Abstract
Platelet factor 4 (PF-4), a platelet-derived CXC chemokine, is known to prevent human monocytes from apoptosis and to promote differentiation of these cells into HLA-DR− macrophages. In this study, we investigated the role of PF-4 in the control of acute monocyte proinflammatory responses involved in the direct combat of microbial invaders. We show that PF-4 increases monocyte phagocytosis and provokes a strong formation of oxygen radicals but lacks a chemotactic activity in these cells. Compared with FMLP, PF-4-induced oxidative burst was later in its onset but was remarkably longer in its duration (lasting for up to 60 min). Furthermore, in PF-4-prestimulated cells, FMLP- as well as RANTES-induced burst responses became synergistically enhanced. As we could show, PF-4-mediated oxidative burst in monocytes does not involve Gi proteins, elevation of intracellular free calcium concentrations, or binding to CXCR3B, a novel PF-4 receptor recently discovered on endothelial cells. Moreover, we found that PF-4 acts on macrophages in a dual manner. On the one hand, very similar to GM-CSF or M-CSF, PF-4 treatment of monocytes generates macrophages with a high capacity for unspecific phagocytosis. On the other hand, short term priming of GM-CSF-induced human macrophages with PF-4 substantially increases their capability for particle ingestion and oxidative burst. A comparable effect was also observed in murine bone marrow-derived macrophages, indicating cross-reactivity of human PF-4 between both species. Taken together, PF-4 may play a crucial role in the induction and maintenance of an unspecific immune response.
Monocytes are members of the mononuclear phagocyte system and represent one of the most flexible cell types in immunology. Promonocytes leave the bone marrow and enter the blood, where they differentiate into mature monocytes. Under physiological conditions, the latter cells circulate for 3–4 days in the human blood and then emigrate into the tissue where they either differentiate into macrophages or dendritic cells or undergo apoptosis (1, 2). Although not terminally differentiated, blood monocytes are able to fulfill a variety of functions such as phagocytosis and killing of microorganisms, Ag presentation and the release of various mediators involved in the control of the immune response. Being transported by the blood stream, monocytes and polymorphonuclear granulocytes (PMN)4 are highly mobile and can accumulate rapidly at inflammatory sites. On the other hand, macrophages are constitutively present in most tissues. Therefore, mononuclear phagocytes together with PMN may serve as a first line of defense against microbial invaders. Such a scenario, however, requires not only the presence of phagocytes at the site of inflammation but also fast and effective mechanisms to activate these cells. Within this context, the role of platelet-derived chemokines is beginning to emerge. After platelet activation, blood leukocytes are the first cellular elements to become exposed to platelet release products (3, 4). A considerable proportion of these consists of two α-granule proteins that belong to the CXC subfamily of chemokines, platelet factor 4 (PF-4/CXCL4) and connective tissue-activating peptide III (CTAP-III/CXCL7). Both chemokines are absent in plasma, whereas they are found in serum at micromolar concentrations (5, 6, 7). We have shown recently, that both chemokines cooperate in the rapid activation of human PMN. Whereas CTAP-III represents a precursor that must be cleaved by neutrophil cathepsin G to generate the neutrophil-activating peptide 2 (NAP-2/CXCL7) which is then able to promote chemotaxis and phagocytosis in PMN, PF-4 acts directly on these cells, mediating their strong adherence to endothelial cells (EC) and the exocytosis of secondary granule contents (8, 9, 10, 11). The induction of distinct biological functions by either chemokine is explained by the usage of entirely different receptor types. Whereas NAP-2 binds to CXCR1 and CXCR2, two typical G protein-coupled seven transmembrane domain proteins, PF-4 was shown to interact with an integral chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan (CSPG) (12, 13, 14). Interestingly, we have identified CSPGs as binding sites for PF-4 also on human T cells, indicating that the interaction of PF-4 with CSPGs may represent a more general mechanism (15). Besides its untypical receptor, PF-4-induced biological functions are intriguing. Although being structurally a chemokine, PF-4 lacks chemotactic activity on neutrophils and T cells (15, 16). Apart from inducing short term responses on PMN, PF-4 is involved in long term differentiation and regulatory processes such as the control of EC and fibroblast proliferation (17, 18, 19) and the support of the survival of hemopoietic stem cells and progenitor cells (20). Moreover, PF-4 suppresses IL-2 mRNA transcription and the release of IL-2 in activated human T cells, corresponding to its inhibitory effect on T cell proliferation and release of IFN-γ (15). Further, we could show that PF-4 prevents human monocytes from spontaneous apoptosis and induces differentiation of monocytes into a specific subtype of macrophages (21). In contrast to GM-CSF-exposed or serum-derived macrophages, these cells were characterized by a total lack of surface-expressed HLA-DR Ag, whereas the costimulatory molecule B7-2 was found to be significantly up-regulated on the cell membrane. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of PF-4 in monocyte-mediated innate immune responses. Here we demonstrate that PF-4 is a potent activator of phagocytosis and of reactive oxygen radical formation in human monocytes as well as in human and murine macrophages. In addition, we provide first evidence that the molecular mechanisms controlling these functions are principally different from those utilized by typical chemotactic factors.
Materials and Methods
Cytokines
Human natural PF-4 was purified to homogeneity from release supernatants of thrombin-stimulated platelets in a three-step procedure as previously described (16). The preparations contained <0.125 ng of LPS per mg of PF-4 (i.e., below 4 pg/ml at 4 μM PF-4) as determined by the Limulus amebocyte lysate assay, ruling out possible side effects caused by contaminating LPS. PF-4 was lyophilized, stored at −80°C, and reconstituted to stock solutions of 1 mg/ml in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid before use. Recombinant human M-CSF was obtained from R&D Systems (Wiesbaden, Germany), and recombinant human GM-CSF, recombinant murine M-CSF, as well as recombinant human RANTES was from TEBU (Offenbach, Germany).
Preparation of human monocytes and generation of human and murine macrophages
Human mononuclear cells were isolated from peripheral blood of healthy volunteer donors by Ficoll-Paque (Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) gradient centrifugation. Monocytes and lymphocytes were separated by counterflow centrifugation as described earlier (22). The resulting monocyte fraction consisted of >95% CD14+ cells as determined by immunofluorescence staining with anti-CD14-specific mAb (Leu-M3, clone Mφ-P9; BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany). Human macrophages were generated from monocytes routinely by 3 days of culture in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS and 1% glutamine (all Biochrom, Berlin, Germany) in the presence of 10 ng/ml GM-CSF, 50 ng/ml M-CSF, or 4 μM PF-4. Maturation of cells was examined routinely by determining the expression of the macrophage marker carboxypeptidase M/MAX1 as published previously (21). Murine macrophages were raised from bone marrow-derived precursors of C57BL/6 mice as described (23). Briefly, bone marrow cells were obtained by flushing femurs with HBSS (Invitrogen Life Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany). To remove fibroblasts, the cells were cultured overnight on cell culture dishes (Nunc, Wiesbaden, Germany) with DMEM (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 10 mM glutamine, 10% FCS (Biochrom), and 50 ng/ml murine M-CSF. The nonadherent cells were collected in warm HBSS medium and cultured for 9 days in the presence of 50 ng/ml M-CSF.
Determination of intracellular free calcium and chemotaxis
RT-PCR
Total RNA from 5 × 105 cells was isolated using the SV total RNA Isolation System (Promega, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and was reverse transcribed using Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) and oligo(dT)12–18 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) as primer. PCR was performed using primers (Eurogentec, Seraing, Belgium) for human CXCR3B (25) and β2-microglobulin (β2m) as a housekeeping gene (β2m forward 5′-GCT GTG CTC GCG CTA CTC TC −3′, β2m reverse 5′-GCG GCA TCT TCA AAC CTC CAT-3′). PCR was performed in a total volume of 25 μl using 0.625 μM concentrations of each primer, 200 μM dNTP, and Taq DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs, Frankfurt, Germany) according to the manufacturer. For amplification of β2m, an initial preheating step (94°C for 2 min), the cycle program was set to denature at 94°C for 30 s, to anneal at 55°C for 30 s, and to extend at 72°C for 1 min for a total of 25 cycles. For the amplification of CXCR3B a Touch-Down PCR protocol was applied as previously described (26). Electrophoresis of the PCR products was performed on 2% agarose gels (Peqlab, Erlangen, Germany) containing ethidium bromide. Quantitative PCR was conducted on a LightCycler (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) using the LightCycler-DNA Master SYBR Green I kit (Roche) and primers described above. After amplification (denaturation at 94°C for 1 s, annealing at 54°C for 10 s for β2m and 59°C for 8 s for CXCR3B, and extension at 72°C for 5 s), melting curve analysis was performed to exclude the presence of confounding primer-dimers during quantitation. Semiquantitative comparisons of amplified products were made based on the crossing points obtained for each sample compared with a serially diluted, arbitrarily selected standard cDNA run in parallel. The obtained data were normalized by calculating the cDNA ratios of CXCR3B/β2m for each sample.
Oxygen radical formation and phagocytosis
Generation of reactive oxygen species by phagocytes was determined in a microplate luminometer (LB 96V; Berthold, Wildbad, Germany) by measurement of chemiluminescence in the presence of 60 μg/ml luminol (5-amino-2,3-dihydro-1,4-phthalazindione; Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) for monocytes or 90 μg/ml lucigenin (9,9′-bis(N-methylacridinium nitrate; Roche Diagnostics) for macrophages essentially as described elsewhere (22). Briefly, cells (106/ml) in CL medium (RPMI 1640 buffered with 25 mM HEPES without phenol red; Biochrom) supplemented with either luminol or lucigenin were distributed in 200-μl aliquots in an opaque 96-well microtiter plate (Nunc) and preincubated for 1 h at 37°C. After stimulation with PF-4, FMLP (Sigma-Aldrich), RANTES, or latex beads (7.5 × 106 particles in 10 μl of CL medium; Serva, Heidelberg, Germany), chemiluminescence was recorded for 30–90 min. In some cases, combinations of stimuli were used for the activation of cells. Furthermore, in some experiments, monocytes were preincubated for 90 min with pertussis toxin (PTX, from Bordella pertussis; Calbiochem, Bad Soden, Germany) at concentrations indicated before stimulation with PF-4. Data were expressed as relative light units (RLU) and quantified by integration over the time periods indicated in the text.
For measurement of unspecific phagocytosis, 2 × 105 cells were resuspended in 300 μl of CL medium and preincubated for 30 min at 37°C followed by addition of 2 × 106 FITC-conjugated monodisperse latex beads (1.83-μm diameter; Polyscience, Eppelheim, Germany) in 10 μl of CL medium. Beads were sedimented onto the cell layer by centrifugation (1 min, 300 × g) and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. After removal of free beads by centrifugation, the relative amount of ingested particles was quantified by flow cytometry, and data were expressed as median fluorescence intensity (MFI). Dead cells were excluded by double staining of cells with propidium iodide (1 μg/ml). In some experiments, cells were incubated for 5 min with different concentrations of PF-4 before the addition of latex beads.
Statistics
All experiments were performed three to five times with cells from different individuals and data are expressed, unless indicated otherwise, as mean of the replicates ± SD. Statistical significance was analyzed by the two-tailed t test.
Results
PF-4 lacks chemotactic activity on human monocytes but induces strong oxygen radical formation and increases phagocytic activity
Early reports claimed the ability of PF-4 to induce neutrophil and monocyte chemotaxis (27, 28). However, in a more recent report we have shown that, at least for neutrophils, highly purified PF-4 lacks such activity and that the previously observed effects were most likely due to contamination by other chemokines (16). In a first approach, we investigated the effect of a broad range of PF-4 concentrations (0.625–6.25 μM) on monocyte migration. Whereas monocytes responded vigorously to FMLP used here as a control (chemotactic index, 3.98 ± 0.67 at 10 nM FMLP), PF-4 at any concentration used failed to induce a specific or even a random migratory response above background levels (data not shown). From these results, it is evident that pure PF-4, even at high concentrations, lacks measurable chemotactic activity for human monocytes.
Because the capacity of cytokines to induce acute antimicrobial functions in monocytes is not necessarily coupled to their ability to promote chemotaxis, we performed a second set of experiments where we analyzed the capability of PF-4 to induce the formation of oxygen radicals over a wide range of stimulus concentrations. PF-4 dosages of 0.3 μM and higher provoked a dose-dependent formation of reactive oxygen metabolites (Fig. 1 A). Comparison of time kinetics between the PF-4-induced reaction and the one mediated by the typical chemotaxin FMLP revealed significant differences; whereas the FMLP-induced maximal response was observed after 1 min of stimulation and decreased to background levels during the following 10 min, PF-4-mediated oxidative burst was later in its onset (maximum levels after 15–30 min) but remarkably longer in its duration (lasting up to 60 min). Although peak levels of FMLP-induced responses are much higher than those mediated by PF-4, the overall response of the chemokine based on a time period of 60 min surmounted that of FMLP by far.
An effective combat of microbial invaders does not only involve the production of reactive oxygen species but also an increased capacity of taking up particles. Consequently, we analyzed phagocytosis of FITC-labeled latex beads by monocytes after priming with increasing concentrations of PF-4. As depicted in Fig. 1 B, PF-4 treatment not only increased the total number of phagocytosing cells (from 39% of unstimulated cells to 91% of cells primed with 4 μM PF-4) but also augmented the average amount of particles found within each phagocytosing monocyte (from MFI 60 with unstimulated cells to MFI 138 with cells stimulated with 4 μM PF-4).
PF-4-induced oxidative burst does not involve CXCR3B, Gi protein activation or mobilization of intracellular free calcium
The observed differences between FMLP and PF-4 in the induction of chemotaxis and oxidative burst suggested the involvement of different molecular mechanisms activated by the two stimuli. Stimulation of phagocyte functions by FMLP, chemokines, and other chemotactic stimuli is mediated through heterotrimeric G proteins and is accompanied by a rapid and transient increase in intracellular calcium concentration. Consequently, we analyzed the effect of the G protein inhibitor PTX on FMLP- and PF-4-induced respiratory burst. Whereas treatment of monocytes with PTX at a concentration of 40 ng/ml resulted in a complete inhibition of FMLP-mediated oxygen radical formation, concentrations up to 1000 ng/ml PTX had only a minor and statistically insignificant effect on PF-4-stimulated cells (Fig. 2,A). This weak reduction may be explained by side effects of the toxin on other G proteins indirectly involved in cell activation. Furthermore, different to FMLP, challenge of monocytes with PF-4 (4 μM) did not induce a mobilization of cytosolic calcium (Fig. 2 B). From these data, we conclude that signaling pathways involved in PF-4-mediated monocyte activation differ principally from those of chemotaxins such as FMLP or chemokines.
Most recently, an alternative splice variant of the CXCR3, termed CXCR3B, has been described as a functional receptor for PF-4 on EC. Different to other chemokine receptors, CXCR3B is not coupled to Gi but to Gs proteins and does not provoke a chemotactic response in EC (25). However, as shown by two independent approaches (Touch Down PCR-analysis as well as examination in the LightCycler system), EC but not monocytes, macrophages, or neutrophils express detectable amounts of CXCR3B mRNA (Fig. 3). On the basis of these observations, we exclude a potential role for this receptor in PF-4-mediated processes regarding to the latter three cell types.
PF-4 cooperates with the chemotaxins FMLP and RANTES in the generation of oxygen radicals in human monocytes
Differences between FMLP and PF-4 at the signaling level prompted us to examine whether both stimuli may cooperate in the induction of reactive oxygen metabolites. Because platelets beside PF-4 contain relevant amounts of RANTES (CCL5) (29), this chemokine was included in the following set of experiments. Cells were primed for 5 min with increasing concentrations of PF-4 and subsequently challenged with FMLP or RANTES at equipotent concentrations (100 and 500 nM, respectively). Burst rates were recorded for 60 min, and data were quantified by integration over this period of time. FMLP (Fig. 4,A) as well as RANTES (Fig. 4 B) cooperated synergistically with the chemokine in the induction of oxygen radicals with a first superadditive effect seen at 1 μM PF-4. Interestingly, enhancement of the PF-4 response by RANTES was ∼3.3-fold, whereas augmentation induced by FMLP was somewhat lower (2.1-fold). Moreover, cooperation between the stimuli also occurred when they were used in reverse order, i.e., when FMLP or RANTES were used as primers and PF-4 functioned as a second stimulus (data not shown).
In summary, our data demonstrate that PF-4 is a powerful inducer of acute proinflammatory responses in monocytes independently of Gi protein activation or calcium mobilization. Furthermore, PF-4 cooperates synergistically with chemotactic mediators like FMLP and RANTES in the release of oxygen radicals, which may play an important role in the combat against microbial invaders during an acute phase of infection.
PF-4-differentiated macrophages are professional phagocytes
We reported earlier that PF-4 prevents human monocytes from spontaneous apoptosis and induces the differentiation of monocytes into a specific subtype of macrophage lacking surface expressed HLA-DR (21). However, the functional properties of these cells remain to be elucidated. To this end, monocytes were differentiated to different types of macrophages by 3-day culture in the presence of either GM-CSF, M-CSF, or PF-4. The phagocytic activity of the resulting cell populations was monitored measuring their capacity for ingestion of FITC-labeled latex particles as described above. All three types of macrophages displayed an enhanced capacity for phagocytosis as compared with the unstimulated control (18% positive cells with an MFI of 64) (Fig. 5). Thus, 33% of GM-CSF and 57% of PF-4-treated cells were capable of particle uptake with both populations exhibiting a comparable particle load (MFI ∼100 each). The highest capacity for phagocytosis (MFI 280) was observed in M-CSF-generated macrophages, whereas the amount of active phagocytes (54%) was comparable with that found upon PF-4 stimulation.
PF-4 induces phagocytosis and the generation of oxygen radicals in human and murine macrophages
Host defense against microorganisms during an acute inflammatory process is not mediated by blood stream-derived monocytes alone but may also involve macrophages present in the surrounding tissue. To investigate whether PF-4 activates macrophages in a way similar to that observed for monocytes, priming experiments with GM-CSF-induced human macrophages were performed. Therefore, macrophages were primed with increasing concentrations of PF-4 for 5 min, followed by addition of latex-beads. The generation of reactive oxygen metabolites as well as latex particle uptake were recorded. Since the role of PF-4 in mice remains unclear, we evaluated a potential activity of human PF-4 on murine bone marrow-derived macrophages, which were analyzed in parallel.
Whereas in human macrophages individual oxidative burst rates induced by latex or PF-4 alone appeared to be rather low (0.9 to 1.1 × 106 RLU in maximum), PF-4 synergistically and significantly enhanced latex-induced oxidative burst rates from 1.3 × 106 RLU at 250 nM PF-4 to 9.2 × 106 at 8 μM PF-4 (Fig. 6,A). Furthermore, PF-4 priming elevated the amount of particles ingested by the phagocytes in a dose-dependent manner. This became first visible at 250 nM and was significant from 500 nM PF-4 on (Fig. 6,B). Different to human cells, PF-4 alone did not induce relevant oxidative burst in murine macrophages (Fig. 6,C). However, at dosages above 500 nM, PF-4 significantly increased the formation of oxygen radicals in response to latex. Enhancement of latex particle uptake after PF-4 priming was also seen in murine cells. Nevertheless, this cell type required substantially higher concentrations (≥ 4 μM) of PF-4 than human macrophages to induce a significant response (Fig. 6 D). Interestingly, PF-4 priming of human as well as murine macrophages did not increase the total number of active phagocytes but only the phagocytic activity of cells that were already capable of particle uptake. These data provide first evidence that human PF-4 activates murine macrophages in vitro at concentrations and in terms of functions comparable with those seen with PF-4 in human macrophages.
Discussion
In this study, we report on the discovery of novel biological activities of the platelet-derived CXC-chemokine PF-4 (CXCL4) for human and murine mononuclear phagocytes. On human monocytes, the chemokine mediates a strong increase in phagocytosis and a long-lasting formation of oxygen radicals, which can be synergistically enhanced in the presence of FMLP or RANTES. Furthermore, extended culture of monocytes with PF-4 results in the generation of macrophages with a high capacity for phagocytosis. Short term priming of human or murine macrophages with PF-4 resulted in a substantial increase in their ability for particle ingestion and latex-induced oxidative burst.
During acute vascular injury, successful defense of the host against microbial invaders depends on the rapid activation of neutrophils, monocytes, and macrophages. Therefore, the immediate presence of mediators initiating and coordinating the onset of an inflammatory process is required at the site of damage. A prominent source of such mediators are activated platelets, which are able to release chemokines and other factors prestored in their granules within minutes of activation (5). Although all three platelet-derived chemokines (RANTES, CTAP-III/NAP-2, and PF-4) are closely related in structure and sequence, they are able to fulfill quite different and complementary functions. Whereas NAP-2 predominantly attracts neutrophils (30, 31), RANTES is chemotactic for monocytes and T cell subpopulations (32). PF-4 activities differ principally from those of the other two chemokines. As we have shown recently, PF-4 is the only chemokine known thus far to rescue monocytes from apoptosis and induce their differentiation into a specific type of macrophage (21). In contrast to GM-CSF- or M-CSF-induced macrophages, PF-4-differentiated cells lack the expression of HLA-DR on their surface. However, the functions of this specific cell-type have remained unclear. Here we could show that PF-4-derived macrophages display a high capacity for unspecific phagocytosis (Fig. 5). Particle uptake of these cells was comparable with that found in GM-CSF-induced cells, whereas the amount of phagocytosing cells was as high as in M-CSF-generated macrophages. Thus, PF-4-differentiated macrophages may play an important role in the initiation and maintenance of an innate immune response without activating the specific immune system. Similar features have been reported for alveolar macrophages, which express low amounts of HLA-DR and, moreover, have the ability not to induce but instead to inhibit T cell activation (33, 34).
In contrast to growth factors like GM-CSF and M-CSF which are predominantly regulators of long term immune function, PF-4 is able to additionally stimulate immediate proinflammatory responses. As we were able to show, PF-4 directly induces a strong formation of oxygen radicals in human monocytes. However, the concentrations required for such a response (0.5–8 μM PF-4) are 5- to 50-fold higher as compared with those of other chemotactic factors like RANTES or FMLP. On the other hand, PF-4 is not secreted from cells after a prolonged stimulation but is released in extraordinary high amounts from activated platelets. Although no data are available for PF-4 concentrations directly at sites of acute platelet activation, normal serum contents of the chemokine (1–2.5 μM; Refs.5 and 35 and our own unpublished observations) would be sufficient to induce monocyte responses. Levels of PF-4 in plasma are below 1 nM, excluding an activation of cells under normal conditions. Furthermore, induction of monocyte oxidative burst and phagocytosis was observed in the same range of PF-4 concentrations as those reported to be required for monocyte differentiation or for the modulation of T cell and neutrophil responses (11, 15, 16, 21). The time kinetics of oxygen radical release differed remarkably between FMLP and PF-4. Whereas FMLP induced a sharp increase of radical formation which reached a maximum after 1 min and declined to background levels after 5–10 min, PF-4-induced responses were later in their onset but remarkably longer in duration (up to 60 min) (Fig. 1). The latter type of kinetics is rather unusual for soluble stimuli and is normally observed in conjunction with the uptake of particles like latex or zymosan (36). Interestingly, PF-4 is able to cooperate with chemotaxins FMLP and RANTES, leading to synergistic enhancement in the generation of reactive oxygen species (Fig. 4). Because formylated peptides are present at the sites of bacterial infections, augmentation by PF-4 of the host cell reaction toward these proinflammatory agents could contribute to reinforce monocyte responses against invading microorganisms. By contrast, RANTES can be produced by different cell types like T cells or macrophages (37, 38). Moreover, RANTES is stored in platelet α-granules and released together with PF-4 from activated platelets (29), which strongly suggests that cooperation between these chemokines may occur under physiological conditions. Cooperation of PF-4 in the induction of oxidative stress is not limited to soluble stimuli. In human and murine macrophages, PF-4 priming led to a synergistic dose-dependent augmentation of latex-induced oxidative burst (Fig. 6). Thus, our data provide evidence that PF-4 not only increases uptake of microorganisms but also elevates and improves their intracellular killing. Such mechanisms would fit precisely into a role for PF-4 as a first-line mediator of host defense.
Apart from its function in the generation of cytotoxic oxygen radicals, PF-4 plays a prominent role in the enhancement of monocyte and macrophage phagocytosis. PF-4 not only increased the number of monocytes taking up particles but also enhanced the amount of particles ingested by the cells. This was different from effects observed after PF-4 priming with GM-CSF-differentiated human or M-CSF-treated murine macrophages, where the number of active phagocytes remained constant and only their individual phagocytic activity was augmented (Fig. 6). PF-4 treatment of human phagocytes had no effect on receptor-mediated phagocytosis of IgG-coated erythrocytes (data not shown). This may be explained by the fact that during the initial steps of immune defense, no specific Abs are present and, thus, uptake of invaders must be processed predominantly by unspecific phagocytosis.
PF-4 displays several features that render it unique within the family of chemokines. As with neutrophils and T cells (15, 16), highly purified PF-4 lacks any chemotactic activity for monocytes. Controversial results reported in the past (27) may be explained by RANTES contamination of PF-4 preparations at that time, when purification methods were much less sophisticated than nowadays. Furthermore, in contrast to chemotaxins (12), PF-4-mediated activation of monocytes is transduced independently of PTX-sensitive Gi proteins and does not involve changes of intracellular calcium concentrations (Fig. 2). These data are in line with previous findings for PF-4 with NK cells, T cells, and neutrophils (15, 16, 39). Moreover, in the latter cell type, we could demonstrate, that the coordinated activation of Src kinases is an essential step in PF-4-mediated signaling (40). The participation of Gs proteins in PF-4-induced monocyte activation was not further considered in this study. The fact that pharmacological activation of this type of G protein by cholera toxin does not induce but rather inhibits oxygen radical formation in monocytes strongly argues against a potential role for Gs proteins in this process (41).
The structure and identity of PF-4-receptors on monocytes remain unclear. A promising candidate was the most recently discovered CXCR3B, an alternative splice variant of the CXCR3, which serves as a functional receptor for PF-4 on EC (25). However, this molecule was expressed neither on monocytes nor on neutrophils. We have shown previously that on human neutrophils a chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan specifically binds PF-4 and is involved in cell activation (14, 42), indicating that there may exist more than one receptor for the chemokine. The hypothesis of PF-4-binding to such a type of receptor is supported by our unpublished observation that heparin completely abolished PF-4-induced monocyte oxidative burst.
Glycosaminglycans, the carbohydrate side chains of proteoglycans, are highly conserved structures in biology. Furthermore, as compared with other chemokines, PF-4 displays an exceptionally high degree of sequence identity between isoforms of different species (43, 44), e.g., human and murine PF-4 share >64% identity on the protein level. This may explain why human PF-4 functionally cross-reacted with murine macrophages with an efficacy comparable with that of human cells. Our in vitro studies confirm observations from Sharpe et al. (45), who could induce an acute inflammatory response by injecting human PF-4 into mice in vivo. However, the effects on murine macrophages must be investigated in more detail. On the basis of our current data, we will continue our studies by examining the role of PF-4 in an appropriate mouse model in vivo.
Taken together, our results show that PF-4 acts as a powerful and versatile proinflammatory cytokine on mononuclear phagocytes. PF-4 affects these cells by several different mechanisms, including the direct induction of monocyte functions, synergistic enhancement of these functions in cooperation with other mediators, as well as the regulation of monocyte differentiation processes. Future attempts will be made to analyze the structure and signal transduction of PF-4-receptors.
Acknowledgements
We thank M. Fohlmeister from the Division of Immunobiology, Research Center Borstel, for the preparation of PF-4, and Dr. T. Grimm for supplying us with M-CSF. We acknowledge D. Heinrich (Division of Biochemical Immunology) and C. Engellenner (Division of Biological Chemistry) for technical assistance. We are indebted to S. Kroeger (Division of Molecular Infection Biology, Research Center Borstel) for performing quantitative PCR experiments.
Footnotes
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
This work was supported in part by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Sonderforschungsbereich 415, Projekt B6, and Graduiertenkolleg 288, Projekt B4.
Abbrevations used in this paper: CTAP-III, connective tissue-activating peptide III; MFI, median fluorescence intensity; NAP-2, neutrophil-activating peptide 2; PF-4, platelet factor 4; PMN, polymorphonuclear granulocyte; PTX, pertussis toxin; RLU, relative light units; CSPG, chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan; β2m, β2-microglobulin; EC, endothelial cell.