Systemic lupus erythematosus is considered a prototype of systemic autoimmune diseases; however, despite considerable advances in recent years in the understanding of basic mechanisms in immunology, little progress has been made in elucidating the etiology and pathogenesis of this disease. This even holds for inbred mice, such as the lupus-prone New Zealand Black/New Zealand White F1 mice, which are all genetically programmed to develop lupus at a predetermined age. This frustrating state of affairs calls for a fundamental change in our scientific thinking and the opening of new directions in lupus research. In this study, we suggest that intrinsic B cell tolerance mechanisms are not grossly impaired in lupus-prone mice, but that an unusually strong positive selection event recruits a small number of autoreactive B cells to the germinal centers. This event could be facilitated by nucleic acid–protein complexes that are created by somatic changes in the susceptible animal.
A substantial amount of experimental work has been done in recent years, in both human subjects and mouse models, centering on B cell tolerance mechanisms and their apparent failure in autoimmune disease. One major conclusion from these research efforts has been the notion that B cell tolerance is not confined to immature B cells (central tolerance) as originally postulated by Burnet (1), but that a large number of autoreactive B cells reach the blood and the secondary immunological organs. These cells are said to be subject to a series of tolerogenic checkpoints at various stages of their maturation and activation (peripheral tolerance). The tolerance checkpoints, combined with T cell tolerance, protect the organism against autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). For example, Goodnow et al. (2) have counted as many as 10 checkpoints for B cell tolerance, from the immature B cell to the plasma cell stage, and a similar number of checkpoints for T cell tolerance. The mechanisms responsible for the elimination of autoreactive B cells at each of these checkpoints remain largely unknown.
Among the large number of mouse strains that serve as models for SLE, some develop lupus spontaneously at a well-defined age [e.g., New Zealand Black (NZB)/New Zealand White (NZW) F1, MRL/lpr/lpr, BXSB.Yaa (3)]; others can be induced to develop the disease by knocking out specific genes (e.g., CD22, Lyn, FcγRIIb) or by introducing genes (e.g., BAFF, Bcl2) that are involved in B cell regulation and/or activation. Among the spontaneous mouse models, the oldest NZB/NZW F1 (abbreviated B/W) mouse, discovered >50 y ago, has disease properties that are most similar to those of human SLE (4). This mouse is characterized by a strong female-to-male bias, fatal immune-mediated glomerulonephritis, and high titers of anti-nuclear autoantibodies, including high-affinity IgG Abs to dsDNA. The disease in B/W mice is apparently not dominated by a single gene product, such as Fas (as in MRL/lpr/lpr mice) or TLR7 (as in BXSB.Yaa mice), but is controlled by multiple genetic elements (4), as is the case in human lupus.
Each SLE mouse model has different characteristics; however, in this review we discuss mostly, but not exclusively, the spontaneous B/W model. We describe an experimental system in which a prerearranged H chain derived from a high-affinity IgG anti-DNA hybridoma (D42) of B/W origin (5, 6) was site directed to the mouse germline of the C57BL/6 mouse and subsequently backcrossed onto the genetic background of the original autoimmune strain (7, 8). This work has implications for several controversial issues in autoimmunity and has culminated in the recent analysis of single B cells from distinct bone marrow and peripheral populations, illuminating the fate of high-affinity autoreactive B cells in health and disease.
The D42 H chain is encoded by the VH11 gene of the small S107 VH family of the mouse (5, 6). The gene products of VH11 (S107) represent at least 5% of the H chains expressed in anti-DNA Abs of B/W mice (9, 10). The CDR3 of the D42 H chain is rich in arginine residues that are encoded by the D segment Sp2, read in an unusual reading frame, as well as by flanking N sequences (6). These arginine residues in CDR3 are important for DNA binding (11–14). The D42 H chain has two somatic mutations—one in CDR1 and one in CDR2—that increase the affinity for DNA by ∼10-fold (11). The acquisition of mutations that increase the affinity for DNA is consistent with T cell dependence and selection by the autoantigen. However, the D42 Ab presumably binds dsDNA even in its H and L chain-unmutated (germline) forms (8), although it has been argued that due to the presence of nontemplated (N-region) junctional sequences in CDR3, an unmutated configuration of a H chain cannot be determined with absolute certainty (15). However, other mouse anti-DNA Abs, such as those encoded by the highly DNA-specific BW-16 VH gene, also bind DNA with apparently unmutated H and L chain configurations (13, 14). These include Abs that do not contain arginine or other presumed DNA-binding amino acid residues (e.g., lysine, asparagine) in their H chain CDR3, so that any putative somatic mutation in their N regions is not likely to affect their DNA-binding affinity. The specificity of the D42 Ab is strictly limited to ssDNA and dsDNA. We have not observed even a low level of cross-reaction with closely related Ags, such as RNA and cardiolipin (5). This high specificity for DNA may result from the strong preference for polynucleotides containing deoxythymidine sequences (5).
The high affinity of the D42 Ab for dsDNA, the increase in affinity for the cognate Ag by each of the two H chain somatic mutations, and the strict DNA specificity with its poly(dT) fine specificity support the view that the autoimmune response to DNA mimics a secondary immunization with a foreign Ag (9, 12, 13). It was recently proposed that anti-DNA autoantibodies arise by somatic mutations, generated in the course of a B cell response to a foreign Ag (15, 16). Whereas this mechanism has been demonstrated in several cases, it may not apply to high-affinity anti-DNA Abs. It is also not supported by the elegant in vivo experiment of Scharff and coworkers (10) in B/W mice. These investigators followed up on their widely cited initial observation (17) that the S107 myeloma protein encoded by the V1 (T15) VH gene of the S107 family had changed its specificity in vitro from phosphorylcholine to DNA by a mutation leading to a single amino acid change. They further immunized prediseased B/W mice with phosphorylcholine–keyhole limpet hemocyanin to encourage them to produce anti-DNA autoantibodies by introducing somatic mutations in the widely expressed V1 gene. Surprisingly, however, the diseased lupus-prone mice used, exclusively, the closely related V11(S107) VH gene and not the readily available V1 gene for generating their anti-DNA autoantibodies (10). This experiment shows that, at least in this case, anti-DNA autoantibodies are not generated by simply mutating binding sites of Abs to foreign Ags, even when these Ags are structurally related to the autoantigen and the elicited Abs are encoded by highly related germline genes.
In our initial experiments, the site-directed D42 H chain was expressed in its unmutated or mutated form in C57BL/6 mice. The majority of B cells in blood and spleen of these mice expressed the targeted H chain, but we measured no significant anti-DNA activity in the serum, suggesting very efficient B cell tolerance mechanisms in the normal animals (7). When backcrossed onto the B/W genetic background, transgenic IgM anti-DNA Abs appeared in the serum of 3-mo-old female mice, whereas high titers of both IgM and IgG anti-DNA were measured in 7-mo-old mice, concomitant with the development of clinical disease. The age-dependent switch from IgM to IgG anti-DNA at the onset of clinical disease in B/W mice was observed >30 y ago by Talal and coworkers (18) and is consistent with the view that IgG autoantibodies, mostly of the IgG2a and IgG2b subclasses, are essential components in the pathogenesis of clinical nephritis in murine lupus.
The difference in DNA-binding activity between the C57BL/6 and B/W D42H transgenic mice was reflected by the L chains that could associate with the targeted D42H (8). Although many different L chains associated with the D42H in hybridomas of spontaneous, presumably activated C57BL/6 spleen cells and gave rise to low affinity for DNA, the great majority (85%) of D42H hybridomas from diseased, female B/W mice were associated with a single L chain, VκRF-Jκ5. This Vκ gene segment represents a one-gene Vκ family and encodes the same L chain as the original D42 hybridoma. This exceptionally strong selection for one particular H×L pairing that confers DNA binding with high affinity and specificity was present in every single diseased D42H B/W mouse analyzed. In contrast, not a single VκRF-expressing hybridoma was ever identified in D42H transgenic C57BL/6 mice.
Because we were interested in B cell tolerance mechanisms, namely, clonal deletion (1), clonal anergy (19), and receptor editing (20), and their apparent failure in autoimmune mice, we further generated several H×L double–knock-in mice on normal and B/W genetic backgrounds (21, 22). These included the D42H transgene, combined with Vκ1-Jκ1, Vκ4-Jκ4, or Vκ8-Jκ5. The L chain-targeted BALB/c mice were constructed in the laboratory of Martin Weigert and had a variable number of Jκ segments available for secondary rearrangements. The DNA affinities of the three double-transgenic constructs were very similar and were ∼1.5 orders of magnitude lower than that of the canonical D42H/VκRF-Jκ5 H×L pair. On a normal mouse background, (C57BL/6 × BALB/c)F1, we found that the double-transgenic mice edited their L chains extensively and that the extent of receptor editing depended greatly on the availability of the unrearranged Jκ segments on the targeted L chain allele. Thus, D42H/Vκ1-Jκ1 B cells, having three remaining unrearranged Jκ segments, edited their L chain in almost every recovered hybridoma of LPS-activated spleen cells; D42H/Vκ4-Jκ4 B cells with only one remaining Jκ were only partially edited; and D42H/Vκ8-Jκ5 B cells remained essentially unedited (21). Surprisingly, when backcrossed to the B/W autoimmune background, the double-transgenic mice edited their L chains to the same extent as the normal mice (22). This suggested that the mechanism of BCR editing is intact in diseased female B/W mice. In this study, the anti-DNA transgenic B/W mice differed somewhat from anti-MHC class I transgenic MRL/lpr/lpr mice. In these mice, Feeney and coworkers (23) noted a decrease in the extent of receptor editing, although the mice were as efficient as normal mice in deletion of the transgenic, autoreactive B cells (24).
Strikingly, ∼25% of D42H/Vκ1-Jκ1 hybridomas of spontaneously (non-LPS)–activated cells from the transgenic B/W mice did not use non-DNA–binding editor L chains, but rather the very high-affinity anti-DNA canonical VκRF-Jκ5 L chain (22). In contrast, no hybridoma from the nonautoimmune transgenic C57BL/6 × BALB/c mice had the VκRF-Jκ5 L chain. The fraction of VκRF-edited hybridomas was again dependent on the available Jκ segments. Despite a similar initial affinity of Vκ1, Vκ4, and Vκ8 L chains combined with the D42 H chain, the DNA-binding capacity in the serum of D42H/Vκ1-Jκ1 B/W female mice was several orders of magnitude higher than that of D42H/Vκ8-Jκ5 mice (22). Apparently, receptor editing in diseased B/W mice is not only fully functional, but it also operates to make the autoimmune disease worse by combining random editing with a powerful positive selection of the highest-affinity autoreactive B cells. Weigert and coworkers (25) reported very similar results in MRL/lpr/lpr knock-in mice, targeted with the high-affinity anti-DNA H chain 3H9 H76R.
The low-affinity anti-DNA D42H/Vκ8-Jκ5 B cells that could not edit their L chains were found to be anergic and populated the spleens of normal and B/W mice in large numbers. We looked at several parameters of anergy, such as BCR density, tyrosine phosphorylation of BCR-dependent signaling components, activation by LPS or CpG, calcium immobilization, and Ig secretion in B cells taken ex vivo from the spleens of D42H/Vκ8-Jκ5 H×L mice. We found that the B/W transgenic B cells were as anergic as the corresponding D42H/Vκ8 B cells that were derived from normal mice (26). This suggests that clonal anergy, like receptor editing, is virtually intact in the lupus-prone mice.
With the hybridoma work having clarified the final outcome of B cell tolerance and the disease process in the autoimmune mice, we still did not know the fate of the high-affinity anti-DNA autoreactive B cells through the various stages of B cell maturation in the bone marrow and the periphery. This was done by Davidson and coworkers (27), who performed single-cell analysis and quantitative PCR (qPCR) expression studies of the relevant anti-DNA H and L chains in young and old B/W mice, targeted with the unmutated D42 H chain. Young B/W mice serve as a particularly good control for diseased, old mice, because they have the same genetic background but do not show any features of clinical disease. B cells from young B/W mice, however, are hyperactive, possibly as a result of unexplained polyclonal activation (28). This could give rise to the relatively early anti-DNA–binding activity in the serum, which could be mediated by polyreactive IgM Abs. This early anti-DNA–binding activity is found prior to the IgG switch in activity, which occurs at ∼5 mo of age (18).
Huang et al. (27) analyzed the L chain repertoire of unmutated D42H B cells from T1, T2, marginal zone, follicular, and germinal center (GC) populations in 8-wk-old and 32-wk-old female B/W mice. Several L chains were associated with the D42 H chain in the various peripheral B cell compartments. One dominant L chain, 55.01, constituted a large fraction of the repertoire in all the compartments except the GC. This H×L combination did not differ in abundance between young (healthy) and diseased mice. The same H×L combination had been previously identified in a large number of edited D42H B/W hybridomas (22). The Ab product of these hybridomas is a polyreactive IgM that binds DNA with very low affinity, as well as phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylserine, and actin. Such polyreactive IgM autoantibodies were recently shown to protect MRL/lpr/lpr mice from lupus nephritis and to improve their survival (29). Strikingly, the VκRF-Jκ5 L chain, which is the only mouse L chain that confers anti-DNA binding upon the D42 H chain with high affinity and specificity, was detected only in cells derived from one B cell compartment, the GC, and exclusively in old mice; no D42H/VκRF H×L combination could be found in 8-wk-old B/W mice in any of the peripheral B cell compartments, including the GC. This suggests that the high-affinity anti-DNA B cells are perfectly regulated in young B/W mice (as well as in normal mice) and throughout B cell maturation in diseased B/W mice up to the GC stage. This analysis may also suggest that the anti-DNA B cells that secrete polyreactive IgM anti-DNA Abs and are common in young and old B/W mice may constitute only a minor component of the precursor B cells that are recruited to the GC.
Perhaps even more revealing is the qPCR analysis of the same study (27), in which different B cell populations from bone marrow and spleen were examined specifically for the expression ratio of VκRF to D42H. A high ratio of ∼1 was observed in immature B cells in the bone marrow. This is somewhat surprising, as there is no good reason for the preferential selection of high-affinity anti-DNA B cells at this developmental stage. One explanation could be a preferential association of these H and L chains over other H×L combinations. Another possibility is the requirement for binding to negative charges on bone marrow stromal cells that induces preferential B cell proliferation. Such binding to stromal cells has been shown for the positively charged non-Ig portion of λ5 in the pre-BCR (30). In any event, the expression ratio of VκRF to D42H fell by 20- to 50-fold in peripheral B cell populations of both young and old mice, suggesting that the high-affinity autoreactive B cells in the bone marrow are mostly (but not completely) eliminated by central tolerance, mediated by receptor editing and/or by clonal deletion.
In young B/W mice, residual autoreactive B cells apparently never make it to the GC and plasma cell compartments, possibly due to a lack of T cell help. Alternatively, these cells may be eliminated in the GC by a Fas-dependent tolerance mechanism that operates for a membrane-bound self-Ag and is defective in Fas-deficient MRL/lpr mice (31). Strikingly, however, in the diseased B/W mice, a much higher expression ratio of VκRF to D42H reappears in the GC. This inevitably leads to the emergence of the high-affinity, class-switched, and somatically mutated D42H/VκRF IgG anti-DNA plasma cells in the spleen and bone marrow. It follows that only two tolerance checkpoints are apparent in this experimental system, as follows: central tolerance and GC tolerance. The difference between young and old B/W mice lies in the remarkable activation and positive selection of residual autoreactive B cells from the follicular compartment into the GC. Similar results were obtained with human tonsil autoreactive B cells that were recruited to the GC of SLE patients, but not to the GC of rheumatoid arthritis patients or healthy control subjects (32). Although it has been suggested that L chain secondary rearrangements could also take place in the periphery (25), it is unlikely that the VκRF in the GC is reintroduced by L chain receptor editing, because no RAG mRNA was detected by qPCR in the follicular and GC compartments (27); rather, receptor editing in the bone marrow probably adds to the small number of high-affinity autoreactive B cells that escape central tolerance in the diseased B/W mice.
Lupus in B/W mice does not correspond to human SLE in every respect, but it is interesting to note the results of Nussenzweig and coworkers (33), who analyzed and expressed single B cell Abs from human SLE patients and healthy control subjects. They found that Abs from new emigrant B cells in the blood of SLE patients were not significantly different in anti-nuclear Ab (ANA) reactivity from the Abs of healthy donors, whereas the Abs from mature naive SLE B cells were different from those in controls (40 versus 20% ANA); however, these populations had high frequencies of polyreactive Abs with binding to DNA, LPS, and insulin. As we have suggested, these presumably (rarely measured) low-affinity and polyreactive IgM-producing B cells may not be precursors of the high-affinity, class-switched memory and plasma cells in these patients. In fact, Nussenzweig and coworkers (34) found that the increased number of self-reactive naive B cells in SLE does not have a strong impact on the general level of autoreactivity in the IgG+ memory B cell pool. They concluded that defects leading to abnormalities in IgG+ memory B cell tolerance in human SLE may be independent of the earlier defects in B cell tolerance.
It could be argued that tolerance is abrogated due to a B cell defect within the GC of lupus-prone mice, as is the case in Fas-deficient animals (31); however, unlike earlier B cell maturation stages, recruitment to the GC depends on the availability of Ag and T cell help. We prefer to assume that the residual anti-DNA follicular B cells that escape central tolerance are either ignorant (35) or subject to clonal anergy, which is readily reversible upon provision of T cell help. This was clearly demonstrated by Erikson and coworkers (36) in anti-DNA transgenic BALB/c and MRL/lpr/lpr mice. The autoreactive B cells are totally dependent on signals from helper and follicular helper CD4+ T cells for their recruitment into GC and their survival in the GC, respectively (37). Thus, follicular exclusion of autoreactive B cells in mice (38) and humans (32) could also be explained by the lack of T cell help (2). The mechanisms of T cell tolerance and activation in murine and human lupus have been investigated to a much lesser extent than B cell mechanisms. Nevertheless, T cells play a decisive role in the disease process (39). For example, one of the NZW contributing loci on chromosome 7, Sle3, disregulates CD4+ T cells (40). High-affinity anti-DNA Abs are class-switched and somatically mutated and thus also suggest a T cell-dependent secondary immune response (9, 13). Lupus in B/W mice was reversed by treatment with anti-T cell mAb, indicating a T cell help requirement for disease development (41). In human SLE, T cells provide excessive help to B cells. Engagement of the TCR CD3 leads to an enhanced signaling response, manifested by increased calcium flux and tyrosine phosphorylation (42). Patients with SLE contain abnormally high levels of the proinflammatory cytokine IL-17 in their serum. IL-17 increases the survival of B cells and contributes to the formation of GC and the production of Ab-secreting cells (43).
In the absence of any major B cell defect, there could be abnormal T cell help. But this possibility does not answer the question of why the positive Ag selection discussed in this work would occur only in old, but not young mice. We consider this question a crucial one in the etiology of spontaneous autoimmune disease. Another crucial question is: What is the initiating Ag? Most lupus researchers would agree that it is DNA, alone or in complex with nuclear proteins. In line with this, mice defective in the clearance of apoptotic cells develop a lupus-like disease (44), and a subgroup of SLE patients do not clear apoptotic cells properly (45) (reviewed in Ref. 46 together with defects in complement-dependent clearance of necrotic cells). But where does the antigenic DNA suddenly come from in B/W mice, and, if it has been there all along, why does it suddenly lead to a GC reaction? We suggest that, in B/W mice, endogenous recombinant murine leukemia virus (MLV) plays a decisive role in the initiation of autoimmunity. More generally, endogenous retroelements would mediate both hereditary and spontaneous forms of SLE.
How B cells would be stimulated specifically by DNA has not been solved, but nucleic acids—whether they are introduced from the outside or are cell intrinsic—are key structures sensed by the innate immune system (47). In lupus, both RNA and DNA seem to contribute to the disease, and, as single agents, retroelements provide both, in structures different enough from their cellular counterparts and located in different cellular compartments. In the B/W mouse, the observed hyperproliferation could be explained by stimulation through TLR4 by the envelope of MLV (48). The nucleic acids of MLV may contribute as well. When introduced from the outside, the TLR9 and TLR7 pathways sense CpG-containing DNA and ssRNA, respectively, and these pathways can promote autoantibody formation (49–51). Unfortunately, results in lupus-prone mice have been paradoxical. Despite the absence of anti-DNA Abs in TLR9-deficient MRL/lpr/lpr animals, disease is worsened. In contrast, TLR7 deficiency has no effect on anti-DNA and anti-nucleosome Abs, but clinical disease is partially ameliorated (50). In lupus-prone mice, we note that TLR7 also controls the GC response to exogenous (52) and endogenous (53) MLV (as demonstrated in nonautoimmune mice). But mouse strains with spontaneous autoimmune disease, including NZB, NZW, and MRL/lpr/lpr, produce large amounts of retrovirus even in the presence of TLR7 and TLR9. In NZB mice, for example, there are at least 84 endogenous nonecotropic proviruses, 28 of which are unique to that strain (54).
When the (xenotropic) NZB virus was discovered, investigators hypothesized that it constitutes an autoimmune virus (55) that initiates Abs to RBCs and dsDNA and eventually causes nephritis—similar to that of the B/W mouse, where these symptoms develop faster. However, in experiments with NZB × SWR crosses, virus titers did not correlate with anti-DNA Ab titers or nephritis (56). The results left the immunology community less enthusiastic about the retroelement hypothesis. However, even barring a direct role of MLV in the autoimmune disease, we are still left with the following question: Why is retroviral Ag a preferred autoantigen in diseased B/W mice? There, levels of gp70–Ab complexes are strongly associated with the development of glomerulonephritis (57). Mouse serum gp70 (produced by the liver) is very similar to MLV gp70 and is present in virtually every mouse strain, but only lupus-prone strains produce autoantibodies to (retroviral) gp70 (57). In fact, B/W mice produce Abs to the gp70 of the inducible NZB-X2 MLV (58) that cross-react with endogenous murine gp70. This is not to say that the gp70–Ab complexes necessarily cause the disease, but it shows the importance of MLV as an autoantigen.
Recently, a seminal paper provided a fascinating glimpse of potentially expansive views on autoimmunity (59); it showed how retroelements can stimulate the IFN stimulatory DNA (ISD) response (60), an intracellular DNA-sensing mechanism, which leads to the activation of innate and adaptive immune responses in autoimmune disease. Mice deficient in the DNA exonuclease Trex1 generate ANA and develop glomerulonephritis (61), and most of them die of circulatory failure caused by severe inflammatory myocarditis (62); this is dependent on the type I ISD pathway and IFN-dependent mobilization of lymphocytes (59). In humans, both Aicardi-Goutières syndrome (63) and a cutaneous subtype of SLE called familial chilblain lupus (64) can result from mutations in TREX1. Furthermore, mutations in TREX1 are present in 2.6% of SLE patients, but only 0.1% of control subjects (65). In the cells of the hearts of Trex1-deficient mice, cDNA of endogenous retroviruses and retrotransposons accumulates, and the sera contain autoantibodies to heart tissue. Reverse-transcriptase inhibitors prevent disease in these mice, suggesting that the retroelements contribute to this form of autoimmunity (66). If not properly metabolized, retroelements are potential sources of endogenous nucleic acids that may trigger an antiviral response (67). Similarly, B/W mice treated with a drug that increases the cDNA concentration of MLV succumb to disease earlier than their nontreated littermates (68).
Almost half of the genome of mice and humans consists of retroelements, which include retroviruses and retrotransposons. The biochemical nature of retroelement DNA in the genome is no different from that of the part of the genome that includes classical genes, regulatory RNAs, and intervening sequences, and thus Abs to DNA and RNA will react to retroelement nucleic acids as well. However, apart from being replicated as part of the genome, retroelements also replicate with their own life cycle, which includes infection (for retrovirus), reverse transcription, recombination, and hypermutation. This is important on several counts, as follows: placing viral RNA and DNA into the cytoplasm, where it is sensed by the innate immune system; creating new viruses with different tropism and effector functions; potentially interfering with the expression of activating and tolerizing genes; and creating new (cross-reacting) epitopes.
The special nature of retroelement replication, with its high frequency of mutation and recombination, may also provide an explanation for the strict timeline of the onset of autoimmune disease and death in B/W mice. Unlike an undefined error catastrophe as a result of relentless accumulation of unknown defects in tolerization, the accumulation of mutations (including recombination and hypermutation of the retroviral genome and insertional mutagenesis of the cellular genome) follows a linear timeline. Although stochastic in nature, the large number of events ensures predictability. For example, de novo insertions of MLV in the genome are silenced in cell culture with a strict timeline that depends on the genomic site but is independent of culture conditions (69). In AKR mice, T lymphoma formation is mediated by de novo recombinant (endogenous) MLV and its mutagenic insertions into cellular DNA, yet the time by which 50% of mice are dead can be predicted. The emergence of a mutated Ag would thus satisfy the requisite properties needed to explain both the positive selection and the timeline in the autoimmune response of lupus-prone mice. It may also represent the environmental (somatic) factor needed for the development of disease in human patients, as the concordance rate for lupus among monozygotic twins is only ∼25% (70).
Retroelements are induced by a variety of stimuli, including UV radiation, chemicals, and infection. But what exactly would this retroviral autoantigen be? Because it is not presented by MHC molecules, DNA as an Ag for high-affinity Abs poses a problem that is not relevant to other autoantigens. Proteins associated with the nucleic acids may provide T cell help. But we also cannot exclude the possibility that the reverse transcriptase, with its mutation rate equivalent to that of activation-induced deaminase, generates altered retroviral peptides or peptide mimics of nucleic acids (71). In Fig. 1, we present one of many possibilities of how MLV initiates autoimmunity in B/W mice.
Retroelements are ancient companions of the human genome. Although in healthy persons the vast majority of retroelements are truncated and/or highly mutated and no longer encode functional genes, the most recently active retroviruses that have integrated into the human germline contain intact open reading frames in some or all genes that encode functional proteins expressed in various tissues (72). There are 80–100 retrotransposition-competent LINE-1 elements in an average human being. Remarkably, most of the retrotransposition capability is present in six highly active elements (73). It does not take a great leap of faith to assume that, in some instances, retrotranspositions of such elements in somatic cells will have consequences, causing cancer or autoimmune disease. Furthermore, 38 of 86 LINE-1s are polymorphic in human populations—ample ground for variations in outcome. Lupus patients would have allelic forms of one or several retroelements that are pathogenic. Some may lack a methylase that silences functional retroelements (74). Genome-wide association studies filter out and thus disregard any contribution of repetitive elements, which are, to a great extent, retroelements. But even if the repetitive sequences were not filtered out, it would be difficult to pinpoint a putative retroelement in such studies—the same retroelement need not be responsible for disease in every patient. Studies in lupus-prone families would reduce this complexity.
Finally, there is a well-documented link between lupus and cancer. Human SLE patients have an increased risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (75), and in the B/W mouse there is a concomitant incidence of lupus and lymphoma. In our view, mutated B cells would be responsible for this link. In the B/W mouse, the mutations would be generated by de novo proviral insertions. The requirement for more than one mutation within a given cell may explain why cancer is preceded by autoimmunity, which may be initiated by a single event.
A fundamental unresolved question in autoimmune disease is as follows: What is the driving force? Specifically, what causes the emergence of plasma cells that secrete high-affinity IgG anti-DNA Abs in SLE? In the B/W mice, which develop spontaneous lupus, we did not find any major intrinsic defect in currently known B cell tolerance mechanisms (deletion, anergy, and receptor editing). Instead, in old but not young mice, a GC reaction produces anti-DNA Abs. In the model presented in this work, rather than Abs fortuitously mutating toward DNA specificity, we suggest that a mutated endogenous retrovirus would activate T and B cells. We have sketched an example of how recombinant retroviral epitopes can lead to high-affinity Abs to DNA, helped by the innate immune system. The innate immune receptors are stimulated by retroviral envelope; by unmethylated cDNA released from dying cells; by viral ssRNA and dsRNA of the tRNA priming complex introduced via infection; and by viral DNA in the cytoplasm, where it is sensed as ectopic.
We thank Louis Du Pasquier for discussions, David Nemazee and Tony Marion for critical reading of the manuscript, and Mary McKenney for editing the manuscript.
This work was supported by grants from the Israel Science Foundation, founded by the Academy of Sciences and Humanities (to D.E.); from the National Institutes of Health (R01AI041570) and the Lupus Research Institute (to M.W.); and from the United States–Israel Binational Science Foundation (to M.W. and D.E.).
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.