random forest. Removing Rikenella from the feature set available to the model led to ∼16% decrease in classification accuracy. Removing Desulfovibrio led to around a 10% decrease in accuracy. (E) Top 15 significant genera selected by LEfSe analysis, LDA score reflecting their effect sizes, and the heat map on the right depicting whether they were high, medium, or low in AE-KO, HLA-DQ8, and HLA-DR3 groups from left to right.

FIGURE 2.

Distinct gut microbiota among AE-KO and HLA transgenic mice.

(A) Box plot showing unfiltered genus richness (Chao1 index) of AE-KO, HLA-DQ8, HLA-DR3, and HLA-DR3·DQ8 groups. Overall p value: 0.0049. (B) Pairwise principal coordinate analysis of β-diversity using Euclidean distance at the genus level. Distinct separation between AE-KO and both HLA-DR3 and HLA-DR3·DQ8, whereas there is overlap between AE-KO and HLA-DQ8. PC1 and PC2 are the first and second principal components, respectively, and represent the most and second-most amount of variation in the bacterial abundance data between all the samples. (C) Square root scaled bar plots of relative abundances of significant taxa at each taxonomic level with relative abundance >0.002. (D) Top 15 important features selected by random forest. Removing Rikenella from the feature set available to the model led to ∼16% decrease in classification accuracy. Removing Desulfovibrio led to around a 10% decrease in accuracy. (E) Top 15 significant genera selected by LEfSe analysis, LDA score reflecting their effect sizes, and the heat map on the right depicting whether they were high, medium, or low in AE-KO, HLA-DQ8, and HLA-DR3 groups from left to right.

Close modal

A Kruskal–Wallis test was performed at all taxonomic levels from phylum to genus, restricted to taxa with relative abundance >0.002. At a FDR of 5%, 33 differentially abundant taxa were identified (Fig. 2C, Table I). AE-KO mice had a higher overall abundance of Bacteroidota (also known as Bacteroidetes; the Silva database uses the Genome Taxonomy Database naming convention) when compared with HLA-DQ8 and HLA-DR3 mice. The AE-KO group also exhibited higher abundance of the phyla Campilobacterota and Deferribacterota when compared with HLA-DR3, but there was no difference when compared with HLA-DQ8. The Patescibacteria phylum was found in lower abundance in AE-KO mice when compared with HLA-DR3 mice but not with HLA-DQ8 mice (Table I).

Table I.

Significant taxa between AE-KO, HLA-DQ8, and HLA-DR3 at the phylum through genus levels

TaxaMean (Standard Error) Relative Abundancep Valueq Value
AE-KOHLA-DQ8HLA-DR3
Phylum      
 Bacteroidota (Bacteroides5.66 × 10−1 (3.32 × 10−24.82 × 10−1 (3.53 × 10−24.22 × 10−1 (3.21 × 10−21.21 × 10−2 1.93 × 10−2 
 Campilobacterota 8.82 × 10−2 (1.55 × 10−28.15 × 10−2 (1.29 × 10−24.45 × 10−2 (1.05 × 10−23.45 × 10−2 4.59 × 10−2 
 Deferribacterota 2.45 × 10−2 (6.33 × 10−31.96 × 10−2 (6.40 × 10−35.65 × 10−3 (2.33 × 10−31.31 × 10−3 2.62 × 10−3 
 Desulfobacterota 1.83 × 10−3 (4.62 × 10−41.32 × 10−3 (4.10 × 10−49.07 × 10−3 (2.39 × 10−31.94 × 10−4 6.17 × 10−4 
 Firmicutes 2.44 × 10−1 (2.12 × 10−23.59 × 10−1 (3.99 × 10−24.50 × 10−1 (3.43 × 10−22.31 × 10−4 6.17 × 10−4 
 Patescibacteria 7.58 × 10−3 (1.93 × 10−31.59 × 10−2 (2.55 × 10−33.06 × 10−2 (3.38 × 10−32.07 × 10−5 1.66 × 10−4 
 Proteobacteria 6.11 × 10−2 (1.15 × 10−23.03 × 10−2 (8.53 × 10−32.46 × 10−2 (4.55 × 10−34.76 × 10−2 5.44 × 10−2 
Class      
 Bacilli 1.12 × 10−1 (1.50 × 10−22.07 × 10−1 (3.55 × 10−23.09 × 10−1 (4.19 × 10−21.07 × 10−3 3.26 × 10−3 
 Bacteroidia 5.66 × 10−1 (3.32 × 10−24.82 × 10−1 (3.53 × 10−24.22 × 10−1 (3.21 × 10−21.21 × 10−2 2.01 × 10−2 
 Campylobacteria 8.82 × 10−2 (1.55 × 10−28.15 × 10−2 (1.29 × 10−24.45 × 10−2 (1.05 × 10−23.45 × 10−2 4.92 × 10−2 
 Coriobacteriia 2.90 × 10−3 (6.10 × 10−42.57 × 10−3 (4.55 × 10−47.15 × 10−3 (1.23 × 10−31.63 × 10−3 3.26 × 10−3 
 Deferribacteres 2.45 × 10−2 (6.33 × 10−31.96 × 10−2 (6.40 × 10−35.65 × 10−3 (2.33 × 10−31.31 × 10−3 3.26 × 10−3 
 Desulfovibrionia 1.83 × 10−3 (4.62 × 10−41.32 × 10−3 (4.10 × 10−49.07 × 10−3 (2.39 × 10−31.94 × 10−4 9.71 × 10−4 
 Gammaproteobacteria 6.11 × 10−2 (1.15 × 10−23.03 × 10−2 (8.53 × 10−32.46 × 10−2 (4.55 × 10−34.76 × 10−2 5.95 × 10−2 
 Saccharimonadia 7.58 × 10−3 (1.93 × 10−31.59 × 10−2 (2.55 × 10−33.06 × 10−2 (3.38 × 10−32.07 × 10−5 2.07 × 10−4 
Order      
 Acholeplasmatales 4.47 × 10−4 (4.47 × 10−42.54 × 10−2 (5.61 × 10−38.05 × 10−3 (2.20 × 10−32.22 × 10−7 4.00 × 10−6 
 Bacteroidales 5.66 × 10−1 (3.32 × 10−24.82 × 10−1 (3.53 × 10−24.22 × 10−1 (3.21 × 10−21.21 × 10−2 2.17 × 10−2 
 Clostridiales 2.86 × 10−3 (6.17 × 10−41.05 × 10−3 (4.84 × 10−42.09 × 10−3 (7.96 × 10−42.54 × 10−2 4.15 × 10−2 
 Coriobacterales 2.90 × 10−3 (6.10 × 10−42.57 × 10−3 (4.55 × 10−47.15 × 10−3 (1.23 × 10−31.63 × 10−3 4.19 × 10−3 
 Deferribacterales 2.45 × 10−2 (6.33 × 10−31.96 × 10−2 (6.40 × 10−35.65 × 10−3 (2.33 × 10−31.31 × 10−3 3.92 × 10−3 
 Desulfovibrionales 1.83 × 10−3 (4.62 × 10−41.32 × 10−3 (4.10 × 10−49.07 × 10−3 (2.39 × 10−31.94 × 10−4 8.74 × 10−4 
 Enterobacterales 4.17 × 10−2 (9.63 × 10−31.40 × 10−2 (7.07 × 10−31.13 × 10−4 (4.85 × 10−56.41 × 10−7 5.77 × 10−6 
 Lactobacillales 6.74 × 10−2 (1.13 × 10−21.29 × 10−1 (3.17 × 10−22.21 × 10−1 (3.60 × 10−21.24 × 10−3 3.92 × 10−3 
 Oscillospirales 1.53 × 10−2 (2.30 × 10−33.00 × 10−2 (6.35 × 10−32.56 × 10−2 (3.53 × 10−31.02 × 10−2 2.17 × 10−2 
 Peptococcales 3.12 × 10−4 (9.98 × 10−53.25 × 10−4 (6.94 × 10−51.12 × 10−4 (4.46 × 10−51.09 × 10−2 2.17 × 10−2 
 Saccharimonadales 7.58 × 10−3 (1.93 × 10−31.59 × 10−2 (2.55 × 10−33.06 × 10−2 (3.38 × 10−32.07 × 10−5 1.24 × 10−4 
Family      
 Acholeplasmataceae 4.47 × 10−4 (4.47 × 10−42.54 × 10−2 (5.61 × 10−38.05 × 10−3 (2.20 × 10−32.22 × 10−7 6.22 × 10−6 
 Deferribacteraceae 2.45 × 10−2 (6.33 × 10−31.96 × 10−2 (6.40 × 10−35.65 × 10−3 (2.33 × 10−31.31 × 10−3 5.23 × 10−3 
 Desulfovibrionaceae 1.83 × 10−3 (4.62 × 10−41.32 × 10−3 (4.10 × 10−49.07 × 10−3 (2.39 × 10−31.94 × 10−4 1.09 × 10−3 
 Eggerthellaceae 1.86 × 10−3 (3.42 × 10−42.28 × 10−3 (3.94 × 10−46.94 × 10−3 (1.17 × 10−31.16 × 10−4 8.09 × 10−4 
 Enterobacteriaceae 4.17 × 10−2 (9.63 × 10−31.40 × 10−2 (7.07 × 10−31.13 × 10−4 (4.85 × 10−56.41 × 10−7 8.97 × 10−6 
 Lactobacillaceae 6.70 × 10−2 (1.13 × 10−21.27 × 10−1 (3.17 × 10−22.20 × 10−1 (3.59 × 10−21.24 × 10−3 5.23 × 10−3 
 Peptococcaceae 3.12 × 10−4 (9.98 × 10−53.25 × 10−4 (6.94 × 10−51.12 × 10−4 (4.46 × 10−51.09 × 10−2 3.38 × 10−2 
 Prevotellaceae 1.00 × 10−1 (1.08 × 10−21.39 × 10−1 (2.76 × 10−26.28 × 10−2 (8.58 × 10−39.70 × 10−3 3.38 × 10−2 
 Saccharimonadaceae 7.58E-3 (1.93 × 10−31.59 × 10−2 (2.55 × 10−33.06 × 10−2 (3.38 × 10−32.07 × 10−5 1.94 × 10−4 
Genus      
 Lachnospiraceae: Acetatifactor 5.71 × 10−5 (4.48 × 10−51.73 × 10−3 (5.41 × 10−41.41 × 10−3 (6.47 × 10−41.65 × 10−4 8.27 × 10−4 
 Rikenellaceae: Alistipes 4.89 × 10−2 (1.09 × 10−26.44 × 10−2 (7.74 × 10−32.89 × 10−2 (4.92 × 10−31.50 × 10−2 3.29 × 10−2 
 Prevotellaceae: Alloprevotella 8.45 × 10−2 (1.04 × 10−21.38 × 10−1 (2.77 × 10−24.85 × 10−2 (7.01 × 10−32.13 × 10−3 6.88 × 10−3 
 Bacteroidetes: Bacteroides 2.67 × 10−1 (3.56 × 10−21.46 × 10−1 (2.82 × 10−21.83 × 10−1 (1.67 × 10−22.84 × 10−2 4.88 × 10−2 
 Proteobacteria: Bilophila 1.77 × 10−3 (4.45 × 10−42.96 × 10−4 (1.00 × 10−43.28 × 10−4 (1.38 × 10−42.83 × 10−3 8.19 × 10−3 
 Clostridiaceae: C. arthromitus 2.86 × 10−3 (6.17 × 10−41.05 × 10−3 (4.84 × 10−42.09 × 10−3 (7.96 × 10−42.54 × 10−2 4.88 × 10−2 
 Eubacteriales: Colidextribacter 4.47 × 10−3 (8.08 × 10−41.14 × 10−2 (2.07 × 10−31.12 × 10−2 (1.42 × 10−32.40 × 10−4 1.10 × 10−3 
 Proteobacteria: Desulfovibrio 6.95 × 10−5 (3.34 × 10−51.03 × 10−3 (3.63 × 10−48.75 × 10−3 (2.40 × 10−36.33 × 10−8 1.74 × 10−6 
 Proteobacteria: Escherichia 4.17 × 10−2 (9.63 × 10−31.40 × 10−2 (7.07 × 10−31.13 × 10−4 (4.85 × 10−56.41 × 10−7 8.81 × 10−6 
 Helicobacteraceae: Helicobacter 8.82 × 10−2 (1.55 × 10−28.00 × 10−2 (1.27 × 10−24.31 × 10−2 (1.02 × 10−22.70 × 10−2 4.88 × 10−2 
 Firmicutes: Ileibacterium 7.95 × 10−4 (4.61 × 10−41.61 × 10−2 (5.81 × 10−31.17 × 10−2 (4.10 × 10−31.64 × 10−3 5.63 × 10−3 
 Lachnospiraceae: Lachnoclostridium 1.22 × 10−2 (2.33 × 10−31.43 × 10−2 (1.86 × 10−32.78 × 10−2 (4.73 × 10−32.77 × 10−2 4.88 × 10−2 
 Lachnospiraceae: Lachnospiraceae UCG 006 2.26 × 10−3 (1.06 × 10−34.56 × 10−3 (1.44 × 10−36.38 × 10−3 (2.01 × 10−36.59 × 10−3 1.65 × 10−2 
 Lactobacillaceae: Lactobacillus 6.70 × 10−2 (1.13 × 10−21.27 × 10−1 (3.17 × 10−22.20 × 10−1 (3.59 × 10−21.24 × 10−3 4.80 × 10−3 
 Deferribacteraceae: Mucispirillum 2.45 × 10−2 (6.33 × 10−31.96 × 10−2 (6.40 × 10−35.65 × 10−3 (2.33 × 10−31.31 × 10−3 4.80 × 10−3 
 Porphyromonadaceae: Odoribacter 1.67 × 10−2 (3.68 × 10−32.93 × 10−2 (5.67 × 10−31.12 × 10−2 (1.62 × 10−32.67 × 10−2 4.88 × 10−2 
 Bacteroidetes: Parabacteroides 8.89 × 10−2 (8.27 × 10−35.38 × 10−2 (7.64 × 10−37.11 × 10−2 (1.00 × 10−22.57 × 10−2 4.88 × 10−2 
 Bacteroidetes: Rikenella 2.20 × 10−4 (1.83 × 10−46.49 × 10−3 (9.47 × 10−41.49 × 10−2 (1.98 × 10−31.82 × 10−8 1.00 × 10−6 
 Proteobacteria: Wolinella 1.29 × 10−5 (8.96 × 10−61.50 × 10−3 (3.16 × 10−41.41 × 10−3 (3.54 × 10−42.76 × 10−6 2.53 × 10−5 
TaxaMean (Standard Error) Relative Abundancep Valueq Value
AE-KOHLA-DQ8HLA-DR3
Phylum      
 Bacteroidota (Bacteroides5.66 × 10−1 (3.32 × 10−24.82 × 10−1 (3.53 × 10−24.22 × 10−1 (3.21 × 10−21.21 × 10−2 1.93 × 10−2 
 Campilobacterota 8.82 × 10−2 (1.55 × 10−28.15 × 10−2 (1.29 × 10−24.45 × 10−2 (1.05 × 10−23.45 × 10−2 4.59 × 10−2 
 Deferribacterota 2.45 × 10−2 (6.33 × 10−31.96 × 10−2 (6.40 × 10−35.65 × 10−3 (2.33 × 10−31.31 × 10−3 2.62 × 10−3 
 Desulfobacterota 1.83 × 10−3 (4.62 × 10−41.32 × 10−3 (4.10 × 10−49.07 × 10−3 (2.39 × 10−31.94 × 10−4 6.17 × 10−4 
 Firmicutes 2.44 × 10−1 (2.12 × 10−23.59 × 10−1 (3.99 × 10−24.50 × 10−1 (3.43 × 10−22.31 × 10−4 6.17 × 10−4 
 Patescibacteria 7.58 × 10−3 (1.93 × 10−31.59 × 10−2 (2.55 × 10−33.06 × 10−2 (3.38 × 10−32.07 × 10−5 1.66 × 10−4 
 Proteobacteria 6.11 × 10−2 (1.15 × 10−23.03 × 10−2 (8.53 × 10−32.46 × 10−2 (4.55 × 10−34.76 × 10−2 5.44 × 10−2 
Class      
 Bacilli 1.12 × 10−1 (1.50 × 10−22.07 × 10−1 (3.55 × 10−23.09 × 10−1 (4.19 × 10−21.07 × 10−3 3.26 × 10−3 
 Bacteroidia 5.66 × 10−1 (3.32 × 10−24.82 × 10−1 (3.53 × 10−24.22 × 10−1 (3.21 × 10−21.21 × 10−2 2.01 × 10−2 
 Campylobacteria 8.82 × 10−2 (1.55 × 10−28.15 × 10−2 (1.29 × 10−24.45 × 10−2 (1.05 × 10−23.45 × 10−2 4.92 × 10−2 
 Coriobacteriia 2.90 × 10−3 (6.10 × 10−42.57 × 10−3 (4.55 × 10−47.15 × 10−3 (1.23 × 10−31.63 × 10−3 3.26 × 10−3 
 Deferribacteres 2.45 × 10−2 (6.33 × 10−31.96 × 10−2 (6.40 × 10−35.65 × 10−3 (2.33 × 10−31.31 × 10−3 3.26 × 10−3 
 Desulfovibrionia 1.83 × 10−3 (4.62 × 10−41.32 × 10−3 (4.10 × 10−49.07 × 10−3 (2.39 × 10−31.94 × 10−4 9.71 × 10−4 
 Gammaproteobacteria 6.11 × 10−2 (1.15 × 10−23.03 × 10−2 (8.53 × 10−32.46 × 10−2 (4.55 × 10−34.76 × 10−2 5.95 × 10−2 
 Saccharimonadia 7.58 × 10−3 (1.93 × 10−31.59 × 10−2 (2.55 × 10−33.06 × 10−2 (3.38 × 10−32.07 × 10−5 2.07 × 10−4 
Order      
 Acholeplasmatales 4.47 × 10−4 (4.47 × 10−42.54 × 10−2 (5.61 × 10−38.05 × 10−3 (2.20 × 10−32.22 × 10−7 4.00 × 10−6 
 Bacteroidales 5.66 × 10−1 (3.32 × 10−24.82 × 10−1 (3.53 × 10−24.22 × 10−1 (3.21 × 10−21.21 × 10−2 2.17 × 10−2 
 Clostridiales 2.86 × 10−3 (6.17 × 10−41.05 × 10−3 (4.84 × 10−42.09 × 10−3 (7.96 × 10−42.54 × 10−2 4.15 × 10−2 
 Coriobacterales 2.90 × 10−3 (6.10 × 10−42.57 × 10−3 (4.55 × 10−47.15 × 10−3 (1.23 × 10−31.63 × 10−3 4.19 × 10−3 
 Deferribacterales 2.45 × 10−2 (6.33 × 10−31.96 × 10−2 (6.40 × 10−35.65 × 10−3 (2.33 × 10−31.31 × 10−3 3.92 × 10−3 
 Desulfovibrionales 1.83 × 10−3 (4.62 × 10−41.32 × 10−3 (4.10 × 10−49.07 × 10−3 (2.39 × 10−31.94 × 10−4 8.74 × 10−4 
 Enterobacterales 4.17 × 10−2 (9.63 × 10−31.40 × 10−2 (7.07 × 10−31.13 × 10−4 (4.85 × 10−56.41 × 10−7 5.77 × 10−6 
 Lactobacillales 6.74 × 10−2 (1.13 × 10−21.29 × 10−1 (3.17 × 10−22.21 × 10−1 (3.60 × 10−21.24 × 10−3 3.92 × 10−3 
 Oscillospirales 1.53 × 10−2 (2.30 × 10−33.00 × 10−2 (6.35 × 10−32.56 × 10−2 (3.53 × 10−31.02 × 10−2 2.17 × 10−2 
 Peptococcales 3.12 × 10−4 (9.98 × 10−53.25 × 10−4 (6.94 × 10−51.12 × 10−4 (4.46 × 10−51.09 × 10−2 2.17 × 10−2 
 Saccharimonadales 7.58 × 10−3 (1.93 × 10−31.59 × 10−2 (2.55 × 10−33.06 × 10−2 (3.38 × 10−32.07 × 10−5 1.24 × 10−4 
Family      
 Acholeplasmataceae 4.47 × 10−4 (4.47 × 10−42.54 × 10−2 (5.61 × 10−38.05 × 10−3 (2.20 × 10−32.22 × 10−7 6.22 × 10−6 
 Deferribacteraceae 2.45 × 10−2 (6.33 × 10−31.96 × 10−2 (6.40 × 10−35.65 × 10−3 (2.33 × 10−31.31 × 10−3 5.23 × 10−3 
 Desulfovibrionaceae 1.83 × 10−3 (4.62 × 10−41.32 × 10−3 (4.10 × 10−49.07 × 10−3 (2.39 × 10−31.94 × 10−4 1.09 × 10−3 
 Eggerthellaceae 1.86 × 10−3 (3.42 × 10−42.28 × 10−3 (3.94 × 10−46.94 × 10−3 (1.17 × 10−31.16 × 10−4 8.09 × 10−4 
 Enterobacteriaceae 4.17 × 10−2 (9.63 × 10−31.40 × 10−2 (7.07 × 10−31.13 × 10−4 (4.85 × 10−56.41 × 10−7 8.97 × 10−6 
 Lactobacillaceae 6.70 × 10−2 (1.13 × 10−21.27 × 10−1 (3.17 × 10−22.20 × 10−1 (3.59 × 10−21.24 × 10−3 5.23 × 10−3 
 Peptococcaceae 3.12 × 10−4 (9.98 × 10−53.25 × 10−4 (6.94 × 10−51.12 × 10−4 (4.46 × 10−51.09 × 10−2 3.38 × 10−2 
 Prevotellaceae 1.00 × 10−1 (1.08 × 10−21.39 × 10−1 (2.76 × 10−26.28 × 10−2 (8.58 × 10−39.70 × 10−3 3.38 × 10−2 
 Saccharimonadaceae 7.58E-3 (1.93 × 10−31.59 × 10−2 (2.55 × 10−33.06 × 10−2 (3.38 × 10−32.07 × 10−5 1.94 × 10−4 
Genus      
 Lachnospiraceae: Acetatifactor 5.71 × 10−5 (4.48 × 10−51.73 × 10−3 (5.41 × 10−41.41 × 10−3 (6.47 × 10−41.65 × 10−4 8.27 × 10−4 
 Rikenellaceae: Alistipes 4.89 × 10−2 (1.09 × 10−26.44 × 10−2 (7.74 × 10−32.89 × 10−2 (4.92 × 10−31.50 × 10−2 3.29 × 10−2 
 Prevotellaceae: Alloprevotella 8.45 × 10−2 (1.04 × 10−21.38 × 10−1 (2.77 × 10−24.85 × 10−2 (7.01 × 10−32.13 × 10−3 6.88 × 10−3 
 Bacteroidetes: Bacteroides 2.67 × 10−1 (3.56 × 10−21.46 × 10−1 (2.82 × 10−21.83 × 10−1 (1.67 × 10−22.84 × 10−2 4.88 × 10−2 
 Proteobacteria: Bilophila 1.77 × 10−3 (4.45 × 10−42.96 × 10−4 (1.00 × 10−43.28 × 10−4 (1.38 × 10−42.83 × 10−3 8.19 × 10−3 
 Clostridiaceae: C. arthromitus 2.86 × 10−3 (6.17 × 10−41.05 × 10−3 (4.84 × 10−42.09 × 10−3 (7.96 × 10−42.54 × 10−2 4.88 × 10−2 
 Eubacteriales: Colidextribacter 4.47 × 10−3 (8.08 × 10−41.14 × 10−2 (2.07 × 10−31.12 × 10−2 (1.42 × 10−32.40 × 10−4 1.10 × 10−3 
 Proteobacteria: Desulfovibrio 6.95 × 10−5 (3.34 × 10−51.03 × 10−3 (3.63 × 10−48.75 × 10−3 (2.40 × 10−36.33 × 10−8 1.74 × 10−6 
 Proteobacteria: Escherichia 4.17 × 10−2 (9.63 × 10−31.40 × 10−2 (7.07 × 10−31.13 × 10−4 (4.85 × 10−56.41 × 10−7 8.81 × 10−6 
 Helicobacteraceae: Helicobacter 8.82 × 10−2 (1.55 × 10−28.00 × 10−2 (1.27 × 10−24.31 × 10−2 (1.02 × 10−22.70 × 10−2 4.88 × 10−2 
 Firmicutes: Ileibacterium 7.95 × 10−4 (4.61 × 10−41.61 × 10−2 (5.81 × 10−31.17 × 10−2 (4.10 × 10−31.64 × 10−3 5.63 × 10−3 
 Lachnospiraceae: Lachnoclostridium 1.22 × 10−2 (2.33 × 10−31.43 × 10−2 (1.86 × 10−32.78 × 10−2 (4.73 × 10−32.77 × 10−2 4.88 × 10−2 
 Lachnospiraceae: Lachnospiraceae UCG 006 2.26 × 10−3 (1.06 × 10−34.56 × 10−3 (1.44 × 10−36.38 × 10−3 (2.01 × 10−36.59 × 10−3 1.65 × 10−2 
 Lactobacillaceae: Lactobacillus 6.70 × 10−2 (1.13 × 10−21.27 × 10−1 (3.17 × 10−22.20 × 10−1 (3.59 × 10−21.24 × 10−3 4.80 × 10−3 
 Deferribacteraceae: Mucispirillum 2.45 × 10−2 (6.33 × 10−31.96 × 10−2 (6.40 × 10−35.65 × 10−3 (2.33 × 10−31.31 × 10−3 4.80 × 10−3 
 Porphyromonadaceae: Odoribacter 1.67 × 10−2 (3.68 × 10−32.93 × 10−2 (5.67 × 10−31.12 × 10−2 (1.62 × 10−32.67 × 10−2 4.88 × 10−2 
 Bacteroidetes: Parabacteroides 8.89 × 10−2 (8.27 × 10−35.38 × 10−2 (7.64 × 10−37.11 × 10−2 (1.00 × 10−22.57 × 10−2 4.88 × 10−2 
 Bacteroidetes: Rikenella 2.20 × 10−4 (1.83 × 10−46.49 × 10−3 (9.47 × 10−41.49 × 10−2 (1.98 × 10−31.82 × 10−8 1.00 × 10−6 
 Proteobacteria: Wolinella 1.29 × 10−5 (8.96 × 10−61.50 × 10−3 (3.16 × 10−41.41 × 10−3 (3.54 × 10−42.76 × 10−6 2.53 × 10−5 

Kruskal–Wallis test with Benjamini–Hochberg adjustment was performed on sample-scaled counts at a significance level of 0.05 to identify differentially abundant taxa. The q values are the padj.

Numerous genera were depleted in AE-KO mice compared with both HLA-DQ8 and HLA-DR3, most of which belong to the Firmicutes phylum: Acetatifactor, Anaeroplasma, Ileibacterium, Colidextribacter, Intestinimonas, and Lachnospiraceae UCG-006. Additionally, Wolinella of the Campilobacterota phylum and Rikenella of the Bacteroidota (more often referred to as Bacteroidetes) phylum were depleted in AE-KO. In the Desulfobacterota phylum, whereas Desulfovibrio was depleted in AE-KO, Bilophila was significantly overabundant compared with the other two groups (Fig. 3, Table I).

FIGURE 3.

Differentially abundant bacteria in AE-KO, HLA-DQ8, and HLA-DR3 mice.

Colors indicate relative abundance increasing in value from gray to red. Bacteria were grouped into three groups based on k-means clustering.

FIGURE 3.

Differentially abundant bacteria in AE-KO, HLA-DQ8, and HLA-DR3 mice.

Colors indicate relative abundance increasing in value from gray to red. Bacteria were grouped into three groups based on k-means clustering.

Close modal

Although numerous bacteria were differentially abundant in AE-KO, we wanted to identify specific bacteria that could best discriminate between AE-KO, HLA-DQ8, and HLA-DR3. To do this, we performed a random forest algorithm to classify the samples as either AE-KO, HLA-DQ8, or HLA-DR3 using the genus abundance data. Important bacteria were then identified based on how much the random forest classification accuracy decreased when that bacterium was removed from the feature set (Fig. 2D). Using this approach, Rikenella and Wolinella were identified as the top two important features in identifying the AE-KO genotype, with mean decrease accuracy of 6 and 4%, respectively.

In an effort to highlight the bacteria most likely to have biological relevance in the differences between AE-KO, HLA-DQ8, and HLA-DR3 mice, LEfSe was performed. The effect sizes, or how well the abundance of each bacteria separated the groups, of the 15 most significant genera are shown in (Fig. 2E. This analysis highlights Bacteroides, Parabacteroides, Helicobacter, and Escherichia as important features for distinguishing AE-KO from the other two groups. Each of these genera are overabundant in AE-KO; although Parabacteroides was only significantly overabundant in AE-KO compared with HLA-DQ8, Helicobacter and Escherichia were only significantly overabundant compared with HLA-DR3.

Next, microbial composition in HLA-DQ8, HLA-DR3, and HLA-DR3.DQ8 were characterized to highlight differences and similarities between single and double transgenic mice. First, β-diversity analysis using Euclidean-based distance at the genus level was performed on all four groups, showing HLA-DQ8, HLA-DR3, and HLA-DR3.DQ8 clustering together, separate from AE-KO, even when stratified by sex (Fig. 4A, Supplemental Fig. 1). Removing AE-KO from this analysis shows that HLA-DR3.DQ8 is compositionally distinct from HLA-DR3 but very similar to HLA-DQ8 (Fig. 4B).

FIGURE 4.

Distinct microbiota in single and double transgenic mice.

(A) PCA plot comparing β-diversity of all four groups at the genus level demonstrating separation of AE-KO from the other three groups. (B) PCA plot comparing Euclidean distance–based β-diversity of DQ8, DR3, and DR3.DQ8 at the genus level. (C) Square root scaled bar plots of relative abundances of significant taxa at each taxonomic level with relative abundance >0.006. (D) Top 15 important features selected by random forest. Removing Turicibacter from the feature set available to the model leads to ∼11% decrease in accuracy. (E) Top 15 significant genera selected by LEfSe analysis. LDA score reflects their effect sizes, and the heat map on the right depicts whether they were high, medium, or low in HLA-DQ8, HLA-DR3, and HLA-DR3.DQ8 groups from left to right.

FIGURE 4.

Distinct microbiota in single and double transgenic mice.

(A) PCA plot comparing β-diversity of all four groups at the genus level demonstrating separation of AE-KO from the other three groups. (B) PCA plot comparing Euclidean distance–based β-diversity of DQ8, DR3, and DR3.DQ8 at the genus level. (C) Square root scaled bar plots of relative abundances of significant taxa at each taxonomic level with relative abundance >0.006. (D) Top 15 important features selected by random forest. Removing Turicibacter from the feature set available to the model leads to ∼11% decrease in accuracy. (E) Top 15 significant genera selected by LEfSe analysis. LDA score reflects their effect sizes, and the heat map on the right depicts whether they were high, medium, or low in HLA-DQ8, HLA-DR3, and HLA-DR3.DQ8 groups from left to right.

Close modal

The Kruskal–Wallis test was performed to identify taxa that were differentially abundant between HLA-DQ8, HLA-DR3, and HLA-DR3.DQ8 groups at all taxonomic levels from phylum to genus. The p values were adjusted using an FDR of 5%, and the 28 resulting taxa with relative abundance >0.006 are shown in (Fig. 4C. Within the Bacteroides phylum, the HLA-DQ8 group exhibited an overabundance of Alistipes but decreased abundance of Prevotellaceae UCG-001 at the genus level. The HLA-DQ8 group also had a higher abundance of Desulfovibrio (Desulfobacterota) and Rikenella (Bacteroidota) (Figs. 4C, 5, 6; Table II).

FIGURE 5.

Differentially abundant bacteria among HLA-DQ8, HLA-DR3, and HLA-DR3.DQ8 mice.

Colors indicate relative abundance increasing in value from gray to red. Bacteria were grouped into three groups based on k-means clustering.

FIGURE 5.

Differentially abundant bacteria among HLA-DQ8, HLA-DR3, and HLA-DR3.DQ8 mice.

Colors indicate relative abundance increasing in value from gray to red. Bacteria were grouped into three groups based on k-means clustering.

Close modal
FIGURE 6.

Differentially abundant bacteria in HLA-DQ8 mice.

Abundance values are sum scaled to one million. The three lines represent the lower quartile, median, and upper quartile from lowest to highest, respectively. Significance labels: *p < 0.05, **0.05 > p > 0.01, ***0.01 > p > 0.001, ****p < 0.001.

FIGURE 6.

Differentially abundant bacteria in HLA-DQ8 mice.

Abundance values are sum scaled to one million. The three lines represent the lower quartile, median, and upper quartile from lowest to highest, respectively. Significance labels: *p < 0.05, **0.05 > p > 0.01, ***0.01 > p > 0.001, ****p < 0.001.

Close modal
Table II.

Significant taxa at between HLA-DQ8, HLA-DR3, and HLA-DR3.DQ8 at the phylum through genus ranks

TaxaMean (Standard Error) Relative Abundancep Valueq Value
HLA-DQ8HLA-DR3HLA-DR3.DQ8
Phylum      
 Campilobacterota 8.04 × 10−2 (1.28 × 10−24.47 × 10−2 (1.04 × 10−21.26 × 10−1 (1.87 × 10−29.95 × 10−4 1.99 × 10−3 
 Deferribacterota 1.93 × 10−2 (6.35 × 10−35.65 × 10−3 (2.32 × 10−33.00 × 10−2 (6.99 × 10−34.32 × 10−4 1.15 × 10−3 
 Desulfobacterota 1.31 × 10−3 (4.10 × 10−49.15E-3 (2.39 × 10−34.35 × 10−3 (1.21 × 10−33.91 × 10−4 1.15 × 10−3 
 Patescibacteria 1.57 × 10−2 (2.54 × 10−33.08 × 10−2 (3.41 × 10−36.35 × 10−3 (8.80 × 10−41.29 × 10−6 1.03 × 10−5 
 Proteobacteria 1.45 × 10−2 (5.56 × 10−32.46 × 10−2 (4.57 × 10−33.24 × 10−2 (3.20 × 10−35.95 × 10−3 9.52 × 10−3 
Class      
 Campylobacteria 8.04 × 10−2 (1.28 × 10−24.47 × 10−2 (1.04 × 10−21.26 × 10−1 (1.87 × 10−29.95 × 10−4 1.99 × 10−3 
 Coriobacteriia 2.22 × 10−3 (3.69 × 10−47.01 × 10−3 (1.18 × 10−32.25 × 10−3 (3.47 × 10−43.67 × 10−4 1.08 × 10−3 
 Deferribacteres 1.93 × 10−2 (6.35 × 10−35.65 × 10−3 (2.32 × 10−33.00 × 10−2 (6.99 × 10−34.32 × 10−4 1.08 × 10−3 
 Desulfovibrionia 1.31 × 10−3 (4.10 × 10−49.15 × 10−3 (2.39 × 10−34.35 × 10−3 (1.21 × 10−33.91 × 10−4 1.08 × 10−3 
 Gammaproteobacteria 1.45 × 10−2 (5.56 × 10−32.46 × 10−2 (4.57 × 10−33.24 × 10−2 (3.20 × 10−35.95 × 10−3 9.92 × 10−3 
 Saccharimonadia 1.57 × 10−2 (2.54 × 10−33.08 × 10−2 (3.41 × 10−36.35 × 10−3 (8.80 × 10−41.29 × 10−6 1.29 × 10−5 
Order      
 Acholeplasmatales 2.55 × 10−2 (5.69 × 10−38.12 × 10−3 (2.21 × 10−31.14 × 10−2 (1.46 × 10−35.24 × 10−3 1.11 × 10−2 
 Burkholderiales 1.45 × 10−2 (5.56 × 10−32.46 × 10−2 (4.57 × 10−33.24 × 10−2 (3.20 × 10−35.95 × 10−3 1.12 × 10−2 
 Campylobacterales 8.04 × 10−2 (1.28 × 10−24.47 × 10−2 (1.04 × 10−21.26 × 10−1 (1.87 × 10−29.95 × 10−4 2.42 × 10−3 
 Clostridiales 4.99 × 10−3 (1.94 × 10−32.50 × 10−3 (8.39 × 10−41.81 × 10−2 (3.53 × 10−35.47 × 10−5 3.10 × 10−4 
 Coriobacteriales 2.22 × 10−3 (3.69 × 10−47.01 × 10−3 (1.18 × 10−32.25 × 10−3 (3.47 × 10−43.67 × 10−4 1.22 × 10−3 
 Deferribacterales 1.93 × 10−2 (6.35 × 10−35.65 × 10−3 (2.32 × 10−33.00 × 10−2 (6.99 × 10−34.32 × 10−4 1.22 × 10−3 
 Desulfovibrionales 1.31 × 10−3 (4.10 × 10−49.15 × 10−3 (2.39 × 10−34.35 × 10−3 (1.21 × 10−33.91 × 10−4 1.22 × 10−3 
 Peptococcales 3.19 × 10−4 (6.51 × 10−51.13 × 10−4 (4.46 × 10−52.95 × 10−4 (8.24 × 10−58.71 × 10−3 1.48 × 10−2 
 Peptostreptococcales_Tissierellales 3.40 × 10−3 (1.22 × 10−37.74 × 10−4 (1.68 × 10−41.02 × 10−2 (2.45 × 10−33.47 × 10−6 2.95 × 10−5 
 Saccharimonadales 1.57 × 10−2 (2.54 × 10−33.08 × 10−2 (3.41 × 10−36.35E-3 (8.80 × 10−41.29 × 10−6 2.19 × 10−5 
Family      
 Acholeplasmataceae 2.55 × 10−2 (5.69 × 10−38.12 × 10−3 (2.21 × 10−31.14 × 10−2 (1.46 × 10−35.24 × 10−3 1.28 × 10−2 
 Bacteroidaceae 1.47 × 10−1 (3.04 × 10−21.83 × 10−1 (1.65 × 10−21.14 × 10−1 (9.09 × 10−31.85 × 10−2 3.24 × 10−2 
 Butyricicoccaceae 2.33 × 10−3 (6.39 × 10−41.37 × 10−3 (3.02 × 10−43.24 × 10−3 (4.03 × 10−45.97 × 10−3 1.28 × 10−2 
 Clostridiaceae 4.99 × 10−3 (1.94 × 10−32.50 × 10−3 (8.39 × 10−41.81 × 10−2 (3.53 × 10−35.47 × 10−5 5.10 × 10−4 
 Deferribacteraceae 1.93 × 10−2 (6.35 × 10−35.65 × 10−3 (2.32 × 10−33.00 × 10−2 (6.99 × 10−34.32 × 10−4 2.01 × 10−3 
 Desulfovibrionaceae 1.31 × 10−3 (4.10 × 10−49.15 × 10−3 (2.39 × 10−34.35 × 10−3 (1.21 × 10−33.91 × 10−4 2.01 × 10−3 
 Eggerthellaceae 2.22 × 10−3 (3.69 × 10−47.01 × 10−3 (1.18 × 10−32.25 × 10−3 (3.47 × 10−43.67 × 10−4 2.01 × 10−3 
 Helicobacteraceae 8.04 × 10−2 (1.28 × 10−24.47 × 10−2 (1.04 × 10−21.26 × 10−1 (1.87 × 10−29.95 × 10−4 3.48 × 10−3 
 Marinifilaceae 2.89 × 10−2 (5.44 × 10−31.13 × 10−2 (1.66 × 10−32.73 × 10−2 (4.44 × 10−38.73 × 10−4 3.48 × 10−3 
 Peptococcaceae 3.19 × 10−4 (6.51 × 10−51.13 × 10−4 (4.46 × 10−52.95 × 10−4 (8.24 × 10−58.71 × 10−3 1.63 × 10−2 
 Peptostreptococcaceae 3.20 × 10−3 (1.21 × 10−33.28 × 10−4 (1.46 × 10−41.00 × 10−2 (2.44 × 10−36.94 × 10−7 1.80 × 10−5 
 Prevotellaceae 1.38 × 10−1 (2.75 × 10−26.32 × 10−2 (8.57 × 10−31.12 × 10−1 (9.97 × 10−32.58 × 10−3 8.02 × 10−3 
 Saccharimonadaceae 1.57 × 10−2 (2.54 × 10−33.08 × 10−2 (3.41 × 10−36.35 × 10−3 (8.80 × 10−41.29 × 10−6 1.80 × 10−5 
 Streptococcaceae 1.25 × 10−3 (4.37 × 10−44.93 × 10−4 (9.65 × 10−51.72 × 10−4 (5.96 × 10−56.39 × 10−3 1.28 × 10−2 
 Sutterellaceae 1.45 × 10−2 (5.56 × 10−32.46 × 10−2 (4.57 × 10−33.24 × 10−2 (3.20 × 10−35.95 × 10−3 1.28 × 10−2 
 Tannerellaceae 5.37 × 10−2 (7.87 × 10−37.14 × 10−2 (9.97 × 10−33.24 × 10−2 (7.21 × 10−34.83 × 10−3 1.28 × 10−2 
Genus      
 Rikenellaceae: Alistipes 6.39 × 10−2 (7.60 × 10−32.91 × 10−2 (4.90 × 10−32.96 × 10−2 (3.61 × 10−31.04 × 10−3 3.29 × 10−3 
 Prevotellaceae: Alloprevotella 1.37 × 10−1 (2.76 × 10−24.88 × 10−2 (7.02 × 10−31.01 × 10−1 (1.01 × 10−22.88 × 10−4 1.83 × 10−3 
 Anaeroplasmataceae: Anaeroplasma 2.55 × 10−2 (5.69 × 10−38.12 × 10−3 (2.21 × 10−31.14 × 10−2 (1.46 × 10−35.24 × 10−3 1.30 × 10−2 
 Bacteroidetes: Bacteroides 1.47 × 10−1 (3.04 × 10−21.83 × 10−1 (1.65 × 10−21.14 × 10−1 (9.09 × 10−31.85 × 10−2 3.77 × 10−2 
 Clostridiaceae: Butyricicoccus 1.63 × 10−3 (6.27 × 10−42.05 × 10−4 (8.03 × 10−51.21 × 10−3 (2.59 × 10−46.34 × 10−5 5.17 × 10−4 
C. saccharimonas 1.57 × 10−2 (2.54 × 10−33.08 × 10−2 (3.41 × 10−36.35 × 10−3 (8.80 × 10−41.29 × 10−5 3.67 × 10−5 
 Clostridiaceae: C. sensu stricto3.96 × 10−3 (1.96 × 10−33.87 × 10−4 (3.21 × 10−41.33 × 10−2 (3.48 × 10−31.05 × 10−5 1.50 × 10−4 
 Proteobacteria: Desulfovibrio 1.02 × 10−3 (3.64 × 10−48.82 × 10−3 (2.41 × 10−34.20 × 10−3 (1.23 × 10−33.22 × 10−4 1.84 × 10−3 
 Eggerthellaceae: Enterorhabdus 1.44 × 10−3 (2.58 × 10−43.71 × 10−3 (7.55 × 10−41.57 × 10−3 (2.20 × 10−43.79 × 10−3 1.03 × 10−2 
 Helicobacteraceae: Helicobacter 7.90 × 10−2 (1.25 × 10−24.33 × 10−2 (1.02 × 10−21.24 × 10−1 (1.84 × 10−21.04 × 10−3 3.29 × 10−3 
 Eubacteriales: Intestinimonas 8.09 × 10−4 (1.34 × 10−42.27 × 10−3 (3.48 × 10−48.77 × 10−4 (9.55 × 10−51.80 × 10−3 5.39 × 10−3 
 Lachnospiraceae: Marvinbryantia 2.69 × 10−3 (8.47 × 10−46.32 × 10−3 (1.55 × 10−36.30 × 10−4 (2.91 × 10−41.75 × 10−5 2.00 × 10−4 
 Deferribacteraceae: Mucispirillum 1.93 × 10−2 (6.35 × 10−35.65 × 10−3 (2.32 × 10−33.00 × 10−2 (6.99 × 10−34.32 × 10−4 2.06 × 10−3 
 Porphyromonadaceae: Odoribacter 2.89 × 10−2 (5.44 × 10−31.13 × 10−2 (1.66 × 10−32.73 × 10−2 (4.44 × 10−38.73 × 10−4 3.11 × 10−3 
 Oscillospiraceae: Paludicola 1.04 × 10−4 (2.56 × 10−51.21 × 10−4 (5.75 × 10−53.00 × 10−4 (7.30 × 10−51.40 × 10−2 2.96 × 10−2 
 Bacteroidetes: Parabacteroides 5.37 × 10−2 (7.87 × 10−37.14 × 10−2 (9.97 × 10−33.24 × 10−2 (7.21 × 10−34.83 × 10−31.25 × 10−2 
 Sutterellaceae: Parasutterella 1.45 × 10−2 (5.56 × 10−32.46 × 10−2 (4.57 × 10−33.24 × 10−2 (3.20 × 10−35.95 × 10−3 1.41 × 10−2 
 Peptococcaceae: Peptococcus 3.19 × 10−4 (6.51 × 10−51.13 × 10−4 (4.46 × 10−52.95 × 10−4 (8.24 × 10−58.71 × 10−3 1.91 × 10−2 
 Prevotellaceae UCG 1 1.14 × 10−3 (9.72 × 10−41.44 × 10−2 (3.02 × 10−31.11 × 10−2 (2.07 × 10−34.46 × 10−4 2.06 × 10−3 
 Bacteroidetes: Rikenella 6.41 × 10−3 (9.18 × 10−41.50 × 10−2 (1.97 × 10−31.45 × 10−2 (1.21 × 10−31.18 × 10−4 8.39 × 10−4 
 Peptostreptococcaceae: Romboutsia 3.20 × 10−3 (1.21 × 10−33.28 × 10−4 (1.46 × 10−41.00 × 10−2 (2.44 × 10−36.94 × 10−7 3.67 × 10−5 
 Lachnospiraceae: Roseburia 2.55 × 10−3 (5.37 × 10−44.21 × 10−3 (1.60 × 10−39.73 × 10−3 (1.56 × 10−34.69 × 10−4 2.06 × 10−3 
 Streptococcaceae: Streptococcus 1.25 × 10−3 (4.37 × 10−44.93 × 10−4 (9.65 × 10−51.72 × 10−4 (5.96 × 10−56.39 × 10−3 1.46 × 10−2 
 Erysipelotrichaceae: Turicibacter 1.73 × 10−2 (6.46 × 10−32.00 × 10−4 (2.00 × 10−49.91 × 10−3 (2.25 × 10−32.13 × 10−6 4.05 × 10−5 
TaxaMean (Standard Error) Relative Abundancep Valueq Value
HLA-DQ8HLA-DR3HLA-DR3.DQ8
Phylum      
 Campilobacterota 8.04 × 10−2 (1.28 × 10−24.47 × 10−2 (1.04 × 10−21.26 × 10−1 (1.87 × 10−29.95 × 10−4 1.99 × 10−3 
 Deferribacterota 1.93 × 10−2 (6.35 × 10−35.65 × 10−3 (2.32 × 10−33.00 × 10−2 (6.99 × 10−34.32 × 10−4 1.15 × 10−3 
 Desulfobacterota 1.31 × 10−3 (4.10 × 10−49.15E-3 (2.39 × 10−34.35 × 10−3 (1.21 × 10−33.91 × 10−4 1.15 × 10−3 
 Patescibacteria 1.57 × 10−2 (2.54 × 10−33.08 × 10−2 (3.41 × 10−36.35 × 10−3 (8.80 × 10−41.29 × 10−6 1.03 × 10−5 
 Proteobacteria 1.45 × 10−2 (5.56 × 10−32.46 × 10−2 (4.57 × 10−33.24 × 10−2 (3.20 × 10−35.95 × 10−3 9.52 × 10−3 
Class      
 Campylobacteria 8.04 × 10−2 (1.28 × 10−24.47 × 10−2 (1.04 × 10−21.26 × 10−1 (1.87 × 10−29.95 × 10−4 1.99 × 10−3 
 Coriobacteriia 2.22 × 10−3 (3.69 × 10−47.01 × 10−3 (1.18 × 10−32.25 × 10−3 (3.47 × 10−43.67 × 10−4 1.08 × 10−3 
 Deferribacteres 1.93 × 10−2 (6.35 × 10−35.65 × 10−3 (2.32 × 10−33.00 × 10−2 (6.99 × 10−34.32 × 10−4 1.08 × 10−3 
 Desulfovibrionia 1.31 × 10−3 (4.10 × 10−49.15 × 10−3 (2.39 × 10−34.35 × 10−3 (1.21 × 10−33.91 × 10−4 1.08 × 10−3 
 Gammaproteobacteria 1.45 × 10−2 (5.56 × 10−32.46 × 10−2 (4.57 × 10−33.24 × 10−2 (3.20 × 10−35.95 × 10−3 9.92 × 10−3 
 Saccharimonadia 1.57 × 10−2 (2.54 × 10−33.08 × 10−2 (3.41 × 10−36.35 × 10−3 (8.80 × 10−41.29 × 10−6 1.29 × 10−5 
Order      
 Acholeplasmatales 2.55 × 10−2 (5.69 × 10−38.12 × 10−3 (2.21 × 10−31.14 × 10−2 (1.46 × 10−35.24 × 10−3 1.11 × 10−2 
 Burkholderiales 1.45 × 10−2 (5.56 × 10−32.46 × 10−2 (4.57 × 10−33.24 × 10−2 (3.20 × 10−35.95 × 10−3 1.12 × 10−2 
 Campylobacterales 8.04 × 10−2 (1.28 × 10−24.47 × 10−2 (1.04 × 10−21.26 × 10−1 (1.87 × 10−29.95 × 10−4 2.42 × 10−3 
 Clostridiales 4.99 × 10−3 (1.94 × 10−32.50 × 10−3 (8.39 × 10−41.81 × 10−2 (3.53 × 10−35.47 × 10−5 3.10 × 10−4 
 Coriobacteriales 2.22 × 10−3 (3.69 × 10−47.01 × 10−3 (1.18 × 10−32.25 × 10−3 (3.47 × 10−43.67 × 10−4 1.22 × 10−3 
 Deferribacterales 1.93 × 10−2 (6.35 × 10−35.65 × 10−3 (2.32 × 10−33.00 × 10−2 (6.99 × 10−34.32 × 10−4 1.22 × 10−3 
 Desulfovibrionales 1.31 × 10−3 (4.10 × 10−49.15 × 10−3 (2.39 × 10−34.35 × 10−3 (1.21 × 10−33.91 × 10−4 1.22 × 10−3 
 Peptococcales 3.19 × 10−4 (6.51 × 10−51.13 × 10−4 (4.46 × 10−52.95 × 10−4 (8.24 × 10−58.71 × 10−3 1.48 × 10−2 
 Peptostreptococcales_Tissierellales 3.40 × 10−3 (1.22 × 10−37.74 × 10−4 (1.68 × 10−41.02 × 10−2 (2.45 × 10−33.47 × 10−6 2.95 × 10−5 
 Saccharimonadales 1.57 × 10−2 (2.54 × 10−33.08 × 10−2 (3.41 × 10−36.35E-3 (8.80 × 10−41.29 × 10−6 2.19 × 10−5 
Family      
 Acholeplasmataceae 2.55 × 10−2 (5.69 × 10−38.12 × 10−3 (2.21 × 10−31.14 × 10−2 (1.46 × 10−35.24 × 10−3 1.28 × 10−2 
 Bacteroidaceae 1.47 × 10−1 (3.04 × 10−21.83 × 10−1 (1.65 × 10−21.14 × 10−1 (9.09 × 10−31.85 × 10−2 3.24 × 10−2 
 Butyricicoccaceae 2.33 × 10−3 (6.39 × 10−41.37 × 10−3 (3.02 × 10−43.24 × 10−3 (4.03 × 10−45.97 × 10−3 1.28 × 10−2 
 Clostridiaceae 4.99 × 10−3 (1.94 × 10−32.50 × 10−3 (8.39 × 10−41.81 × 10−2 (3.53 × 10−35.47 × 10−5 5.10 × 10−4 
 Deferribacteraceae 1.93 × 10−2 (6.35 × 10−35.65 × 10−3 (2.32 × 10−33.00 × 10−2 (6.99 × 10−34.32 × 10−4 2.01 × 10−3 
 Desulfovibrionaceae 1.31 × 10−3 (4.10 × 10−49.15 × 10−3 (2.39 × 10−34.35 × 10−3 (1.21 × 10−33.91 × 10−4 2.01 × 10−3 
 Eggerthellaceae 2.22 × 10−3 (3.69 × 10−47.01 × 10−3 (1.18 × 10−32.25 × 10−3 (3.47 × 10−43.67 × 10−4 2.01 × 10−3 
 Helicobacteraceae 8.04 × 10−2 (1.28 × 10−24.47 × 10−2 (1.04 × 10−21.26 × 10−1 (1.87 × 10−29.95 × 10−4 3.48 × 10−3 
 Marinifilaceae 2.89 × 10−2 (5.44 × 10−31.13 × 10−2 (1.66 × 10−32.73 × 10−2 (4.44 × 10−38.73 × 10−4 3.48 × 10−3 
 Peptococcaceae 3.19 × 10−4 (6.51 × 10−51.13 × 10−4 (4.46 × 10−52.95 × 10−4 (8.24 × 10−58.71 × 10−3 1.63 × 10−2 
 Peptostreptococcaceae 3.20 × 10−3 (1.21 × 10−33.28 × 10−4 (1.46 × 10−41.00 × 10−2 (2.44 × 10−36.94 × 10−7 1.80 × 10−5 
 Prevotellaceae 1.38 × 10−1 (2.75 × 10−26.32 × 10−2 (8.57 × 10−31.12 × 10−1 (9.97 × 10−32.58 × 10−3 8.02 × 10−3 
 Saccharimonadaceae 1.57 × 10−2 (2.54 × 10−33.08 × 10−2 (3.41 × 10−36.35 × 10−3 (8.80 × 10−41.29 × 10−6 1.80 × 10−5 
 Streptococcaceae 1.25 × 10−3 (4.37 × 10−44.93 × 10−4 (9.65 × 10−51.72 × 10−4 (5.96 × 10−56.39 × 10−3 1.28 × 10−2 
 Sutterellaceae 1.45 × 10−2 (5.56 × 10−32.46 × 10−2 (4.57 × 10−33.24 × 10−2 (3.20 × 10−35.95 × 10−3 1.28 × 10−2 
 Tannerellaceae 5.37 × 10−2 (7.87 × 10−37.14 × 10−2 (9.97 × 10−33.24 × 10−2 (7.21 × 10−34.83 × 10−3 1.28 × 10−2 
Genus      
 Rikenellaceae: Alistipes 6.39 × 10−2 (7.60 × 10−32.91 × 10−2 (4.90 × 10−32.96 × 10−2 (3.61 × 10−31.04 × 10−3 3.29 × 10−3 
 Prevotellaceae: Alloprevotella 1.37 × 10−1 (2.76 × 10−24.88 × 10−2 (7.02 × 10−31.01 × 10−1 (1.01 × 10−22.88 × 10−4 1.83 × 10−3 
 Anaeroplasmataceae: Anaeroplasma 2.55 × 10−2 (5.69 × 10−38.12 × 10−3 (2.21 × 10−31.14 × 10−2 (1.46 × 10−35.24 × 10−3 1.30 × 10−2 
 Bacteroidetes: Bacteroides 1.47 × 10−1 (3.04 × 10−21.83 × 10−1 (1.65 × 10−21.14 × 10−1 (9.09 × 10−31.85 × 10−2 3.77 × 10−2 
 Clostridiaceae: Butyricicoccus 1.63 × 10−3 (6.27 × 10−42.05 × 10−4 (8.03 × 10−51.21 × 10−3 (2.59 × 10−46.34 × 10−5 5.17 × 10−4 
C. saccharimonas 1.57 × 10−2 (2.54 × 10−33.08 × 10−2 (3.41 × 10−36.35 × 10−3 (8.80 × 10−41.29 × 10−5 3.67 × 10−5 
 Clostridiaceae: C. sensu stricto3.96 × 10−3 (1.96 × 10−33.87 × 10−4 (3.21 × 10−41.33 × 10−2 (3.48 × 10−31.05 × 10−5 1.50 × 10−4 
 Proteobacteria: Desulfovibrio 1.02 × 10−3 (3.64 × 10−48.82 × 10−3 (2.41 × 10−34.20 × 10−3 (1.23 × 10−33.22 × 10−4 1.84 × 10−3 
 Eggerthellaceae: Enterorhabdus 1.44 × 10−3 (2.58 × 10−43.71 × 10−3 (7.55 × 10−41.57 × 10−3 (2.20 × 10−43.79 × 10−3 1.03 × 10−2 
 Helicobacteraceae: Helicobacter 7.90 × 10−2 (1.25 × 10−24.33 × 10−2 (1.02 × 10−21.24 × 10−1 (1.84 × 10−21.04 × 10−3 3.29 × 10−3 
 Eubacteriales: Intestinimonas 8.09 × 10−4 (1.34 × 10−42.27 × 10−3 (3.48 × 10−48.77 × 10−4 (9.55 × 10−51.80 × 10−3 5.39 × 10−3 
 Lachnospiraceae: Marvinbryantia 2.69 × 10−3 (8.47 × 10−46.32 × 10−3 (1.55 × 10−36.30 × 10−4 (2.91 × 10−41.75 × 10−5 2.00 × 10−4 
 Deferribacteraceae: Mucispirillum 1.93 × 10−2 (6.35 × 10−35.65 × 10−3 (2.32 × 10−33.00 × 10−2 (6.99 × 10−34.32 × 10−4 2.06 × 10−3 
 Porphyromonadaceae: Odoribacter 2.89 × 10−2 (5.44 × 10−31.13 × 10−2 (1.66 × 10−32.73 × 10−2 (4.44 × 10−38.73 × 10−4 3.11 × 10−3 
 Oscillospiraceae: Paludicola 1.04 × 10−4 (2.56 × 10−51.21 × 10−4 (5.75 × 10−53.00 × 10−4 (7.30 × 10−51.40 × 10−2 2.96 × 10−2 
 Bacteroidetes: Parabacteroides 5.37 × 10−2 (7.87 × 10−37.14 × 10−2 (9.97 × 10−33.24 × 10−2 (7.21 × 10−34.83 × 10−31.25 × 10−2 
 Sutterellaceae: Parasutterella 1.45 × 10−2 (5.56 × 10−32.46 × 10−2 (4.57 × 10−33.24 × 10−2 (3.20 × 10−35.95 × 10−3 1.41 × 10−2 
 Peptococcaceae: Peptococcus 3.19 × 10−4 (6.51 × 10−51.13 × 10−4 (4.46 × 10−52.95 × 10−4 (8.24 × 10−58.71 × 10−3 1.91 × 10−2 
 Prevotellaceae UCG 1 1.14 × 10−3 (9.72 × 10−41.44 × 10−2 (3.02 × 10−31.11 × 10−2 (2.07 × 10−34.46 × 10−4 2.06 × 10−3 
 Bacteroidetes: Rikenella 6.41 × 10−3 (9.18 × 10−41.50 × 10−2 (1.97 × 10−31.45 × 10−2 (1.21 × 10−31.18 × 10−4 8.39 × 10−4 
 Peptostreptococcaceae: Romboutsia 3.20 × 10−3 (1.21 × 10−33.28 × 10−4 (1.46 × 10−41.00 × 10−2 (2.44 × 10−36.94 × 10−7 3.67 × 10−5 
 Lachnospiraceae: Roseburia 2.55 × 10−3 (5.37 × 10−44.21 × 10−3 (1.60 × 10−39.73 × 10−3 (1.56 × 10−34.69 × 10−4 2.06 × 10−3 
 Streptococcaceae: Streptococcus 1.25 × 10−3 (4.37 × 10−44.93 × 10−4 (9.65 × 10−51.72 × 10−4 (5.96 × 10−56.39 × 10−3 1.46 × 10−2 
 Erysipelotrichaceae: Turicibacter 1.73 × 10−2 (6.46 × 10−32.00 × 10−4 (2.00 × 10−49.91 × 10−3 (2.25 × 10−32.13 × 10−6 4.05 × 10−5 

Kruskal–Wallis test with Benjamini–Hochberg adjustment was performed on sample-scaled counts at a significance level of 0.05 to identify differentially abundant taxa. The q values are the padj.

The phyla Campilobacterota and Proteobacteria were significantly underrepresented in HLA-DR3, whereas Patescibacteria were overabundant. Within the Proteobacteria phylum, Helicobacter was depleted in HLA-DR3 compared with the other two groups. Several genera within the Firmicutes class were depleted in HLA-DR3 (Butyricicoccus, Romboutsia, and Turicibacter) whereas Intestinimonas was overabundant. Within the Bacteroidota phylum, both Alloprevotella and Odoribacter were significantly depleted. Additionally, Mucispirillum of the Deferribacterota phylum was significantly depleted. Other than Intestinimonas, the other genus significantly overabundant in HLA-DR3 was Enterorhabdus of the Actinobacteriota phylum (Figs. 4C, 5, 7; Table II).

FIGURE 7.

Differentially abundant bacteria in HLA-DR3.

Abundance values are sum scaled to one million. The three lines represent the lower quartile, median, and upper quartile from lowest to highest, respectively. Significance labels: *p < 0.05, **0.05 > p > 0.01, ***0.01 > p > 0.001, ****p < 0.001.

FIGURE 7.

Differentially abundant bacteria in HLA-DR3.

Abundance values are sum scaled to one million. The three lines represent the lower quartile, median, and upper quartile from lowest to highest, respectively. Significance labels: *p < 0.05, **0.05 > p > 0.01, ***0.01 > p > 0.001, ****p < 0.001.

Close modal

Interestingly, at the phylum level, the HLA-DR3.DQ8 group demonstrated significant overabundance of Campilobacterota, Campylobacteria, and Proteobacteria and depletion of the phylum Patescibacteria, mirroring the changes opposite to those observed in the HLA-DR3 group. At the genus level, however, most of the significant genera belong to the Firmicutes phylum. Within this phylum, Streptococcus and Marvinbryantia are depleted in HLA-DR3.DQ8 compared with the other two groups, whereas Roseburia, Paludicola, and Clostridium sensu stricto 1 were overabundant (Figs. 4C, 5, 8; Table II).

FIGURE 8.

Differentially abundant bacteria in HLA-DR3.DQ8.

Abundance values are sum scaled to one million. The three lines represent the lower quartile, median, and upper quartile from lowest to highest, respectively. Significance labels: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.001.

FIGURE 8.

Differentially abundant bacteria in HLA-DR3.DQ8.

Abundance values are sum scaled to one million. The three lines represent the lower quartile, median, and upper quartile from lowest to highest, respectively. Significance labels: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.001.

Close modal

We again used a random forest model to identify the most discriminatory bacteria between HLA-DQ8, HLA-DR3, and HLA-DR3.DQ8. Turicibacter, Roseburia, and Candidatus saccharimonas were the most important features in separating these groups, all with around a 4% mean decrease accuracy, respectively (Fig. 4D). Further analysis with LEfSe highlights four HLA-DR3–depleted genera with the greatest potential biological relevance, Alloprevotella, Helicobacter, Turicibacter, and Mucispirillum, with effect sizes greater than four (Fig. 4E). Bacteroides and Parabacteroides were also identified as having a high effect size, although they are significantly overabundant in HLA-DR3.DQ8 only when compared with HLA-DR3 (Fig 4E).

To examine potential mechanisms behind different disease phenotypes, functional analysis of these microbiomes was conducted from pathway profiles generated using PICRUSt2. Numerous pathways were significantly differentially abundant in the three groups (Supplemental Table I), including four pathways related to short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) (Fig. 9). Three of these pathways involved SCFA production and were increased in both HLA-DQ8 and HLA-DR3.DQ8 compared with HLA-DR3: TCA cycle VII (acetate producers) (adjusted p value [padj] = 4.3 × 10−3), l-lysine fermentation to acetate and butyrate (padj = 0.024), and succinate fermentation to butyrate (padj = 2.3 × 10−4) (Fig. 9). The fourth SCFA-related pathway, methanogenesis from acetate (padj = 2.0 × 10−4), was significantly more abundant in HLA-DR3.DQ8 compared with both HLA-DR3 and HLA-DQ8 (Fig. 9). There were also several pathways predicted by PICRUSt2 to be relatively more abundant in the HLA-DQ8 group compared with both HLA-DR3 and HLA-DR3.DQ8 (Supplemental Table I), and these are involved in the synthesis of widely prevalent proteins and biological compounds such as bacteriochlorophyll (pwy-5531 and pwy-7159) and polyamines (polyamsyn-pwy) and the degradation of nucleotides (pwy-6608 and pwy-6353). Overall, these results demonstrate an association of HLA class II polymorphisms with gut bacterial functions, including several SCFA metabolic pathways as well as methane production.

FIGURE 9.

SCFA metabolism and methane production differ between HLA-DQ8, HLA-DR3, and HLA-DR3.DQ8 mice.

Abundance values are sum scaled to one million. The three lines represent lower quartile, median, and upper quartile from lowest to highest, respectively. Significance labels: *p < 0.05, **0.05 > p > 0.01, ***0.01 > p > 0.001, ****p < 0.001.

FIGURE 9.

SCFA metabolism and methane production differ between HLA-DQ8, HLA-DR3, and HLA-DR3.DQ8 mice.

Abundance values are sum scaled to one million. The three lines represent lower quartile, median, and upper quartile from lowest to highest, respectively. Significance labels: *p < 0.05, **0.05 > p > 0.01, ***0.01 > p > 0.001, ****p < 0.001.

Close modal

Both genetic as well as environmental factors have been linked with a risk of autoimmune diseases. In MS, genetic factors account for only 30% of disease risk, whereas the remaining 70% is attributed to environmental factors. Development of disease only in a subset of individuals with susceptible HLA class II genes points toward an important role of GxE in disease susceptibility versus protection. Given that the gut microbiome has recently emerged as a potential environmental factor linked with MS risk, it is imperative to analyze its interplay with genetic factors, especially HLA genotypes. Our study shows that HLA class has a direct influence on the composition of gut microbiota as mice lacking MHC class II showed lower bacterial diversity. Additionally, transgenic mice expressing either single (HLA-DR3 or DQ8) or double HLA class II genes (HLA-DR3.DQ8) showed more distinct microbiota than AE-KO mice. Furthermore, clustering of the HLA-DQ8 microbiome with HLA-DR3.DQ8 rather than HLA-DR3 and severe disease in HLA-DR3.DQ8 mice points toward an important role of gut microbiota in disease modulation in EAE-susceptible HLA-DR3 mice. GxE have been proposed to play a significant role in disease susceptibility versus resistance (5), and our data suggest that such an interaction between HLA gene polymorphisms and gut microbiota contributes to disease outcome in MS.

The association of MHC class II genes with the risk of developing autoimmune diseases has been well described. MHC class II molecules play a central role in the maturation of T cells and thus can affect the autoreactivity of an individual’s T cell population (44). Indeed, multiple HLA genes in humans such as HLA-DR2, HLA-DR3, HLA-DR4, HLA-DQ6, and HLA-DQ8 have been associated with MS susceptibility (11, 45). We have previously used transgenic mice expressing MS-linked HLA class II molecules to authenticate the importance of HLA polymorphisms in the pathobiology of MS (14, 15, 4648).

Examining the relationship between HLA genotype and the microbiome, the current study showed that HLA class II molecules influence the composition of the gut microbiome. Specifically, we showed that the microbiome composition of AE-KO mice is distinct from transgenic mice expressing human HLA class II molecules (HLA-DQ8, HLA-DR3, and HLA-DR3·DQ8 mice). Additionally, the microbiome of AE-KO mice exhibits lower genus richness than HLA-DQ8, HLA-DR3, and HLA-DR3.DQ8 mice, suggesting an important role of MHC class II molecule in the selection of gut microbiota. In the absence of MHC class II molecule, mice are unable to maintain a diverse microbiome, allowing select bacteria to flourish at the cost of bacterial richness.

Our data also suggests that MHC class II polymorphisms might influence the selection of specific bacteria in the gut. Previously, using HLA class II transgenic mice, we have validated the importance of HLA class II genes in susceptibility versus resistance. Specifically, we found that HLA-DR3 mice are susceptible to disease, and HLA-DQ8 mice are resistant to disease. Interestingly, double transgenic mice expressing both HLA-DR3 and HLA-DQ8 developed more severe disease, suggesting that the disease-resistant HLA-DQ8 gene also has a modulatory effect on disease severity (14, 46, 47). Thus, we hypothesized that the gut microbiome might play an important role in disease susceptibility, resistance, and/or severity in the context of the HLA-DR3 or -DQ8 molecule. EAE phenotypes can be broadly described by three characteristics, disease susceptibility or resistance and disease severity. As HLA-DR3 and HLA-DR3.DQ8 mice were susceptible for disease, they might be selecting for bacteria with a potential role in disease susceptibility. Although HLA-DQ8 mice were resistant to disease development, the presence of HLA-DQ8 in a disease-susceptible background can worsen the disease. Thus, we argued that HLA-DQ8 may be selecting for bacteria that protect from the development of disease but also selecting for bacteria that can exacerbate existing disease. The distinct microbiome profile between HLA-DQ8 and HLA-DR3 bolsters the evidence that interaction between host genetics and microbiome composition may play a protective role in MS.

Desulfovibrio, Rikenella, and an uncultured genus of the Prevotellaceae family showed relatively higher abundances in disease-susceptible HLA-DR3 and HLA-DR3.DQ8 transgenic mice but were reduced in disease-resistant HLA-DQ8 mice. Desulfovibrio has previously been shown to be associated with the MS disease state (49), and other studies have shown that the abundance of Desulfovibrio is positively associated with symptoms and intestinal damage in dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)–induced colitis mice (50, 51). In one study comparing the microbiome of diabetic db/db mice with nondiabetic db/m mice, Rikenella was decreased in the gut microbiota of diabetic mice (52). Furthermore, this depletion was reversed upon oral administration of resveratrol, a compound that is shown to alleviate symptoms of diabetic nephropathy. Another study found a decrease in Rikenella in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients compared with controls and other gastrointestinal diseases (53). The depletion of an uncultured Prevotellaceae family member is interesting because Prevotella, another member of that family, has been characterized numerous times as being a member of a healthy microbiome (19, 54). It is possible that these two Prevotellaceae members may compete over shared resources, and a high abundance of Prevotella confers protection via suppression of this uncultured genus. The depletion of these three genera suggest a potential role in the conferring susceptibility to EAE, in which HLA-DQ8 may protect against EAE through suppression of these genera or the HLA-DR3 molecule may promote their growth in the other two groups.

In the disease-resistant HLA-DQ8 group, there was a higher relative abundance of Alistipes compared with the HLA-DR3 and HLA-DR3.DQ8 groups, and this genus has previously been found in decreased abundance in EAE mice (55) as well as diabetic mice (52). This suggests a potential protective role of Alistipes in certain inflammatory conditions including EAE. Meanwhile, the HLA-DR3 mice had relatively lower abundance of Helicobacter and Mucispirillum. Because of the clinical importance of the H. pylori in gastritis and peptic ulcer disease, many studies have focused on this species’ role in autoimmune diseases as well, including MS and EAE. Most of these studies have measured the presence of H. pylori using levels of serum anti–H. pylori Abs. Findings thus far suggest that H. pylori infection serves a protective role against the development of MS, and the level of seropositivity was also negatively associated with disease severity (56, 57). However, studies focused on the abundance of the Helicobacter genus in the gut microbiome of patients with inflammatory diseases have demonstrated an increase in Helicobacter associated with EAE and IBD and a decrease in butyrate-producing bacteria (55, 58). In fact, H. hepaticus and H. bilis have been comparable to the colitis-inducing chemical DSS in inducing IBD in mouse models (59, 60), and H. bilis abundance was associated with progression from IBD to colorectal cancer, suggesting a possible correlation with the severity of inflammation or duration of disease (61). Similarly, Mucispirillum has been consistently associated with the prevalence and severity of DSS-induced colitis (50, 62). The relative increase of these bacteria in both HLA-DR3.DQ8 and HLA-DQ8 suggests that the HLA-DQ8 molecule may select for bacteria with context-dependent roles disease exacerbation. Similarly, Butyricicoccus has been inversely correlated with MS symptoms and generally depleted in various inflammatory states including IBD (63, 64). Butyricicoccus is a known butyrate-producer in the human gut and is thus thought to be a generally beneficial bacteria, but one study suggests that these beneficial effects vary between individuals as a result of overall microbiome composition (65).

Alloprevotella, a close relative of Prevotella, was also significantly depleted in HLA-DR3 compared with the other two groups. Multiple studies have shown Prevotella to be depleted in MS patients and increased after treatment with disease-modifying drugs (18, 19). Similarly, in EAE, administration of P. histicola has shown significant improvements in EAE (42, 66). Similar findings have been shown in patients with MS, and Prevotella has also been found to be negatively correlated with disease severity (18, 19). The relationship between Alloprevotella and MS is much less studied, and thus far, studies have shown varying associations of this genus with inflammatory diseases (67, 68). Romboutsia, Odoribacter, and Turicibacter were all also relatively decreased in HLA-DR3. Although these bacteria have not been studied with relation to EAE or MS, they have been associated with various inflammatory diseases (69, 70).

Given the current findings in literature and our findings in this study, although bacteria such as Helicobacter and Mucispirillum are depleted in HLA-DR3 mice that experience moderate disease (Fig. 1), their overabundance in mice with severe disease (HLA-DR3.DQ8) suggest they may be correlated with disease severity. The similar abundance in HLA-DR3.DQ8 and HLA-DQ8 mice further suggests that these bacteria may be positively selected for by the HLA-DQ8 phenotype and thus may play a specific role in modulating disease severity but not prevalence of the disease itself.

There have been limited studies connecting Enterorhabdus and Intestinimonas, the two genera overabundant in HLA-DR3 mice, with autoimmune or inflammatory diseases. Two studies have isolated species of Enterorhabdus from the gut of colitis mouse models (71, 72), and a few other studies have found an association between Enterorhabdus and oxidative stress in mice (73, 74). Similarly, there are very limited studies examining the relationship between Streptococcus, Roseburia, C. saccharimonas, Paludicola, or C. sensu stricto 1 with autoimmune diseases. A few studies have shown Streptococcus to be overabundant in patients with MS and other inflammatory diseases (75, 76). Roseburia has been shown to be depleted in DSS-induced colitis and rheumatoid arthritis, and one study found that administration of R. intestinalis flagellin protein decreased the colitis-associated disease-associated index (77). The epistatic interaction between HLA-DR3 and HLA-DQ8 could be selecting for bacteria that may worsen existing disease, such as Roseburia, and suppressing bacteria that may be protecting or ameliorating disease, such as Streptococcus.

Because we have previously observed that HLA-DQ8 caused an increase in disease severity through the production of IL-17 and GM-CSF (14), we reasoned that gut microbiota can play an important role in the disease-modulating effect of HLA-DQ8 as the latter has been shown to regulate levels of Th17 cells in mice. A rapidly growing body of literature is elucidating the mechanistic connections between the gut microbiome and autoimmune diseases such as MS (78, 79). Another recent study demonstrated that a strain of the Erysipelotrichaceae family introduced into the gut of germ-free mice enhances the Th17 response, and a strain of Lactobacillus reuteri may present peptides that mimic myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (80). Additionally, H. hepaticus (increased in HLA-DR3.DQ8 mice at genus level) promotes the development of IL-17– and IFN-γ–producing CD4 T cells as a mechanism of causing colitis in mice (55, 81). Other species of Helicobacter, specifically H. hepaticus, can induce severe IBD disease through IL-12 and IL-23 production (82). Similarly, a few studies have shown Mucispirillum associated with increased Th1 responses and the proinflammatory cytokine MCP-1 in the pathogenesis of DSS-induced colitis in mice (62, 83). Additionally, Desulfovibrio is a significant contributor to hydrogen sulfide production in the gut, enabling mucosal inflammation (84, 85), and has also been shown to induce a Th17 response in germ-free mice (86). Thus, HLA-DQ8–selected gut bacteria can modulate disease through the induction of proinflammatory Th1 and Th17 pathways. Understanding how HLA polymorphisms affect the abundance of immunomodulatory bacteria in the gut could shed light on potential targets for affecting disease pathogenesis and progression.

Functional profiling with PICRUSt2 revealed differential abundance of four pathways related to SCFA metabolism. Interestingly, the pathways involved in generating acetate and butyrate had higher relative abundance not only in HLA-DQ8 but HLA-DR3.DQ8 as well. Butyrate is generally regarded as a protective metabolite in inflammatory diseases (8790). Although serum acetate has been associated with higher Expanded Disability Status Scale scores in MS (91), it can be further metabolized to butyrate by various gut bacteria (9295). However, the HLA-DR3.DQ8 group in this study possessed a uniquely high relative abundance of a pathway that uses acetate to generate methane, suggesting a potential shift toward higher gut methane-to-butyrate ratios compared with HLA-DQ8 and HLA-DR3. Previous studies have demonstrated increased methane production in a subset of MS patients using breath tests (18). Elevated gut methane has also been shown to increase colonic transit time (96, 97) and thus posited to increase nutrient absorption and heighten risk for obesity (98). Obesity is a known driver of systemic inflammation and has also been linked with higher Expanded Disability Status Scale scores in MS patients (99). These findings together raise the possibility that epistatic interaction between HLA class II alleles such as HLA-DR3 and HLA-DQ8 could contribute to MS susceptibility and severity via modulation of gut bacterial metabolic pathways. Potential relationships between inflammation and the pathways uniquely increased in HLA-DQ8 have yet to be elucidated.

There are some limitations to our findings on differences in the microbiome among different strains. As AE-KO, HLA-DR3, and HLA-DQ8 mice were maintained through inbreeding for a prolonged period, there is a possibility that the observed differences in microbiota among these genetically modified strains were due to so-called strain founder effect (100, 101). Previously, Goodrich et al. (101) showed that although different TLR-deficient mice strains and their respective wild-type littermate controls harbored distinct microbiota and post–antibiotic treatment, all strains had similar microbial community. Additionally, microbiota of mice within the same litter were more similar than mice from different litters. Based on these results, the study concluded that maternal transmission of the microbiome is dominant over TLR signaling. However, all HLA-DR3.DQ8 transgenic mice used in the study were from F1 cross between HLA-DR3 to HLA-DQ8 mice. Thus, future studies exploring the role of antibiotics on gut microbiota among different HLA transgenic lines or rederivation of these transgenic lines in a germ-free environment will be able to help in determining the precise role of strain founder effect on the composition of gut microbiota.

Previously, we have shown that HLA class II allele such as HLA-DR3 and HLA-DQ8 can modulate disease susceptibility, severity, and resistance through the modulation of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Future studies on dissecting the interaction between gut microbiota, immune system, cytokines, and disease phenotypes will help in better understanding the role of gut microbiome in the pathobiology of MS.

The sequences presented in this article have been submitted to the Sequence Read Archives (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA738522/) under accession number PRJNA738522.

This work was supported by a National Multiple Sclerosis Society grant (RG 5138A1/1T), a National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases grant (1R01AI137075-01), a National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences career development award (P30 ES005605), a Carver Trust Medical Research Initiative Grant, and a University of Iowa Environmental Health Sciences Research Center pilot grant. S.A. was supported by the Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine Emory Warner Fellowship, which provides medical students the opportunity to take a full year out of their medical school curriculum to work in a laboratory in the University of Iowa Department of Pathology. C.M.J. was supported by a scholarship from the Iowa Biosciences Academy and a National Institutes of Health Initiative for Maximizing Student Development R25 training grant (5R25GM058939).

The online version of this article contains supplemental material.

Abbreviations used in this article

AE-KO

MHC class II gene knockout

DSS

dextran sulfate sodium

EAE

experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

FDR

false discovery rate

GxE

gene–environment interaction

IBD

inflammatory bowel disease

LDA

linear discriminant analysis

LEfSe

LDA effect size

MS

multiple sclerosis

padj

adjusted p value

PCA

principal component for analysis

PLP

proteolipid protein

SCFA

short-chain fatty acid

1.
Sospedra
M.
,
R.
Martin
.
2005
.
Immunology of multiple sclerosis.
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
23
:
683
747
.
2.
Steinman
L.
1995
.
Multiple sclerosis. Presenting an odd autoantigen.
Nature.
375
:
739
740
.
3.
Waubant
E.
,
R.
Lucas
,
E.
Mowry
,
J.
Graves
,
T.
Olsson
,
L.
Alfredsson
,
A.
Langer-Gould
.
2019
.
Environmental and genetic risk factors for MS: an integrated review.
Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol.
6
:
1905
1922
.
4.
International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium. Electronic address: [email protected]
;
International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics
.
2018
.
Low-frequency and rare-coding variation contributes to multiple sclerosis risk.
Cell.
175
:
1679
1687.e7
.
5.
Montgomery
T. L.
,
A.
Künstner
,
J. J.
Kennedy
,
Q.
Fang
,
L.
Asarian
,
R.
Culp-Hill
,
A.
D’Alessandro
,
C.
Teuscher
,
H.
Busch
,
D. N.
Krementsov
.
2020
.
Interactions between host genetics and gut microbiota determine susceptibility to CNS autoimmunity.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.
117
:
27516
27527
.
6.
Olsson
T.
,
L. F.
Barcellos
,
L.
Alfredsson
.
2017
.
Interactions between genetic, lifestyle and environmental risk factors for multiple sclerosis.
Nat. Rev. Neurol.
13
:
25
36
.
7.
Willer
C. J.
,
D. A.
Dyment
,
N. J.
Risch
,
A. D.
Sadovnick
,
G. C.
Ebers
;
Canadian Collaborative Study Group
.
2003
.
Twin concordance and sibling recurrence rates in multiple sclerosis.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.
100
:
12877
12882
.
8.
Ramagopalan
S. V.
,
A. E.
Handel
,
G.
Giovannoni
,
S.
Rutherford Siegel
,
G. C.
Ebers
,
G.
Chaplin
.
2011
.
Relationship of UV exposure to prevalence of multiple sclerosis in England.
Neurology.
76
:
1410
1414
.
9.
Maccari
G.
,
J.
Robinson
,
K.
Ballingall
,
L. A.
Guethlein
,
U.
Grimholt
,
J.
Kaufman
,
C. S.
Ho
,
N. G.
de Groot
,
P.
Flicek
,
R. E.
Bontrop
, et al
2017
.
IPD-MHC 2.0: an improved inter-species database for the study of the major histocompatibility complex.
Nucleic Acids Res.
45
(
D1
):
D860
D864
.
10.
Zivadinov
R.
,
L.
Uxa
,
A.
Bratina
,
A.
Bosco
,
B.
Srinivasaraghavan
,
A.
Minagar
,
M.
Ukmar
,
S.
Benedetto
,
M.
Zorzon
.
2007
.
HLA-DRB1*1501, -DQB1*0301, -DQB1*0302, -DQB1*0602, and -DQB1*0603 alleles are associated with more severe disease outcome on MRI in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Int. Rev. Neurobiol.
79
:
521
535
.
11.
Dyment
D. A.
,
B. M.
Herrera
,
M. Z.
Cader
,
C. J.
Willer
,
M. R.
Lincoln
,
A. D.
Sadovnick
,
N.
Risch
,
G. C.
Ebers
.
2005
.
Complex interactions among MHC haplotypes in multiple sclerosis: susceptibility and resistance.
Hum. Mol. Genet.
14
:
2019
2026
.
12.
Amirzargar
A.
,
J.
Mytilineos
,
A.
Yousefipour
,
S.
Farjadian
,
S.
Scherer
,
G.
Opelz
,
A.
Ghaderi
.
1998
.
HLA class II (DRB1, DQA1 and DQB1) associated genetic susceptibility in Iranian multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.
Eur. J. Immunogenet.
25
:
297
301
.
13.
Marrosu
M. G.
,
F.
Muntoni
,
M. R.
Murru
,
G.
Costa
,
M. P.
Pischedda
,
M.
Pirastu
,
S.
Sotgiu
,
G.
Rosati
,
C.
Cianchetti
.
1992
.
HLA-DQB1 genotype in Sardinian multiple sclerosis: evidence for a key role of DQB1 *0201 and *0302 alleles.
Neurology.
42
:
883
886
.
14.
Mangalam
A.
,
D.
Luckey
,
E.
Basal
,
M.
Jackson
,
M.
Smart
,
M.
Rodriguez
,
C.
David
.
2009
.
HLA-DQ8 (DQB1*0302)-restricted Th17 cells exacerbate experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in HLA-DR3-transgenic mice.
J. Immunol.
182
:
5131
5139
.
15.
Das
P.
,
K. M.
Drescher
,
A.
Geluk
,
D. S.
Bradley
,
M.
Rodriguez
,
C. S.
David
.
2000
.
Complementation between specific HLA-DR and HLA-DQ genes in transgenic mice determines susceptibility to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.
Hum. Immunol.
61
:
279
289
.
16.
Ivanov
I. I.
,
K.
Atarashi
,
N.
Manel
,
E. L.
Brodie
,
T.
Shima
,
U.
Karaoz
,
D.
Wei
,
K. C.
Goldfarb
,
C. A.
Santee
,
S. V.
Lynch
, et al
2009
.
Induction of intestinal Th17 cells by segmented filamentous bacteria.
Cell.
139
:
485
498
.
17.
Colpitts
S. L.
,
E. J.
Kasper
,
A.
Keever
,
C.
Liljenberg
,
T.
Kirby
,
K.
Magori
,
L. H.
Kasper
,
J.
Ochoa-Repáraz
.
2017
.
A bidirectional association between the gut microbiota and CNS disease in a biphasic murine model of multiple sclerosis.
Gut Microbes.
8
:
561
573
.
18.
Jangi
S.
,
R.
Gandhi
,
L. M.
Cox
,
N.
Li
,
F.
von Glehn
,
R.
Yan
,
B.
Patel
,
M. A.
Mazzola
,
S.
Liu
,
B. L.
Glanz
, et al
2016
.
Alterations of the human gut microbiome in multiple sclerosis.
Nat. Commun.
7
:
12015
.
19.
Chen
J.
,
N.
Chia
,
K. R.
Kalari
,
J. Z.
Yao
,
M.
Novotna
,
M. M.
Paz Soldan
,
D. H.
Luckey
,
E. V.
Marietta
,
P. R.
Jeraldo
,
X.
Chen
, et al
2016
.
Multiple sclerosis patients have a distinct gut microbiota compared to healthy controls.
Sci. Rep.
6
:
28484
.
20.
Tremlett
H.
,
D. W.
Fadrosh
,
A. A.
Faruqi
,
J.
Hart
,
S.
Roalstad
,
J.
Graves
,
S.
Lynch
,
E.
Waubant
;
US Network of Pediatric MS Centers
.
2016
.
Gut microbiota composition and relapse risk in pediatric MS: a pilot study.
J. Neurol. Sci.
363
:
153
157
.
21.
Miyake
S.
,
S.
Kim
,
W.
Suda
,
K.
Oshima
,
M.
Nakamura
,
T.
Matsuoka
,
N.
Chihara
,
A.
Tomita
,
W.
Sato
,
S. W.
Kim
, et al
2015
.
Dysbiosis in the gut microbiota of patients with multiple sclerosis, with a striking depletion of species belonging to clostridia XIVa and IV clusters.
PLoS One.
10
:
e0137429
.
22.
Ochoa-Repáraz
J.
,
L. H.
Kasper
.
2014
.
Gut microbiome and the risk factors in central nervous system autoimmunity.
FEBS Lett.
588
:
4214
4222
.
23.
Zhang
K.
,
M. W.
Hornef
,
A.
Dupont
.
2015
.
The intestinal epithelium as guardian of gut barrier integrity.
Cell. Microbiol.
17
:
1561
1569
.
24.
Rescigno
M.
2011
.
The intestinal epithelial barrier in the control of homeostasis and immunity.
Trends Immunol.
32
:
256
264
.
25.
Jarchum
I.
,
E. G.
Pamer
.
2011
.
Regulation of innate and adaptive immunity by the commensal microbiota.
Curr. Opin. Immunol.
23
:
353
360
.
26.
Blacher
E.
,
M.
Levy
,
E.
Tatirovsky
,
E.
Elinav
.
2017
.
Microbiome-modulated metabolites at the interface of host immunity.
J. Immunol.
198
:
572
580
.
27.
Forbes
J. D.
,
G.
Van Domselaar
,
C. N.
Bernstein
.
2016
.
The gut microbiota in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.
Front. Microbiol.
7
:
1081
.
28.
Kåhrström
C. T.
,
N.
Pariente
,
U.
Weiss
.
2016
.
Intestinal microbiota in health and disease.
Nature.
535
:
47
.
29.
Kinross
J. M.
,
A. W.
Darzi
,
J. K.
Nicholson
.
2011
.
Gut microbiome-host interactions in health and disease.
Genome Med.
3
:
14
.
30.
Khan
M. A. W.
,
W. Z.
Stephens
,
A. D.
Mohammed
,
J. L.
Round
,
J. L.
Kubinak
.
2019
.
Does MHC heterozygosity influence microbiota form and function?
PLoS One.
14
:
e0215946
.
31.
Kubinak
J. L.
,
W. Z.
Stephens
,
R.
Soto
,
C.
Petersen
,
T.
Chiaro
,
L.
Gogokhia
,
R.
Bell
,
N. J.
Ajami
,
J. F.
Petrosino
,
L.
Morrison
, et al
2015
.
MHC variation sculpts individualized microbial communities that control susceptibility to enteric infection.
Nat. Commun.
6
:
8642
.
32.
Lin
P.
,
M.
Bach
,
M.
Asquith
,
A. Y.
Lee
,
L.
Akileswaran
,
P.
Stauffer
,
S.
Davin
,
Y.
Pan
,
E. D.
Cambronne
,
M.
Dorris
, et al
2014
.
HLA-B27 and human β2-microglobulin affect the gut microbiota of transgenic rats.
PLoS One.
9
:
e105684
.
33.
Madsen
L.
,
N.
Labrecque
,
J.
Engberg
,
A.
Dierich
,
A.
Svejgaard
,
C.
Benoist
,
D.
Mathis
,
L.
Fugger
.
1999
.
Mice lacking all conventional MHC class II genes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.
96
:
10338
10343
.
34.
Cardell
S.
,
M.
Merkenschlager
,
H.
Bodmer
,
S.
Chan
,
D.
Cosgrove
,
C.
Benoist
,
D.
Mathis
.
1994
.
The immune system of mice lacking conventional MHC class II molecules.
Adv. Immunol.
55
:
423
440
.
35.
Nabozny
G. H.
,
J. M.
Baisch
,
S.
Cheng
,
D.
Cosgrove
,
M. M.
Griffiths
,
H. S.
Luthra
,
C. S.
David
.
1996
.
HLA-DQ8 transgenic mice are highly susceptible to collagen-induced arthritis: a novel model for human polyarthritis.
J. Exp. Med.
183
:
27
37
.
36.
Abraham
R. S.
,
Y. C.
Kudva
,
S. B.
Wilson
,
J. L.
Strominger
,
C. S.
David
.
2000
.
Co-expression of HLA DR3 and DQ8 results in the development of spontaneous insulitis and loss of tolerance to GAD65 in transgenic mice.
Diabetes.
49
:
548
554
.
37.
Strauss
G.
,
D. A.
Vignali
,
G.
Schönrich
,
G. J.
Hämmerling
.
1994
.
Negative and positive selection by HLA-DR3(DRw17) molecules in transgenic mice.
Immunogenetics.
40
:
104
108
.
38.
Shahi
S. K.
,
K.
Zarei
,
N. V.
Guseva
,
A. K.
Mangalam
.
2019
.
Microbiota analysis using two-step PCR and next-generation 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
J. Vis. Exp.
(
152
):
10.3791/59980
.
39.
Douglas
G. M.
,
V. J.
Maffei
,
J. R.
Zaneveld
,
S. N.
Yurgel
,
J. R.
Brown
,
C. M.
Taylor
,
C.
Huttenhower
,
M. G. I.
Langille
.
2020
.
PICRUSt2 for prediction of metagenome functions.
Nat. Biotechnol.
38
:
685
688
.
40.
Arndt
D.
,
J.
Xia
,
Y.
Liu
,
Y.
Zhou
,
A. C.
Guo
,
J. A.
Cruz
,
I.
Sinelnikov
,
K.
Budwill
,
C. L.
Nesbø
,
D. S.
Wishart
.
2012
.
METAGENassist: a comprehensive web server for comparative metagenomics.
Nucleic Acids Res.
40
(
W1
):
W88
W95
.
41.
Dhariwal
A.
,
J.
Chong
,
S.
Habib
,
I. L.
King
,
L. B.
Agellon
,
J.
Xia
.
2017
.
MicrobiomeAnalyst: a web-based tool for comprehensive statistical, visual and meta-analysis of microbiome data.
Nucleic Acids Res.
45
(
W1
):
W180
W188
.
42.
Mangalam
A.
,
S. K.
Shahi
,
D.
Luckey
,
M.
Karau
,
E.
Marietta
,
N.
Luo
,
R. S.
Choung
,
J.
Ju
,
R.
Sompallae
,
K.
Gibson-Corley
, et al
2017
.
Human gut-derived commensal bacteria suppress CNS inflammatory and demyelinating disease.
Cell Rep.
20
:
1269
1277
.
43.
Mangalam
A. K.
,
D.
Luckey
,
S.
Giri
,
M.
Smart
,
L. R.
Pease
,
M.
Rodriguez
,
C. S.
David
.
2012
.
Two discreet subsets of CD8 T cells modulate PLP(91-110) induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in HLA-DR3 transgenic mice.
J. Autoimmun.
38
:
344
353
.
44.
Unanue
E. R.
,
V.
Turk
,
J.
Neefjes
.
2016
.
Variations in MHC class II antigen processing and presentation in health and disease.
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
34
:
265
297
.
45.
Barcellos
L. F.
,
J. R.
Oksenberg
,
A. B.
Begovich
,
E. R.
Martin
,
S.
Schmidt
,
E.
Vittinghoff
,
D. S.
Goodin
,
D.
Pelletier
,
R. R.
Lincoln
,
P.
Bucher
, et al
Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Group
.
2003
.
HLA-DR2 dose effect on susceptibility to multiple sclerosis and influence on disease course.
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
72
:
710
716
.
46.
Mangalam
A.
,
D.
Luckey
,
E.
Basal
,
M.
Behrens
,
M.
Rodriguez
,
C.
David
.
2008
.
HLA-DQ6 (DQB1*0601)-restricted T cells protect against experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in HLA-DR3.DQ6 double-transgenic mice by generating anti-inflammatory IFN-gamma.
J. Immunol.
180
:
7747
7756
.
47.
Luckey
D.
,
D.
Bastakoty
,
A. K.
Mangalam
.
2011
.
Role of HLA class II genes in susceptibility and resistance to multiple sclerosis: studies using HLA transgenic mice.
J. Autoimmun.
37
:
122
128
.
48.
Mangalam
A. K.
,
V.
Taneja
,
C. S.
David
.
2013
.
HLA class II molecules influence susceptibility versus protection in inflammatory diseases by determining the cytokine profile.
J. Immunol.
190
:
513
518
.
49.
Zhang
C.
,
M.
Zhang
,
S.
Wang
,
R.
Han
,
Y.
Cao
,
W.
Hua
,
Y.
Mao
,
X.
Zhang
,
X.
Pang
,
C.
Wei
, et al
2010
.
Interactions between gut microbiota, host genetics and diet relevant to development of metabolic syndromes in mice. [Published erratum appears in 2010 ISME J. 4:312–313.]
ISME J.
4
:
232
241
.
50.
Song
H.
,
W.
Wang
,
B.
Shen
,
H.
Jia
,
Z.
Hou
,
P.
Chen
,
Y.
Sun
.
2018
.
Pretreatment with probiotic Bifico ameliorates colitis-associated cancer in mice: Transcriptome and gut flora profiling.
Cancer Sci.
109
:
666
677
.
51.
Sun
J.
,
H.
Chen
,
J.
Kan
,
Y.
Gou
,
J.
Liu
,
X.
Zhang
,
X.
Wu
,
S.
Tang
,
R.
Sun
,
C.
Qian
, et al
2020
.
Anti-inflammatory properties and gut microbiota modulation of an alkali-soluble polysaccharide from purple sweet potato in DSS-induced colitis mice.
Int. J. Biol. Macromol.
153
:
708
722
.
52.
Cai
T. T.
,
X. L.
Ye
,
R. R.
Li
,
H.
Chen
,
Y. Y.
Wang
,
H. J.
Yong
,
M. L.
Pan
,
W.
Lu
,
Y.
Tang
,
H.
Miao
, et al
2020
.
Resveratrol modulates the gut microbiota and inflammation to protect against diabetic nephropathy in mice.
Front. Pharmacol.
11
:
1249
.
53.
Lopetuso
L. R.
,
V.
Petito
,
C.
Graziani
,
E.
Schiavoni
,
F.
Paroni Sterbini
,
A.
Poscia
,
E.
Gaetani
,
F.
Franceschi
,
G.
Cammarota
,
M.
Sanguinetti
, et al
2018
.
Gut microbiota in health, diverticular disease, irritable bowel syndrome, and inflammatory bowel diseases: time for microbial marker of gastrointestinal disorders.
Dig. Dis.
36
:
56
65
.
54.
Shahi
S. K.
,
S. N.
Freedman
,
A. C.
Murra
,
K.
Zarei
,
R.
Sompallae
,
K. N.
Gibson-Corley
,
N. J.
Karandikar
,
J. A.
Murray
,
A. K.
Mangalam
.
2019
.
Prevotella histicola, a human gut commensal, is as potent as COPAXONE® in an animal model of multiple sclerosis.
Front. Immunol.
10
:
462
.
55.
Li
X. L.
,
B.
Zhang
,
M. J.
Sun
,
C. C.
Bao
,
B. Y.
Yuan
,
Q. F.
Xie
,
L. J.
Wang
,
M. X.
Wang
.
2019
.
Mechanism of gut microbiota and Axl/SOCS3 in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.
Biosci. Rep.
39
:
BSR20190228
.
56.
Yao
G.
,
P.
Wang
,
X. D.
Luo
,
T. M.
Yu
,
R. A.
Harris
,
X. M.
Zhang
.
2016
.
Meta-analysis of association between Helicobacter pylori infection and multiple sclerosis.
Neurosci. Lett.
620
:
1
7
.
57.
Ranjbar
R.
,
S.
Karampoor
,
F. A.
Jalilian
.
2019
.
The protective effect of Helicobacter pylori infection on the susceptibility of multiple sclerosis.
J. Neuroimmunol.
337
:
577069
.
58.
Yu
W.
,
X.
Su
,
W.
Chen
,
X.
Tian
,
K.
Zhang
,
G.
Guo
,
L.
Zhou
,
T.
Zeng
,
B.
Han
.
2019
.
Three types of gut bacteria collaborating to improve Kui Jie’an enema treat DSS-induced colitis in mice.
Biomed. Pharmacother.
113
:
108751
.
59.
Willis
C. R.
,
A.
Seamons
,
J.
Maxwell
,
P. M.
Treuting
,
L.
Nelson
,
G.
Chen
,
S.
Phelps
,
C. L.
Smith
,
T.
Brabb
,
B. M.
Iritani
,
L.
Maggio-Price
.
2012
.
Interleukin-7 receptor blockade suppresses adaptive and innate inflammatory responses in experimental colitis.
J. Inflamm. (Lond.).
9
:
39
.
60.
Han
Q.
,
T. J. Y.
Kono
,
C. G.
Knutson
,
N. M.
Parry
,
C. L.
Seiler
,
J. G.
Fox
,
S. R.
Tannenbaum
,
N. Y.
Tretyakova
.
2020
.
Multi-omics characterization of inflammatory bowel disease-induced hyperplasia/dysplasia in the Rag2-/-/Il10-/- mouse model.
Int. J. Mol. Sci.
22
:
364
.
61.
Peng
W.
,
H.
Li
,
Y.
Xu
,
L.
Yan
,
Z.
Tang
,
A.
Hossein Mohseni
,
S.
Taghinezhad-S
,
X.
Tang
,
X.
Fu
.
2020
.
Association of Helicobacter bilis infection with the development of colorectal cancer.
Nutr. Cancer.
DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2020.1862253.
62.
Caruso
R.
,
T.
Mathes
,
E. C.
Martens
,
N.
Kamada
,
A.
Nusrat
,
N.
Inohara
,
G.
Núñez
.
2019
.
A specific gene-microbe interaction drives the development of Crohn’s disease-like colitis in mice.
Sci. Immunol.
DOI: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aaw4341.
63.
Reynders
T.
,
L.
Devolder
,
M.
Valles-Colomer
,
A.
Van Remoortel
,
M.
Joossens
,
J.
De Keyser
,
G.
Nagels
,
M.
D’hooghe
,
J.
Raes
.
2020
.
Gut microbiome variation is associated to Multiple Sclerosis phenotypic subtypes.
Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol.
7
:
406
419
.
64.
Facchin
S.
,
N.
Vitulo
,
M.
Calgaro
,
A.
Buda
,
C.
Romualdi
,
D.
Pohl
,
B.
Perini
,
G.
Lorenzon
,
C.
Marinelli
,
R.
D’Incà
, et al
2020
.
Microbiota changes induced by microencapsulated sodium butyrate in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
Neurogastroenterol. Motil.
32
:
e13914
.
65.
Geirnaert
A.
,
J.
Wang
,
M.
Tinck
,
A.
Steyaert
,
P.
Van den Abbeele
,
V.
Eeckhaut
,
R.
Vilchez-Vargas
,
G.
Falony
,
D.
Laukens
,
M.
De Vos
, et al
2015
.
Interindividual differences in response to treatment with butyrate-producing Butyricicoccus pullicaecorum 25-3T studied in an in vitro gut model.
FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.
91
:
fiv054
.
66.
Shahi
S. K.
,
S. N.
Jensen
,
A. C.
Murra
,
N.
Tang
,
H.
Guo
,
K. N.
Gibson-Corley
,
J.
Zhang
,
N. J.
Karandikar
,
J. A.
Murray
,
A. K.
Mangalam
.
2020
.
Human commensal Prevotella histicola ameliorates disease as effectively as interferon-beta in the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.
Front. Immunol.
11
:
578648
.
67.
Ren
W.
,
S.
Chen
,
L.
Zhang
,
G.
Liu
,
T.
Hussain
,
X.
Hao
,
J.
Yin
,
J.
Duan
,
B.
Tan
,
G.
Wu
, et al
2016
.
Interferon tau affects mouse intestinal microbiota and expression of IL-17.
Mediators Inflamm.
2016
:
2839232
.
68.
Sun
Y.
,
Q.
Chen
,
P.
Lin
,
R.
Xu
,
D.
He
,
W.
Ji
,
Y.
Bian
,
Y.
Shen
,
Q.
Li
,
C.
Liu
, et al
2019
.
Characteristics of gut microbiota in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Shanghai, China.
Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.
9
:
369
.
69.
He
H.
,
H.
Xu
,
J.
Xu
,
H.
Zhao
,
Q.
Lin
,
Y.
Zhou
,
Y.
Nie
.
2020
.
Sodium butyrate ameliorates gut microbiota dysbiosis in lupus-like mice.
Front. Nutr.
7
:
604283
.
70.
El Mouzan
M. I.
,
H. S.
Winter
,
A. A.
Assiri
,
K. S.
Korolev
,
A. A.
Al Sarkhy
,
S. E.
Dowd
,
M. A.
Al Mofarreh
,
R.
Menon
.
2018
.
Microbiota profile in new-onset pediatric Crohn’s disease: data from a non-Western population.
Gut Pathog.
10
:
49
.
71.
Clavel
T.
,
C.
Charrier
,
A.
Braune
,
M.
Wenning
,
M.
Blaut
,
D.
Haller
.
2009
.
Isolation of bacteria from the ileal mucosa of TNFdeltaARE mice and description of Enterorhabdus mucosicola gen. nov., sp. nov.
Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.
59
:
1805
1812
.
72.
Clavel
T.
,
W.
Duck
,
C.
Charrier
,
M.
Wenning
,
C.
Elson
,
D.
Haller
.
2010
.
Enterorhabdus caecimuris sp. nov., a member of the family Coriobacteriaceae isolated from a mouse model of spontaneous colitis, and emended description of the genus Enterorhabdus Clavel et al. 2009.
Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.
60
:
1527
1531
.
73.
Song
R.
,
J.
Yao
,
Q.
Shi
,
R.
Wei
.
2018
.
Nanocomposite of half-fin anchovy hydrolysates/zinc oxide nanoparticles exhibits actual non-toxicity and regulates intestinal microbiota, short-chain fatty acids production and oxidative status in mice.
Mar. Drugs.
16
:
23
.
74.
Feng
Y. L.
,
G.
Cao
,
D. Q.
Chen
,
N. D.
Vaziri
,
L.
Chen
,
J.
Zhang
,
M.
Wang
,
Y.
Guo
,
Y. Y.
Zhao
.
2019
.
Microbiome-metabolomics reveals gut microbiota associated with glycine-conjugated metabolites and polyamine metabolism in chronic kidney disease.
Cell. Mol. Life Sci.
76
:
4961
4978
.
75.
Zeng
Q.
,
X.
Junli Gong
,
C.
Liu
,
X.
Chen
,
H.
Sun
,
Y.
Li
,
C.
Zhou
,
Y.
Cui
,
Y.
Wang
,
Yang
, et al
2019
.
Gut dysbiosis and lack of short chain fatty acids in a Chinese cohort of patients with multiple sclerosis.
Neurochem. Int.
129
:
104468
.
76.
Schepici
G.
,
S.
Silvestro
,
P.
Bramanti
,
E.
Mazzon
.
2019
.
The gut microbiota in multiple sclerosis: an overview of clinical trials.
Cell Transplant.
28
:
1507
1527
.
77.
Wu
X.
,
S.
Pan
,
W.
Luo
,
Z.
Shen
,
X.
Meng
,
M.
Xiao
,
B.
Tan
,
K.
Nie
,
T.
Tong
,
X.
Wang
.
2020
.
Roseburia intestinalis-derived flagellin ameliorates colitis by targeting miR-223-3p-mediated activation of NLRP3 inflammasome and pyroptosis.
Mol. Med. Rep.
22
:
2695
2704
.
78.
Shahi
S. K.
,
S. N.
Freedman
,
A. K.
Mangalam
.
2017
.
Gut microbiome in multiple sclerosis: The players involved and the roles they play.
Gut Microbes.
8
:
607
615
.
79.
Marietta
E.
,
A. K.
Mangalam
,
V.
Taneja
,
J. A.
Murray
.
2020
.
Intestinal dysbiosis in, and enteral bacterial therapies for, systemic autoimmune diseases.
Front. Immunol.
11
:
573079
.
80.
Miyauchi
E.
,
S. W.
Kim
,
W.
Suda
,
M.
Kawasumi
,
S.
Onawa
,
N.
Taguchi-Atarashi
,
H.
Morita
,
T. D.
Taylor
,
M.
Hattori
,
H.
Ohno
.
2020
.
Gut microorganisms act together to exacerbate inflammation in spinal cords.
Nature.
585
:
102
106
.
81.
Morrison
P. J.
,
D.
Bending
,
L. A.
Fouser
,
J. F.
Wright
,
B.
Stockinger
,
A.
Cooke
,
M. C.
Kullberg
.
2013
.
Th17-cell plasticity in Helicobacter hepaticus-induced intestinal inflammation.
Mucosal Immunol.
6
:
1143
1156
.
82.
Kullberg
M. C.
,
D.
Jankovic
,
C. G.
Feng
,
S.
Hue
,
P. L.
Gorelick
,
B. S.
McKenzie
,
D. J.
Cua
,
F.
Powrie
,
A. W.
Cheever
,
K. J.
Maloy
,
A.
Sher
.
2006
.
IL-23 plays a key role in Helicobacter hepaticus-induced T cell-dependent colitis.
J. Exp. Med.
203
:
2485
2494
.
83.
Shintouo
C. M.
,
T.
Mets
,
D.
Beckwee
,
I.
Bautmans
,
S. M.
Ghogomu
,
J.
Souopgui
,
L.
Leemans
,
H. D.
Meriki
,
R.
Njemini
.
2020
.
Is inflammageing influenced by the microbiota in the aged gut? A systematic review.
Exp. Gerontol.
141
:
111079
.
84.
Guo
J.
,
X.
Han
,
J.
Zhan
,
Y.
You
,
W.
Huang
.
2018
.
Vanillin alleviates high fat diet-induced obesity and improves the gut microbiota composition.
Front. Microbiol.
9
:
2733
.
85.
Kushkevych
I.
,
D.
Dordević
,
M.
Vítězová
.
2020
.
Possible synergy effect of hydrogen sulfide and acetate produced by sulfate-reducing bacteria on inflammatory bowel disease development.
J. Adv. Res.
27
:
71
78
.
86.
Figliuolo
V. R.
,
L. M.
Dos Santos
,
A.
Abalo
,
H.
Nanini
,
A.
Santos
,
N. M.
Brittes
,
C.
Bernardazzi
,
H. S. P.
de Souza
,
L. Q.
Vieira
,
R.
Coutinho-Silva
,
C. M. L. M.
Coutinho
.
2017
.
Sulfate-reducing bacteria stimulate gut immune responses and contribute to inflammation in experimental colitis.
Life Sci.
189
:
29
38
.
87.
Archer
S.
,
S.
Meng
,
J.
Wu
,
J.
Johnson
,
R.
Tang
,
R.
Hodin
.
1998
.
Butyrate inhibits colon carcinoma cell growth through two distinct pathways.
Surgery
124
:
248
253
.
88.
Christl
S. U.
,
H. D.
Eisner
,
G.
Dusel
,
H.
Kasper
,
W.
Scheppach
.
1996
.
Antagonistic effects of sulfide and butyrate on proliferation of colonic mucosa: a potential role for these agents in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis.
Dig. Dis. Sci.
41
:
2477
2481
.
89.
Csordas
A.
1996
.
Butyrate, aspirin and colorectal cancer.
Eur. J. Cancer Prev.
5
:
221
231
.
90.
Inan
M. S.
,
R. J.
Rasoulpour
,
L.
Yin
,
A. K.
Hubbard
,
D. W.
Rosenberg
,
C.
Giardina
.
2000
.
The luminal short-chain fatty acid butyrate modulates NF-kappaB activity in a human colonic epithelial cell line.
Gastroenterology.
118
:
724
734
.
91.
Pérez-Pérez
S.
,
M. I.
Domínguez-Mozo
,
A.
Alonso-Gómez
,
S.
Medina
,
N.
Villarrubia
,
J. I.
Fernández-Velasco
,
M. A.
García-Martínez
,
E.
García-Calvo
,
H.
Estévez
,
L.
Costa-Frossard
, et al
2020
.
Acetate correlates with disability and immune response in multiple sclerosis.
PeerJ
8
:
e10220
.
92.
Duncan
S. H.
,
A.
Barcenilla
,
C. S.
Stewart
,
S. E.
Pryde
,
H. J.
Flint
.
2002
.
Acetate utilization and butyryl coenzyme A (CoA):acetate-CoA transferase in butyrate-producing bacteria from the human large intestine.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
68
:
5186
5190
.
93.
Diez-Gonzalez
F.
,
D. R.
Bond
,
E.
Jennings
,
J. B.
Russell
.
1999
.
Alternative schemes of butyrate production in Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens and their relationship to acetate utilization, lactate production, and phylogeny.
Arch. Microbiol.
171
:
324
330
.
94.
den Besten
G.
,
K.
van Eunen
,
A. K.
Groen
,
K.
Venema
,
D. J.
Reijngoud
,
B. M.
Bakker
.
2013
.
The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay between diet, gut microbiota, and host energy metabolism.
J. Lipid Res.
54
:
2325
2340
.
95.
Duncan
S. H.
,
G.
Holtrop
,
G. E.
Lobley
,
A. G.
Calder
,
C. S.
Stewart
,
H. J.
Flint
.
2004
.
Contribution of acetate to butyrate formation by human faecal bacteria.
Br. J. Nutr.
91
:
915
923
.
96.
Jahng
J.
,
I. S.
Jung
,
E. J.
Choi
,
J. L.
Conklin
,
H.
Park
.
2012
.
The effects of methane and hydrogen gases produced by enteric bacteria on ileal motility and colonic transit time.
Neurogastroenterol Motil.
24
:
185
190
,
e92
.
97.
Pimentel
M.
,
H. C.
Lin
,
P.
Enayati
,
B.
van den Burg
,
H. R.
Lee
,
J. H.
Chen
,
S.
Park
,
Y.
Kong
,
J.
Conklin
.
2006
.
Methane, a gas produced by enteric bacteria, slows intestinal transit and augments small intestinal contractile activity.
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.
290
:
G1089
G1095
.
98.
Basseri
R. J.
,
B.
Basseri
,
M.
Pimentel
,
K.
Chong
,
A.
Youdim
,
K.
Low
,
L.
Hwang
,
E.
Soffer
,
C.
Chang
,
R.
Mathur
.
2012
.
Intestinal methane production in obese individuals is associated with a higher body mass index.
Gastroenterol. Hepatol. (N. Y.).
8
:
22
28
.
99.
Stampanoni Bassi
M.
,
E.
Iezzi
,
F.
Buttari
,
L.
Gilio
,
I.
Simonelli
,
F.
Carbone
,
T.
Micillo
,
V.
De Rosa
,
F.
Sica
,
R.
Furlan
, et al
2020
.
Obesity worsens central inflammation and disability in multiple sclerosis.
Mult. Scler.
26
:
1237
1246
.
100.
Ubeda
C.
,
L.
Lipuma
,
A.
Gobourne
,
A.
Viale
,
I.
Leiner
,
M.
Equinda
,
R.
Khanin
,
E. G.
Pamer
.
2012
.
Familial transmission rather than defective innate immunity shapes the distinct intestinal microbiota of TLR-deficient mice.
J. Exp. Med.
209
:
1445
1456
.
101.
Goodrich
J. K.
,
S. C.
Di Rienzi
,
A. C.
Poole
,
O.
Koren
,
W. A.
Walters
,
J. G.
Caporaso
,
R.
Knight
,
R. E.
Ley
.
2014
.
Conducting a microbiome study.
Cell.
158
:
250
262
.

A.K.M. is an inventor of the use of P. histicola for treatment of autoimmune disease, and the patent is owned by Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN). The technology has been licensed by the Mayo Clinic to Evelo Biosciences. A.K.M. received royalties from Mayo Clinic (paid by Evelo Biosciences). The other authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

This article is distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 Unported license.

Supplementary data