Chemerin, a ligand for the G-protein coupled receptor chemokine-like receptor 1, requires C-terminal proteolytic processing to unleash its chemoattractant activity. Proteolytically processed chemerin selectively attracts specific subsets of immunoregulatory APCs, including chemokine-like receptor 1-positive immature plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC). Chemerin is predicted to belong to the structural cathelicidin/cystatin family of proteins composed of antibacterial polypeptide cathelicidins and inhibitors of cysteine proteinases (cystatins). We therefore hypothesized that chemerin may interact directly with cysteine proteases, and that it might also function as an antibacterial agent. In this article, we show that chemerin does not inhibit human cysteine proteases, but rather is a new substrate for cathepsin (cat) K and L. cat K- and L-cleaved chemerin triggered robust migration of human blood-derived pDC ex vivo. Furthermore, cat K- and L-truncated chemerin also displayed antibacterial activity against Enterobacteriaceae. Cathepsins may therefore contribute to host defense by activating chemerin to directly inhibit bacterial growth and to recruit pDC to sites of infection.

Chemerin is a recently characterized chemoattractant protein that serves as a ligand for the seven-pass G-protein coupled receptor chemokine-like receptor 1 (CMKLR1) (1, 2). Two additional heptahelical receptors, GPR1 and CCRL2, have been reported to bind chemerin, although they do not appear to directly support chemotaxis (3, 4). Chemerin circulates as an inactive precursor (prochemerin) in blood and undergoes protease-mediated, C-terminal truncation to acquire chemotactic activity. Truncated, bioactive chemerin lacking 6 (chemS157), 8 (chemA155), or 9 (chemF154) amino acids in the C terminus have been isolated from several biofluids, including ascites, serum, and hemofiltrate, respectively (reviewed in Ref. 5). Serine proteases of the coagulation, fibrinolytic, and inflammatory cascades, including neutrophil elastase and cathepsin (cat) G, generate bioactive chemerin (6, 7). In addition, chemerin can be activated in a sequential manner by plasma carboxypeptidases after initial cleavage by plasmin (8).

Cells that are critical in linking the innate and adaptive immune responses, such as plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC), NK cells, and macrophages, express CMKLR1 and respond to chemerin through chemotaxis (1, 2, 912). Although the structure of chemerin has not yet been solved, the predicted structural homology between chemerin and inhibitors of cysteine proteinases (cystatins) and antimicrobial cathelicidins (1, 5) suggests that chemerin may inhibit endogenous human cysteine proteases and possibly exhibit antibacterial activity. Alternatively, host cysteine proteases may bind and proteolytically process chemerin. In support of the latter, we recently reported that the cysteine protease staphopain B (SspB) secreted by the human pathogen Staphylococcus aureus selectively cleaves and activates chemerin (13).

The papain-like cysteine proteases, including cat B, cat L, and cat K are well-known degradative enzymes of mammalian cells, participating primarily in intracellular proteolytic pathways (such as Ag processing and presentation), but also extracellular protein turnover. Recent studies show that lysosomal cathepsins can exert their proteolytic activity at extracellular sites (14, 15), where they contribute to a variety of pathophysiological processes, including chronic inflammation associated with obesity (1618).

Cathelicidins consist of two distinct domains: a highly conserved N-terminal cathelin-like domain with homology to the cystatins and a divergent C-terminal antimicrobial region that varies among species. Only one cathelicidin has been described in humans: human cationic antimicrobial peptide of 18 kDa (hCAP18). hCAP18 is cleaved by neutrophil serine proteases such as proteinase 3 to generate a 37-aa antimicrobial peptide LL-37 and a 103-aa cathelin-like domain (19, 20).

In this study, we found that although chemerin does not inhibit the proteolytic activities of cat L or K, these cysteine proteases are potent activators of chemerin. cat L and K initially and efficiently cleave prochemerin to release a 6-aa peptide from the carboxyl terminus, generating chemS157; the enzymes can also cleave chemerin to release a 38-residue C-terminal peptide, generating chemR125. The activated chemerin S157 is a potent attractant for CMKLR1+ cells, including human blood pDC. In addition, we demonstrate that although the smaller chemerin fragment generated by both cathepsins (chemerin R125) does not support chemotaxis of CMKLR1+ cells, both chemS157 and chemR125 display comparable antimicrobial activity against Enterobacteriaceae.

Recombinant cat B, L, and K, and chemS157 were purchased from R&D Systems. Anti-CD3, -CD14, -CD16, -CD19, -CD20, -CD56 biotin-linked mAbs, as well as FITC-labeled CD123 and allophycocyanin-labeled BDCA-2 were obtained from BD Pharmingen, Miltenyi Biotec, eBioscience, and BioLegend. Recombinant chemerin isoforms, full-length prochemerin, chemerin serum form (chemA155), and SspB-truncated chemerin (chem/SspB; chemS157) were produced as previously described (2, 13, 21). Recombinant Fc-chemerin proteins were produced and purified from Chinese hamster ovary cells via transient transfection and protein A purification. DNA fragments corresponding to the desired chemerin proteins were amplified by PCR and cloned in-frame downstream of human IgG1 Fc domain, which is downstream of a secretion signal peptide in mammalian expression vector pLEV113 (LakePharma). There is a 9-aa glycine-rich linker between the Fc and chemerin domains. Plasmid DNA was transfected into Chinese hamster ovary cells using Lafectine transfection reagent (LakePharma), and cell culture supernatant was collected 3 d posttransfection. Fc fusion proteins were purified with Protein A resins (Mab Select SuRe GE Healthcare), and final proteins were formulated in 100 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.45% NaOAc.

Inhibitory activity against cat B, K, and L was assayed fluorometrically using a Molecular Devices Gemini XS system, with an excitation of 350 nm and emission wavelength of 460 nm. Cathepsins were preactivated in a buffer containing 100 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM DTT, 1 mM EDTA, and 0.01% Tween 20 for 10 min at 25°C. Cathepsins (0.2 nM) were then incubated with 10 or 100 molar excess of recombinant prochemerin or the nonspecific cysteine proteinase inhibitor E64 for 30 min at 37°C in the same buffer containing the fluorogenic substrates Z-Phe-Arg-AMC (10 μM; Sigma) for cat B and L or Boc-VLK-AMC (10 μM; Peptides International) for cat K, in a total volume of 100 μl. The progress of the reaction was monitored by fluorescence spectroscopy, and the data were plotted versus time. Maximum velocity values were calculated by linear fit to the time-dependent curve. The residual cathepsin activity present in each treatment group is presented as a percentage of the maximum velocity determined in the absence of inhibitor (cathepsin + substrate only).

Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight spectrometry (MS) was performed by the Stanford Protein and Nucleic Acid Biotechnology Facility (Stanford University, Stanford, CA). After trypsin digest of the cat K and L truncated-chemerin band, MS was performed and the mass values were used in a Mascot search (http://www.matrixscience.com) of public peptide databases. PeptideCutter was used to predict the mass values of tryptic chemerin fragments (http://www.expasy.org). Mass values obtained after collision-induced dissociation (CID) of the predicted C-terminal peptide (f) were compared with the predicted CID mass values for the peptide corresponding to residues 141–157 of chemerin (sequence: AGEDPHSFYFPGQFAFS), using Mascot software (Matrix Science).

The Institutional Review Board at Jagiellonian University approved all human subject protocols. Human blood was collected and PBMCs were harvested after LSM1077 (PAA Laboratories) gradient separation, as described by the manufacturer. pDC were enriched from PBMC using negative selection with biotinylated mAbs directed against CD3, CD14, CD16, CD19, CD20, CD56, and anti-biotin MACS Microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec), according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Cells were blocked with 50–80% autologous plasma and then stained for flow cytometry analysis using mAbs against CD123 and BDCA-2 to identify pDC. Stained cells were analyzed on an LSRII flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson).

Cathepsins were incubated with recombinant human prochemerin for 10 min at 37°C and then tested in an in vitro chemotaxis assay using murine pre-B lymphoma L1.2 cells stably transfected with human recombinant CMKLR1 (CMKLR1/L1.2) or purified human blood pDC. In each case, enzymatic digestion was stopped by placing samples on ice and diluting with chemotaxis medium (RPMI 1640 containing 10% FBS). Where indicated, recombinant chemerin isoforms, Fc-chemerin fusion proteins, or Fc alone were used. A total of 100 μl cells (2.5 × 105 cells/well) was added to the top well of 5-μm pore transwell inserts (Costar), and test samples were added to the bottom well in a 600-μl volume. Migration was assayed for 2 h at 37°C. The inserts were then removed, and cells that had migrated through the filter to the lower chamber were collected and counted by flow cytometry (FACSCalibur; BD Biosciences). The results are presented as percentage input migration. CXCL12 served as a positive control.

Escherichia coli (HB101, a conventional laboratory strain) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (a clinical isolate from human bronchoalveolar lavage fluid) were used in this study. The antimicrobial activity of the indicated chemerin forms was estimated using a microtiter broth dilution assay (22). A single colony of bacteria was inoculated into 20 ml Mueller–Hinton broth (MHB; Difco) and incubated overnight at 37°C, subcultured once at 1:100 dilution in MHB, and then grown for 2–3 h to midlogarithmic phase. Cell numbers were calculated using previously determined standard curves, and for subsequent experiments, bacteria were used at 2–7 × 105 CFU/ml. Bacterial suspensions (90 μl) in MHB were mixed with 10 μl diluent (10 mM HEPES, 100 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.45% NaOAc, or MHB) (control) or 10 μl different concentrations of chemerin, Fc-chemerin fusion proteins, Fc alone, or synthetic LL-37 (Emory Microchemical Facility) and incubated at 37°C for the indicated times. After serial dilutions with MHB, the diluted mixture was plated on MHB agar plates and incubated at 37°C overnight for enumeration of CFU. In selected experiments, samples of the bacteria/peptide mixtures were also analyzed by flow cytometry and by spectrophotometry. These methods produced comparable results to the colony-forming assay (data not shown).

We initially tested chemerin for cystatin-like activity. Substrate hydrolysis by cat B, L, or K was not significantly inhibited by prochemerin, serum-form bioactive chemerin (chemA155), or SspB-activated chemerin (chemS157), even at 10:1 and 100:1 molar ratios of chemerin-to-cathepsin (Fig. 1, Table I). The general cysteine proteinase inhibitor E64 efficiently abolished the activity of all cathepsins examined (Fig. 1). Thus, chemerin does not appear to function as a cystatin.

FIGURE 1.

Chemerin does not inhibit the activity of the cysteine cathepsins. Cathepsins were incubated with 10 (10×) or 100 molar excess (100×) of recombinant prochemerin (pro-chem), serum chemerin (chemA155), or chem/SspB (chemS157), or 100 molar excess of the general cysteine proteinase inhibitor E64 for 30 min at 37°C with fluorogenic substrates. *p < 0.05, Student t test. Data are shown as mean ± SD of three independent measurements done in duplicate. Control contained no inhibitor.

FIGURE 1.

Chemerin does not inhibit the activity of the cysteine cathepsins. Cathepsins were incubated with 10 (10×) or 100 molar excess (100×) of recombinant prochemerin (pro-chem), serum chemerin (chemA155), or chem/SspB (chemS157), or 100 molar excess of the general cysteine proteinase inhibitor E64 for 30 min at 37°C with fluorogenic substrates. *p < 0.05, Student t test. Data are shown as mean ± SD of three independent measurements done in duplicate. Control contained no inhibitor.

Close modal
Table I.
Comparison of chemerin isoforms used in this study
Chemerin FormAbbreviationsC-Terminal Amino Acid SequenceaReferences
Prochemerin (full-length chemerin) Prochem 111 VLGRLVHCPIETQVLREAEEHQETQCLRVQRAGEDPHSFYFPGQFAFSKALPRS 163 7  
Serum form chemA155 111 VLGRLVHCPIETQVLREAEEHQETQCLRVQRAGEDPHSFYFPGQFAPH155 7, 21  
SspB-treated chemerin chem/SspB; chemS157 111 VLGRLVHCPIETQVLREAEEHQETQCLRVQRAGEDPHSFYFPGQFAFS 157 13  
 Minor form chemS148 111 VLGRLVHCPIETQVLREAEEHQETQCLRVQRAGEDPHS 148 13  
Cat L-treated chemerin, Cat K-treated chemerin chemS157 111 VLGRLVHCPIETQVLREAEEHQETQCLRVQRAGEDPHSFYFPGQFAFS 157 This study 
Cat L-treated chemerin, Cat K-treated chemerin chemR125 111 VLGRLVHCPIETQVLR 125 This study 
Chemerin FormAbbreviationsC-Terminal Amino Acid SequenceaReferences
Prochemerin (full-length chemerin) Prochem 111 VLGRLVHCPIETQVLREAEEHQETQCLRVQRAGEDPHSFYFPGQFAFSKALPRS 163 7  
Serum form chemA155 111 VLGRLVHCPIETQVLREAEEHQETQCLRVQRAGEDPHSFYFPGQFAPH155 7, 21  
SspB-treated chemerin chem/SspB; chemS157 111 VLGRLVHCPIETQVLREAEEHQETQCLRVQRAGEDPHSFYFPGQFAFS 157 13  
 Minor form chemS148 111 VLGRLVHCPIETQVLREAEEHQETQCLRVQRAGEDPHS 148 13  
Cat L-treated chemerin, Cat K-treated chemerin chemS157 111 VLGRLVHCPIETQVLREAEEHQETQCLRVQRAGEDPHSFYFPGQFAFS 157 This study 
Cat L-treated chemerin, Cat K-treated chemerin chemR125 111 VLGRLVHCPIETQVLR 125 This study 
a

Residue position is italic. Nonnative amino acids are shown in bold.

Prochemerin was incubated with purified cat B, L, or K and tested for attractant activity to test whether prochemerin is a substrate for human cysteine proteases. A controlled digest of prochemerin, using low concentrations of either cat L or K (1000-fold less than prochemerin) generated a single primary proteolytic product (Fig. 2A). Two apparent cleavage products were generated when cat L and K concentrations were increased 10–50 times, suggesting further digestion of prochemerin. Under similar conditions, cat B did not cleave prochemerin (data not shown). Interestingly, the two specific >10-kDa chemerin cleavage products generated by cat L and K can be distinguished by PAGE only under reducing conditions (Fig. 2A). Because prochemerin contains three disulfide bonds, these data suggest that under nonreducing conditions, the dual-cleaved chemerin products remain associated with the holo-molecule through S–S bond(s).

FIGURE 2.

cat L- and K-activated chemerin triggers CMKLR1/L1.2 cell and human blood pDC chemotaxis. A, Various concentrations of cat L or K were incubated with 2.9 μM chemerin, and the resulting products were separated by SDS-PAGE under either reducing (left panel) or nonreducing (right panel) conditions. Arrowheads indicate the two predominant chemerin cleavage products (two-pointed arrowheads signify the larger, three-pointed arrowheads signify the smaller cleavage products). Representative of n = 3 performed with similar results. B and C, cat K- or L-activated chemerin was tested in in vitro transwell chemotaxis using CMKLR1/L1.2 transfectants (B) or human blood pDC (C). The chemerin samples described in A were diluted to a final concentration of 1 nM and tested in chemotaxis assays. CXCL12 (10 nM) was used as a positive control for pDC chemotaxis (C). The mean ± SD from duplicate wells of three or four experiments is shown. *p < 0.05 by Student t test comparing cathepsin-treated chemerin versus prochemerin, or CXCL12 versus (−) control.

FIGURE 2.

cat L- and K-activated chemerin triggers CMKLR1/L1.2 cell and human blood pDC chemotaxis. A, Various concentrations of cat L or K were incubated with 2.9 μM chemerin, and the resulting products were separated by SDS-PAGE under either reducing (left panel) or nonreducing (right panel) conditions. Arrowheads indicate the two predominant chemerin cleavage products (two-pointed arrowheads signify the larger, three-pointed arrowheads signify the smaller cleavage products). Representative of n = 3 performed with similar results. B and C, cat K- or L-activated chemerin was tested in in vitro transwell chemotaxis using CMKLR1/L1.2 transfectants (B) or human blood pDC (C). The chemerin samples described in A were diluted to a final concentration of 1 nM and tested in chemotaxis assays. CXCL12 (10 nM) was used as a positive control for pDC chemotaxis (C). The mean ± SD from duplicate wells of three or four experiments is shown. *p < 0.05 by Student t test comparing cathepsin-treated chemerin versus prochemerin, or CXCL12 versus (−) control.

Close modal

CMKLR1-transfected L1.2 cells migrated significantly to cat L- or K-treated prochemerin (Fig. 2B). The chemotactic response of CMKLR1/L1.2 transfectants was dependent on cathepsin concentration, with cat L and K eliciting maximal effects on chemerin-mediated migration at a 1:100 prochemerin/cathepsin ratio (Fig. 2B). Although chemerin treated with cat L appeared to elicit slightly higher chemotactic response compared with cat K-treated chemerin (Fig. 2B), the difference was not statistically significant. Freshly isolated CMKLR1+ human blood pDC also migrated in response to cathepsin-cleaved chemerin, suggesting that these enzymes may be involved in pDC recruitment (Fig. 2C). No cell migration was detected in the absence of chemerin, or when prochemerin or the cathepsins were tested alone (Fig. 2). Compared with cat L and K, cat B had negligible effects on chemerin chemoattractant activity (data not shown). Taken together, these data suggest that incubation of cat L and K with prochemerin results in generation of bioactive chemerin chemoattractant.

We used MS to determine the cathepsin chemerin cleavage sites. The mass value for the larger chemerin cleavage product initially and efficiently generated by cat L and K (experimental mass [M+H]+, 16,152 Da; calculated mass [M+H]+, 16,155 Da; Δ mass, 3 Da) corresponds to chemerin residues 18–157 (ADPELT……GQFAFS, chem157S). The larger protein band (indicated by arrowheads in Fig. 2A) was isolated, digested with trypsin, and analyzed by mass spectrometry to confirm the processing site. A peptide fragment with a mass value of 1903.8 Da was identified, corresponding to a nontryptic peptide comprising amino acids 141–157 from the C terminus of chemerin (Fig. 3A, 3B). This peptide confirmed the initial and predominant cat K- and l-mediated chemerin cleavage site as NH2..AFS↓KAL..COOH. Further microsequencing of this peptide by CID (tandem MS/MS) confirmed the sequence (Fig. 3C). Interestingly, this cleavage site is identical to a previously identified endogenous active human chemerin isoform isolated from ascites fluid (1), and to a main chemerin isoform generated by the S. aureus-secreted cysteine protease SspB (chem/SspB; Table I).

FIGURE 3.

Identification of the chemerin cat K and L processing site. Prochemerin was incubated with cat L and K, and the resulting peptide fragments were resolved by SDS-PAGE. The larger chemerin bands (upper bands indicated by two-pointed arrowheads in Fig. 2A) were digested with trypsin and subjected to MS analysis. A, Peptide fragments corresponding to predicted tryptic chemerin mass values are labeled with their mass values (a–f). Asterisk indicates carbamidomethyl modification of cysteine. B, The peptides corresponding to the chemerin fragments identified by MS are underlined and lettered (a–f). Vertical bars indicate predicted trypsin cleavage sites. The N-terminal signal peptide is indicated by italics, as is the C-terminal peptide released on cathepsin cleavage. The carboxy terminus of truncated chemerin is nontryptic C-terminal peptide (f). C, CID mass spectra (tandem MS/MS analysis) of peptide (f) confirms the sequence identity of the nontryptic C-terminal peptide. The major intensity peaks are predicted b or y series ions.

FIGURE 3.

Identification of the chemerin cat K and L processing site. Prochemerin was incubated with cat L and K, and the resulting peptide fragments were resolved by SDS-PAGE. The larger chemerin bands (upper bands indicated by two-pointed arrowheads in Fig. 2A) were digested with trypsin and subjected to MS analysis. A, Peptide fragments corresponding to predicted tryptic chemerin mass values are labeled with their mass values (a–f). Asterisk indicates carbamidomethyl modification of cysteine. B, The peptides corresponding to the chemerin fragments identified by MS are underlined and lettered (a–f). Vertical bars indicate predicted trypsin cleavage sites. The N-terminal signal peptide is indicated by italics, as is the C-terminal peptide released on cathepsin cleavage. The carboxy terminus of truncated chemerin is nontryptic C-terminal peptide (f). C, CID mass spectra (tandem MS/MS analysis) of peptide (f) confirms the sequence identity of the nontryptic C-terminal peptide. The major intensity peaks are predicted b or y series ions.

Close modal

The mass value for the smaller chemerin cleavage product generated by cat L and K (experimental mass [M+H]+, 12,442 Da; calculated mass [M+H]+, 12,437 Da; Δ mass, 5 Da) corresponds to chemerin residues 18–125 (ADPELT……ETQVLR, chemR125). MS and CID analysis of the tryptic digests confirmed that the most distal tryptic or nontryptic fragment was “LVHCPIETQVLR” (fragment d in Fig. 3B, data not shown). Thus, prolonged incubation (data not shown) or incubation with 10–50 times higher concentrations of cat K or L (Fig. 2A) cleaves chemerin at position NH2..QVLR↓EAEE..COOH, and the released C-terminal peptide likely remains linked to the holo-molecule through a disulfide bond, as indicated by Fig. 2A.

Because separation of the smaller cleavage product by HPLC required reducing the S-S bonds, which would likely alter its secondary structure and possibly bioactivity, to determine the relative biological activities of the two cathepsin-generated chemerin products, we generated recombinant Fc-chemerins, abbreviated further as Fc-chemS157 (the larger cleavage product) and Fc-chemR125 (the smaller cleavage product). The Fc-chemerins have a glycine linker on the N terminus that is connected to the Fc domain of human IgG1; thus, the C terminus of the Fc-chemerin fusion proteins remained native. Fc alone or Fc-chemR125 failed to trigger CMKLR1+ cell migration at every concentration tested (up to 50 nM) (Fig. 4). However, chemS157 was the most potent attractant for CMKLR1+ cells, with 1 nM eliciting a maximum 42 ± 8% cell migration. Recombinant, commercially available chemerin S157 and HPLC-purified chemerin cleavage product of SspB (13) were used interchangeably as chemS157, because both gave similar results in chemotaxis assays (data not shown). In previous work, we and others have shown that chemS157 is a chemoattractant for pDC, NK cells, and monocyte-derived dendritic cells and macrophages (1, 11, 13).

FIGURE 4.

Chemerin S157 is the most active chemoattractant chemerin. CMKLR1/L1.2 cell migration to the indicated doses of the indicated chemerin isoforms was assessed by in vitro transwell chemotaxis. Migration to media only or to Fc only (tested at molar concentrations equivalent to the Fc-chemerin fusion proteins) are shown as negative controls. The mean ± SD from three experiments is shown. Statistically significant differences between media or Fc-control and the chemerin isoforms are indicated by asterisks. *p < 0.05, Student t test.

FIGURE 4.

Chemerin S157 is the most active chemoattractant chemerin. CMKLR1/L1.2 cell migration to the indicated doses of the indicated chemerin isoforms was assessed by in vitro transwell chemotaxis. Migration to media only or to Fc only (tested at molar concentrations equivalent to the Fc-chemerin fusion proteins) are shown as negative controls. The mean ± SD from three experiments is shown. Statistically significant differences between media or Fc-control and the chemerin isoforms are indicated by asterisks. *p < 0.05, Student t test.

Close modal

The Fc-chemS157 fusion protein also triggered statistically significant CMKLR1/L1.2 cell migration at concentrations of 5, 10, and 50 nM, although the response was not as robust as the unmodified form. ChemA155 also triggered CMKLR1+ cell migration, although it should be noted that this recombinant protein has a nonnative “PH” C-terminal dipeptide following the native terminal alanine (residue 155; Table I), which may alter its activity.

The predicted homology between chemerin and the antimicrobial cathelicidins, coupled with the expression of chemerin in the skin and other epithelial cell surfaces continually exposed to bacterial challenge (9), led us to evaluate possible antibacterial activities of chemerin. Different chemerin isoforms were first tested for antibacterial activity against a laboratory strain of E. coli. Human cathelicidin LL-37 (3 μM) was used as a positive control peptide inhibitor of bacterial growth (20). As demonstrated in Fig. 5A, full-length chemerin (prochemerin, 2 μM) significantly inhibited the growth of E. coli when incubated for 24 h, leading to survival of 59 ± 13% of bacteria compared with vehicle-treated E. coli set as 100%. Notably, truncated chemerin was an even more effective inhibitor of bacterial growth. The primary chemerin cleavage product generated by cat K and L (chemS157; Table I) was significantly more effective than prochemerin in inhibiting bacterial growth, resulting in 33 ± 15% E. coli survival (Fig. 5A). Truncated chemA155 also significantly reduced E. coli survival (39 ± 19%) versus prochemerin (Fig. 5A). We also tested chemerin (2 μM) for antibacterial activity against a clinical isolate of another genus within the family of Enterobacteriaceae, K. pneumoniae. As demonstrated in Fig. 5A, incubation of K. pneumoniae with prochemerin resulted in 58 ± 14% viable bacteria compared with control, whereas chemA155 and chemS157 reduced K. pneumoniae survival to 32 ± 11 and 46 ± 13%, respectively. Thus, similar to E. coli, the truncated form of chemerin was more effective at inhibiting K. pneumoniae growth than prochemerin. However, it should be noted that 24-h incubation of prochemerin with either E. coli or K. pneumoniae also resulted in some truncation of prochemerin (data not shown), suggesting that native protein requires removal of inhibitory C-terminal sequence to display full antibacterial activity. Taken together, these data suggest that proteolytic cleavage increases the antimicrobial activity of chemerin.

FIGURE 5.

Chemerin exhibits antibacterial activity. The antimicrobial activity of full-length (pro-chem), chemA155, chemS157 (HPLC-purified chem/SspB; Table I), Fc-chemS157, Fc-chemR125, and Fc alone were tested against E. coli (A–D) and K. pneumoniae (A) using the microtiter broth dilution assay. Chemerin isoforms were tested at 2 μM (A, B), 0.5 μM (D), or at the indicated concentrations (C). Synthetic LL-37 (3 μM) was used as a positive control (A). Bacteria were incubated with the peptides for 24 h (A, C, D) or for indicated times (B). The results are expressed as the mean ± SD of nine (A, E. coli), four (A, K. pneumoniae, B, C), or two (D) independent experiments done in duplicate. A, Statistically significant differences between prochemerin and the truncated chemerin isoforms are indicated by asterisks and p values (Student t test). B–D, Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences comparing the indicated protein preparations with vehicle- or Fc alone-treated E. coli. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001, Student t test.

FIGURE 5.

Chemerin exhibits antibacterial activity. The antimicrobial activity of full-length (pro-chem), chemA155, chemS157 (HPLC-purified chem/SspB; Table I), Fc-chemS157, Fc-chemR125, and Fc alone were tested against E. coli (A–D) and K. pneumoniae (A) using the microtiter broth dilution assay. Chemerin isoforms were tested at 2 μM (A, B), 0.5 μM (D), or at the indicated concentrations (C). Synthetic LL-37 (3 μM) was used as a positive control (A). Bacteria were incubated with the peptides for 24 h (A, C, D) or for indicated times (B). The results are expressed as the mean ± SD of nine (A, E. coli), four (A, K. pneumoniae, B, C), or two (D) independent experiments done in duplicate. A, Statistically significant differences between prochemerin and the truncated chemerin isoforms are indicated by asterisks and p values (Student t test). B–D, Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences comparing the indicated protein preparations with vehicle- or Fc alone-treated E. coli. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001, Student t test.

Close modal

The inhibition of E. coli growth by chemerin was detectable after just 8 h (Fig. 5B). Treatment with prochemerin, chemA155, or chemS157 diminished the survival of E. coli to 65 ± 7, 53 ± 10, and 60 ± 5% of control, respectively (Fig. 5B). The chemerin-mediated decrease in bacterial viability grew even more pronounced at prolonged incubation times; after 24 h, for example, the percentage of viable bacteria decreased to 53 ± 9, 35 ± 9, and 35 ± 4%, respectively (Fig. 5B). With the exception of 4 h, when prochemerin seemed to be more effective compared with chemA155 and chemS157 (87 ± 5, 95 ± 3, 94 ± 4), the truncated chemerin forms demonstrated stronger antibacterial activity against E. coli (Fig. 5B). Interestingly, chemerin-mediated inhibition of E. coli survival was detectable over a relatively wide range of concentrations, from 2 μM (the highest concentration tested leading to statistically significant growth inhibition) to as little as 0.125 to 0.0625 μM for chemA155 and chemS157 (Fig. 5C). This was in contrast with LL-37, which was highly effective at inhibiting E. coli growth when used at 3 μM (Fig. 5A) but had almost no effect when tested at 1.5 μM (data not shown). The enhanced antibacterial activity of the truncated chemerin isoforms compared with prochemerin suggests an inhibitory role for the prochemerin C-terminal peptide. Addition of chemically synthesized C-terminal peptide KALPRS that is released from prochemerin by SspB, cat K, and cat L, however, did not reduce the antibacterial activity of the larger truncated chemerin forms (data not shown). These data suggest that after release from the core protein, the C-terminal peptide no longer plays an inhibitory role. Interestingly, both chemerin Fc fusion proteins, Fc-chemS157 and Fc-chemR125, displayed comparable antibacterial activity against E. coli (Fig. 5D). These data suggest that in contrast with chemotactic activity, the antibacterial properties of chemerin appear to be localized closer to the N terminus, because removal of 38 residues from the C terminus did not abrogate its antibacterial activity.

In this article, we identify a novel antimicrobial activity associated with chemerin, and show that host-derived cat L and K can cleave and activate the leukocyte attractant activity of chemerin, as well as enhance its antibacterial effects.

Various serine proteases have been reported to effectively convert chemerin to a potent chemoattractant in vitro. There is also a single example of a cysteine protease, S. aureus-derived SspB that can efficiently activate human chemerin. In addition, host-originating cathepsin S and calpains have been reported to process mouse chemerin, although in this case, the proteolysis of the C terminus generates chemerin variants equipped primarily with anti-inflammatory properties (13, 23). Cysteine cathepsins of the papain-like family are normally confined to the endosomal/lysosomal network. However, there is evidence that certain cathepsins are also active extracellularly, either in association with the cell surface or in soluble form (14). Some cells such as macrophages and fibroblasts constitutively secrete cysteine cathepsins as zymogens (14). Moreover, macrophages have been reported to deploy enzymatically active cat B, L, and S, and exhibit an elastin-degrading phenotype, indicating that macrophages can mobilize cysteine cathepsins to participate in the pathophysiologic remodeling of the extracellular matrix (17). Massive amounts of extracellular cathepsins, probably released from macrophages, are found in the bronchial tree of patients suffering from acute pulmonary inflammation (24). In addition, cat K is strongly implicated in maintaining the homeostasis of the extracellular matrix in the lung (25). Because chemerin mRNA is abundantly produced in lung (1, 2), collectively, these data suggest that either cat L or K may be involved in chemerin processing in this organ. Alternatively, significant expression and/or activity of cat K and L in the joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and skin dermatoses, respectively (26, 27), together with reported chemerin immunoreactivity or bioactivity, or both, in psoriasis skin and inflamed synovial fluid (1, 9, 28), suggest that these cathepsins may play a role in chemerin cleavage in joints and skin. Because cathepsin-mediated processing releases chemerin attractant activity, these enzymes may have an important regulatory role in immune cell migration. Notably, the presence of pDC in lung, as well as the inflamed joints and psoriatic skin (1, 9, 28, 29), supports the notion that cat K and L, through the generation of active chemerin, may contribute to pDC recruitment to these sites.

Our data also uncover a novel role for chemerin as a host-expressed antibacterial agent in host defense. Despite low primary sequence homology between chemerin and antibacterial cathelicidins, the conserved positioning of key cysteine residues leads to a predicted shared similar tertiary structure, although recent NMR assignment of human chemerin does not exclude a different fold (30). LL-37, the 37-aa C-terminal derivative of human cathelicidin hCAP18, is well known for its potent and broad-spectrum bacterial killing activity. However, chemerin is structurally similar to the cathelin-like N-terminal region. Interestingly, the cathelin-like domain of hCAP18 has been reported to possess antimicrobial activity, although the mechanism by which it inhibits bacterial growth is not known (20).

Chemerin may exert antimicrobial activity on the surface of skin and/or lung where it is locally expressed (1, 9). For example, the respiratory surface is continually exposed to pathogenic organisms, such as K. pneumoniae, which, as shown in this report, might be a direct chemerin target. Although either prochemerin or the C-terminal truncated chemerin forms displayed antibacterial activity, C-terminal processing augmented the inhibitory effect of chemerin on the growth of Enterobacteriaceae. However, our data suggest that prochemerin is also processed by bacterial proteases during incubation, although the protease(s) responsible remain to be identified. It will be interesting to map the specific chemerin domains/regions responsible for its antimicrobial activity. Our preliminary data suggest that most of the antibacterial activity is associated with the chemerin region(s) located within 65–115 aa (data not shown). This is consistent with our data showing that Fc-chemS157 and Fc-chemR125 have similar antibacterial activity, although the inhibitory C-terminal peptide must be removed for full antibacterial effects.

Although the antimicrobial effects of chemerin on E. coli and K. pneumoniae were less potent compared with the classical antibacterial peptide LL-37, chemerin showed bactericidal properties at much lower concentrations. In general, pore-forming antimicrobial peptides, such as LL-37, require micromolar concentrations for activity. However, some antibacterial peptides, such as Lactococcus-derived nisin, operate in the nanomolar range (31). This ability is attributed to docking to a specific component on the bacteria cell wall for subsequent pore formation, or to the dual-killing mechanisms of the peptide, which in addition inhibits bacterial cell wall biosynthesis (32). Chemerin might use a similar strategy to exert its antimicrobial activity in the nanomolar range. However, because antimicrobial properties can be sensitive to pH and ionic composition of the peptide environment (31), it will be important to determine whether chemerin operates in conditions similar to those found in the skin, bronchial tree, or both.

Thus, our work uncovers a novel antibacterial property of chemerin and characterizes the activation of chemerin by host-derived cysteine proteases of the cathepsin family, and adds a new dimension to the ways chemerin may modulate and augment immunity.

We are grateful to Dr. M. Bulanda and K. Palaga for help with bacteria collection.

This work was supported by the Ministry of Scientific Research, Poland (Grants SPUB3088 and 0724/B/P01/2011/40 to J.C.), a Fogarty International Research Collaborative award (R03TW007174-01 to E.C.B. and J.C.), a grant from the European Union 6th FP project (SP6MTKD-CT-2006-042586 to J.C.), a Team award from the Foundation for Polish Science (TEAM/2010-5/1 to J.C.), and the National Institutes of Health (Grant AI079320 to B.A.Z. and National Institutes of Health grants to E.C.B.). T.H. is supported by National Institutes of Health Grant R01-AI37113. J.P. is supported by the European Community Gums & Joints project (7FP-HEALTH-2010-261460), the Ministry of Scientific Research, Poland (Warsaw, Poland; Grant 1642/B/P01/2008/35), and the Foundation for Polish Science (TEAM Project DPS/424-329/10). The Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology of Jagiellonian University is a beneficiary of structural funds from the European Union (Grant POIG.02.01.00-12-064/08).

Abbreviations used in this article:

cat

cathepsin

chem

chemerin truncated at indicated residue position

chemS

chemerin serum form

chem/SspB

staphopain B-truncated chemerin

CID

collision-induced dissociation

CMKLR1

chemokine-like receptor 1

hCAP18

human cationic antimicrobial peptide of 18 kDa

MHB

Mueller–Hinton broth

MS

matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry

pDC

plasmacytoid dendritic cell

SspB

staphopain B.

1
Wittamer
V.
,
Franssen
J. D.
,
Vulcano
M.
,
Mirjolet
J. F.
,
Le Poul
E.
,
Migeotte
I.
,
Brézillon
S.
,
Tyldesley
R.
,
Blanpain
C.
,
Detheux
M.
, et al
.
2003
.
Specific recruitment of antigen-presenting cells by chemerin, a novel processed ligand from human inflammatory fluids.
J. Exp. Med.
198
:
977
985
.
2
Zabel
B. A.
,
Silverio
A. M.
,
Butcher
E. C.
.
2005
.
Chemokine-like receptor 1 expression and chemerin-directed chemotaxis distinguish plasmacytoid from myeloid dendritic cells in human blood.
J. Immunol.
174
:
244
251
.
3
Barnea
G.
,
Strapps
W.
,
Herrada
G.
,
Berman
Y.
,
Ong
J.
,
Kloss
B.
,
Axel
R.
,
Lee
K. J.
.
2008
.
The genetic design of signaling cascades to record receptor activation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
105
:
64
69
.
4
Zabel
B. A.
,
Nakae
S.
,
Zúñiga
L.
,
Kim
J. Y.
,
Ohyama
T.
,
Alt
C.
,
Pan
J.
,
Suto
H.
,
Soler
D.
,
Allen
S. J.
, et al
.
2008
.
Mast cell-expressed orphan receptor CCRL2 binds chemerin and is required for optimal induction of IgE-mediated passive cutaneous anaphylaxis.
J. Exp. Med.
205
:
2207
2220
.
5
Zabel
B. A.
,
Zuniga
L.
,
Ohyama
T.
,
Allen
S. J.
,
Cichy
J.
,
Handel
T. M.
,
Butcher
E. C.
.
2006
.
Chemoattractants, extracellular proteases, and the integrated host defense response.
Exp. Hematol.
34
:
1021
1032
.
6
Wittamer
V.
,
Bondue
B.
,
Guillabert
A.
,
Vassart
G.
,
Parmentier
M.
,
Communi
D.
.
2005
.
Neutrophil-mediated maturation of chemerin: a link between innate and adaptive immunity.
J. Immunol.
175
:
487
493
.
7
Zabel
B. A.
,
Allen
S. J.
,
Kulig
P.
,
Allen
J. A.
,
Cichy
J.
,
Handel
T. M.
,
Butcher
E. C.
.
2005
.
Chemerin activation by serine proteases of the coagulation, fibrinolytic, and inflammatory cascades.
J. Biol. Chem.
280
:
34661
34666
.
8
Du
X. Y.
,
Zabel
B. A.
,
Myles
T.
,
Allen
S. J.
,
Handel
T. M.
,
Lee
P. P.
,
Butcher
E. C.
,
Leung
L. L.
.
2009
.
Regulation of chemerin bioactivity by plasma carboxypeptidase N, carboxypeptidase B (activated thrombin-activable fibrinolysis inhibitor), and platelets.
J. Biol. Chem.
284
:
751
758
.
9
Albanesi
C.
,
Scarponi
C.
,
Pallotta
S.
,
Daniele
R.
,
Bosisio
D.
,
Madonna
S.
,
Fortugno
P.
,
Gonzalvo-Feo
S.
,
Franssen
J. D.
,
Parmentier
M.
, et al
.
2009
.
Chemerin expression marks early psoriatic skin lesions and correlates with plasmacytoid dendritic cell recruitment.
J. Exp. Med.
206
:
249
258
.
10
Parolini
S.
,
Santoro
A.
,
Marcenaro
E.
,
Luini
W.
,
Massardi
L.
,
Facchetti
F.
,
Communi
D.
,
Parmentier
M.
,
Majorana
A.
,
Sironi
M.
, et al
.
2007
.
The role of chemerin in the colocalization of NK and dendritic cell subsets into inflamed tissues.
Blood
109
:
3625
3632
.
11
Skrzeczyńska-Moncznik
J.
,
Stefańska
A.
,
Zabel
B. A.
,
Kapińska-Mrowiecka
M.
,
Butcher
E. C.
,
Cichy
J.
.
2009
.
Chemerin and the recruitment of NK cells to diseased skin.
Acta Biochim. Pol.
56
:
355
360
.
12
Skrzeczyńska-Moncznik
J.
,
Wawro
K.
,
Stefańska
A.
,
Oleszycka
E.
,
Kulig
P.
,
Zabel
B. A.
,
Sułkowski
M.
,
Kapińska-Mrowiecka
M.
,
Czubak-Macugowska
M.
,
Butcher
E. C.
,
Cichy
J.
.
2009
.
Potential role of chemerin in recruitment of plasmacytoid dendritic cells to diseased skin.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
380
:
323
327
.
13
Kulig
P.
,
Zabel
B. A.
,
Dubin
G.
,
Allen
S. J.
,
Ohyama
T.
,
Potempa
J.
,
Handel
T. M.
,
Butcher
E. C.
,
Cichy
J.
.
2007
.
Staphylococcus aureus-derived staphopain B, a potent cysteine protease activator of plasma chemerin.
J. Immunol.
178
:
3713
3720
.
14
Brix
K.
,
Dunkhorst
A.
,
Mayer
K.
,
Jordans
S.
.
2008
.
Cysteine cathepsins: cellular roadmap to different functions.
Biochimie
90
:
194
207
.
15
Mohamed
M. M.
,
Sloane
B. F.
.
2006
.
Cysteine cathepsins: multifunctional enzymes in cancer.
Nat. Rev. Cancer
6
:
764
775
.
16
Funicello
M.
,
Novelli
M.
,
Ragni
M.
,
Vottari
T.
,
Cocuzza
C.
,
Soriano-Lopez
J.
,
Chiellini
C.
,
Boschi
F.
,
Marzola
P.
,
Masiello
P.
, et al
.
2007
.
Cathepsin K null mice show reduced adiposity during the rapid accumulation of fat stores.
PLoS ONE
2
:
e683
.
17
Reddy
V. Y.
,
Zhang
Q. Y.
,
Weiss
S. J.
.
1995
.
Pericellular mobilization of the tissue-destructive cysteine proteinases, cathepsins B, L, and S, by human monocyte-derived macrophages.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92
:
3849
3853
.
18
Yang
M.
,
Zhang
Y.
,
Pan
J.
,
Sun
J.
,
Liu
J.
,
Libby
P.
,
Sukhova
G. K.
,
Doria
A.
,
Katunuma
N.
,
Peroni
O. D.
, et al
.
2007
.
Cathepsin L activity controls adipogenesis and glucose tolerance.
Nat. Cell Biol.
9
:
970
977
.
19
Sørensen
O. E.
,
Follin
P.
,
Johnsen
A. H.
,
Calafat
J.
,
Tjabringa
G. S.
,
Hiemstra
P. S.
,
Borregaard
N.
.
2001
.
Human cathelicidin, hCAP-18, is processed to the antimicrobial peptide LL-37 by extracellular cleavage with proteinase 3.
Blood
97
:
3951
3959
.
20
Zaiou
M.
,
Nizet
V.
,
Gallo
R. L.
.
2003
.
Antimicrobial and protease inhibitory functions of the human cathelicidin (hCAP18/LL-37) prosequence.
J. Invest. Dermatol.
120
:
810
816
.
21
Zabel
B. A.
,
Ohyama
T.
,
Zuniga
L.
,
Kim
J. Y.
,
Johnston
B.
,
Allen
S. J.
,
Guido
D. G.
,
Handel
T. M.
,
Butcher
E. C.
.
2006
.
Chemokine-like receptor 1 expression by macrophages in vivo: regulation by TGF-beta and TLR ligands.
Exp. Hematol.
34
:
1106
1114
.
22
Radetsky
M.
,
Wheeler
R. C.
,
Roe
M. H.
,
Todd
J. K.
.
1986
.
Microtiter broth dilution method for yeast susceptibility testing with validation by clinical outcome.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
24
:
600
606
.
23
Cash
J. L.
,
Hart
R.
,
Russ
A.
,
Dixon
J. P.
,
Colledge
W. H.
,
Doran
J.
,
Hendrick
A. G.
,
Carlton
M. B.
,
Greaves
D. R.
.
2008
.
Synthetic chemerin-derived peptides suppress inflammation through ChemR23.
J. Exp. Med.
205
:
767
775
.
24
Serveau-Avesque
C.
,
Martino
M. F.
,
Hervé-Grépinet
V.
,
Hazouard
E.
,
Gauthier
F.
,
Diot
E.
,
Lalmanach
G.
.
2006
.
Active cathepsins B, H, K, L and S in human inflammatory bronchoalveolar lavage fluids.
Biol. Cell
98
:
15
22
.
25
Bühling
F.
,
Röcken
C.
,
Brasch
F.
,
Hartig
R.
,
Yasuda
Y.
,
Saftig
P.
,
Brömme
D.
,
Welte
T.
.
2004
.
Pivotal role of cathepsin K in lung fibrosis.
Am. J. Pathol.
164
:
2203
2216
.
26
Bylaite
M.
,
Moussali
H.
,
Marciukaitiene
I.
,
Ruzicka
T.
,
Walz
M.
.
2006
.
Expression of cathepsin L and its inhibitor hurpin in inflammatory and neoplastic skin diseases.
Exp. Dermatol.
15
:
110
118
.
27
Hou
W. S.
,
Li
Z.
,
Gordon
R. E.
,
Chan
K.
,
Klein
M. J.
,
Levy
R.
,
Keysser
M.
,
Keyszer
G.
,
Brömme
D.
.
2001
.
Cathepsin k is a critical protease in synovial fibroblast-mediated collagen degradation.
Am. J. Pathol.
159
:
2167
2177
.
28
Skrzeczyńska-Moncznik
J.
,
Wawro
K.
,
Stefańska
A.
,
Oleszycka
E.
,
Kulig
P.
,
Zabel
B. A.
,
Sulkowski
M.
,
Kapińska-Mrowiecka
M.
,
Czubak-Macugowska
M.
,
Butcher
E. C.
,
Cichy
J.
.
2009
.
Potential role of chemerin in recruitment of plasmacytoid dendritic cells to diseased skin.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
380
:
323
327
.
29
de Heer
H. J.
,
Hammad
H.
,
Soullié
T.
,
Hijdra
D.
,
Vos
N.
,
Willart
M. A.
,
Hoogsteden
H. C.
,
Lambrecht
B. N.
.
2004
.
Essential role of lung plasmacytoid dendritic cells in preventing asthmatic reactions to harmless inhaled antigen.
J. Exp. Med.
200
:
89
98
.
30
Allen
S. J.
,
Zabel
B. A.
,
Kirkpatrick
J.
,
Butcher
E. C.
,
Nietlispach
D.
,
Handel
T. M.
.
2007
.
NMR assignment of human chemerin, a novel chemoattractant.
Biomol. NMR Assign.
1
:
171
173
.
31
Zasloff
M.
2002
.
Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms.
Nature
415
:
389
395
.
32
Wiedemann
I.
,
Breukink
E.
,
van Kraaij
C.
,
Kuipers
O. P.
,
Bierbaum
G.
,
de Kruijff
B.
,
Sahl
H. G.
.
2001
.
Specific binding of nisin to the peptidoglycan precursor lipid II combines pore formation and inhibition of cell wall biosynthesis for potent antibiotic activity.
J. Biol. Chem.
276
:
1772
1779
.

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.