Understanding the cellular dynamics of Aire-expressing lineage(s) among medullary thymic epithelial cells (AEL-mTECs) is essential for gaining insight into the roles of Aire in establishment of self-tolerance. In this study, we monitored the maturation program of AEL-mTECs by temporal lineage tracing, in which bacterial artificial chromosome transgenic mice expressing tamoxifen-inducible Cre recombinase under control of the Aire regulatory element were crossed with reporter strains. We estimated that the half-life of AEL-mTECs subsequent to Aire expression was ∼7–8 d, which was much longer than that reported previously, owing to the existence of a post-Aire stage. We found that loss of Aire did not alter the overall lifespan of AEL-mTECs, inconsistent with the previous notion that Aire expression in medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs) might result in their apoptosis for efficient cross-presentation of self-antigens expressed by AEL-mTECs. In contrast, Aire was required for the full maturation program of AEL-mTECs, as exemplified by the lack of physiological downregulation of CD80 during the post-Aire stage in Aire-deficient mice, thus accounting for the abnormally increased CD80high mTECs seen in such mice. Of interest, increased CD80high mTECs in Aire-deficient mice were not mTEC autonomous and were dependent on cross-talk with thymocytes. These results further support the roles of Aire in the differentiation program of AEL-mTECs.
Studies of autoimmune disease are hampered by the complex influence of many factors, such as genetics, environmental microbial pathogens, age, and sex, which, either alone or in combination, can contribute to the development and pathogenesis of autoimmunity. For this reason, the mechanisms underlying the autoimmune disease caused by Aire deficiency, a monogenic organ-specific autoimmune disorder, have been a focus of intense research as a relatively simple model of autoimmune pathogenesis (1). Studies of Aire gene function could also help to answer the fundamental question of how the immune system discriminates between self and non-self within the thymic microenvironment. In this context, the discovery of Aire-dependent transcriptional control of a large number of tissue-restricted Ag (TRA) genes from medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs), where Aire is expressed most strongly (2), has created an attractive model suggesting that the primary role of Aire in establishment of self-tolerance is activation of TRA gene expression required for the negative selection of autoreactive T cells. Consequently, this model has encouraged many studies of Aire in an attempt to clarify how the single Aire gene can influence the transcription of such a large number of TRAs within mTECs (3–5).
In comparison with the remarkable changes noted in the expression profiles of TRA genes in Aire-deficient mTECs, morphological alterations in the medullary components from Aire-deficient mice were not initially appreciated. However, fairly recent detailed studies of Aire-deficient thymi have revealed several important aspects of the Aire-dependent differentiation programs of mTECs (6), such as increased numbers of mTECs with a globular cell shape (7, 8) and, in contrast, reduced numbers of terminally differentiated mTECs expressing involucrin, the latter being associated with reduced numbers of Hassall’s corpuscles (8, 9). Although not fully investigated, increased percentages of mTECs expressing CD80 at high levels (CD80high) is another suggested aspect of the Aire-dependent mTEC differentiation program (10–12). All of these findings together illuminate the importance of a full understanding of the Aire-dependent maturation process of the Aire-expressing lineage of medullary thymic epithelial cells (AEL-mTECs). It is noteworthy that the Aire-dependent mTEC differentiation program can be linked with the control of TRA gene expression, in which Aire may play a role from a different viewpoint (6). For example, given that acquisition of the properties of TRA gene expression depends on the maturation status of mTECs (13, 14), any defect in such an Aire-dependent maturation program could also account for defects of TRA gene expression in Aire-deficient mTECs. Thus, a precise understanding of the roles of Aire in mTEC differentiation is essential for clarification of Aire-dependent TRA gene expression and, ultimately, the roles of Aire in establishment of self-tolerance.
Another enigmatic aspect of Aire function is whether Aire exerts any proapoptotic activity within cells. It is believed that mTECs contribute to self-antigen expression by being phagocytosed by professional APCs at the expense of their death (i.e., cross-presentation; Ref. 14). In line with this notion, we have observed that many AEL-mTECs are in close contact with thymic DCs, suggesting efficient cross-presentation of TRAs from AEL-mTECs (15). Nevertheless, the issue of whether Aire itself exerts any proapoptotic activities has not been directly addressed using an in vivo system. The proapoptotic activity of Aire has been deduced in part from the increased proportion of the CD80high mTEC population (in which Aire+ mTECs reside) in Aire-deficient mice, despite the lack of ability by Aire to directly cause proliferative arrest of mTECs (10).
Finally, a conflicting idea has come to light that Aire can either inhibit or promote the differentiation program of AEL-mTECs (6). The inhibition model assumes that only an absence of Aire would reveal the full program of terminal differentiation of AEL-mTECs (16). It is important to note that this model was constructed based partly on the concept of the proposed proapoptotic activity of Aire. In contrast, we have suggested that Aire helps to promote the differentiation program in AEL-mTECs, and this model assumes defective accomplishment of the differentiation program in the absence of Aire, associated with impaired expression of the TRA gene in AEL-mTECs through the mechanisms described above (6, 8).
One important step toward clarifying these issues is to compare the maturation-associated cell signatures and lifespan of AEL-mTECs in either the presence or the absence of Aire, using in vivo models. Although lineage tracing (or fate mapping) is a particularly powerful strategy for this purpose, the conventional approach does not allow us to chase the developmental process of AEL-mTECs because Aire is expressed before emergence of the three germ cell layers, prior to its thymic expression (15). To overcome this problem, we have developed a timing-controlled lineage-tracing system that allows permanent marking of AEL-mTECs with fluorescent proteins. This approach for investigating the cellular dynamics of AEL-mTECs by temporal lineage tracing has revealed many fundamental and previously unknown characteristics of AEL-mTECs.
Materials and Methods
A bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) transgenic (Tg) construct containing 97.1 kb of the 5′ region and 69 kb of the 3′ region flanking the Aire gene was generated from BAC clone RP23-461E7, in which the Aire start codon was replaced with an open reading frame encoding a tamoxifen-inducible Cre recombinase (17) followed by a poly-A signal from the rabbit β globin gene. Aire/CreER BAC Tg mice were generated by injecting a linearized BAC Tg construct into pronuclei of fertilized C57BL/6 oocytes, and Tg founders were chosen by Southern blot analysis. A reporter Tg strain expressing enhanced GFP (EGFP) upon Cre-mediated recombination (CAG-CAT-EGFP, line 39) (18), a knockin Cre reporter strain expressing a tandem-dimer red fluorescent protein (tdRFP) (19), and Aire/GFP knockin mice (8) were generated as described previously. For induction of Cre recombinase activity, mice were given 500 μg tamoxifen dissolved in 50 μl corn oil i.p. for 6 d. The day after that, on which mice received the final dose of tamoxifen, was counted as day 1. Rag2-deficient mice on a C57BL/6 background were purchased from Taconic. All mice were maintained under pathogen-free conditions. The protocols used in this study were in accordance with the Guidelines for Animal Experimentation of Tokushima University School of Medicine, Tokushima, Japan.
Immunohistochemical analysis of the thymus with goat polyclonal anti-GFP Ab (Nobus Biologicals), rabbit polyclonal anti-GFP Ab (Invitrogen), anti–epithelial cell adhesion molecule 1 (EpCAM) mAb (BD), anti-Ly51 mAb (eBioscience), and rat anti-Aire mAb (clone RF33-1) was performed as described previously (8, 15).
TEC preparation and flow cytometric analysis
Preparation of TECs and flow cytometric analysis with a FACScalibur (BD) and a FACSAria II (BD) were performed as described previously (8, 15). The mAbs used were anti-CD45 and anti-CD80, both purchased from eBioscience. Ulex europaeus agglutinin 1 (UEA-1) was from Vector Laboratories. Rat anti-Aire mAb was clone RF33-1 prepared in our laboratory.
Characterization of the post-Aire mTEC differentiation program by temporal lineage tracing
Because of Aire expression in the early embryo, it is impossible to perform lineage tracing of AEL-mTECs with a conventional fate-mapping system (15). We sought to overcome this problem by generating BAC Tg mice expressing tamoxifen-inducible Cre recombinase under control of the Aire regulatory element (Aire/CreER BAC Tg), allowing induction of Cre recombinase activity at will (Fig. 1A). One Aire/CreER BAC Tg line was established, and this was crossed with a reporter Tg strain expressing EGFP (CAG-CAT-EGFP) (18) (Fig. 1A) or tdRFP (19) (not depicted in Fig. 1A) upon Cre-mediated recombination. We first performed immunohistochemistry with anti-GFP Ab to monitor GFP expression in the thymus from double-Tg mice 1 d after tamoxifen treatment. We observed many GFP+ cells that were confined to the thymic medulla (i.e., Ly51− areas) (Fig. 1B), and approximately one- to two-thirds of the cells coexpressed endogenous Aire protein (Fig. 1C). No GFP+ cells were observed in the absence of tamoxifen treatment (data not shown). We also used flow cytometric analysis for detection of GFP signals, together with expression of Aire protein in mTECs at different time points after tamoxifen treatment. Just after tamoxifen treatment, ∼30% of the GFP+ cells expressed endogenous Aire, and these cells were almost exclusively from the CD80high population (Fig. 1D). In contrast, none of the GFP+ cells expressed Aire protein 11 d after tamoxifen treatment, indicating that these cells corresponded to post-Aire mTECs at this later time point. We did not observe any GFP+ cells outside the thymus, including the spleen and lymph nodes, after tamoxifen treatment (Y. Nishikawa and M. Matsumoto, unpublished observations). These results confirmed that we were able to mark the AEL-mTECs reproducibly with this Aire/CreER BAC Tg line to monitor the process of AEL-mTEC maturation.
We then investigated the kinetics of the disappearance of AEL-mTECs from the thymus after tamoxifen treatment by assessing the proportion of GFP+ cells among mTECs on an Aire-sufficient background (Fig. 2A). The proportion of GFP+ cells gradually decreased with time after tamoxifen treatment, and by 3 wk they had almost disappeared from the thymus. Given that transcriptional blockade of the Aire gene in a doxycycline-inducible Aire turnoff Tg system results in the disappearance of Aire+ mTECs over the following 3–5 d (20), it seems reasonable to speculate that the lifespan of Aire protein, once expressed, is < 1 wk. The fact that the total disappearance of AEL-mTECs (GFP+ cells) from the thymus took 3 wk from the initial tamoxifen treatment in our temporal lineage-tracing system suggests that there is a significant post-Aire period (≤2 wk) when AEL-mTECs have terminated Aire gene transcription until they finally disappear from the thymus. We estimated the half-life of AEL-mTECs after activation of Cre recombinase activity to be ∼8 and 7 d using the CAG-CAT-EGFP (Fig. 2A) and tdRFP reporter strains (Fig. 2C), respectively. It is noteworthy that these estimated times were almost twice as long as those reported previously (i.e., 3–4 d) (10), which would not have accounted for the existence of a post-Aire stage for AEL-mTECs because anti-Aire Ab was used for monitoring.
Dispensable role of Aire in inducing apoptosis of AEL-mTECs
A model has been suggested in which Aire concomitantly induces apoptosis in mTECs, thereby promoting cross-presentation of TRAs targeted by the transcriptional activity of Aire (10). However, our previous fate-mapping study revealed the existence of a post-Aire stage (15), and our present data show that in fact it is rather long, raising a question about the proapoptotic activity of Aire. To clarify this issue more directly, we compared the survival time of AEL-mTECs from Aire-sufficient and Aire-deficient mice, using the temporal lineage-tracing system described above, anticipating that if Aire has any proapoptotic activity, then the lifespan of AEL-mTECs would be prolonged by Aire deficiency within the cells. For this purpose, we further introduced an Aire-deficient background onto Aire/CreER BAC Tg crossed with CAG-CAT-EGFP. It was found that the half-life of AEL-mTECs showed no difference between an Aire-sufficient (i.e., 8.0 d estimated from Fig. 2A) and an Aire-deficient background (i.e., 8.7 d estimated from Fig. 2B), suggesting a lack of any obvious proapoptotic activity of Aire; throughout the observation period, we observed higher percentages of GFP+ cells among the mTECs in an Aire-deficient background than was the case for those from an Aire-sufficient background. We speculate that this finding may reflect the augmented and/or prolonged transcriptional activity of the Aire locus in the absence of Aire itself, both resulting in higher efficiency of Cre-mediated recombination of the GFP reporter. No obvious alteration in the lifespan kinetics of AEL-mTECs resulting from lack of Aire was demonstrated by crossing Aire/CreER BAC Tg onto the tdRFP reporter strain, in which the effect was compared between heterozygous (i.e., 6.8 d, estimated from Fig. 2C) and homozygous Aire deficiency (i.e., 6.1 d, estimated from Fig. 2D). Thus, Aire itself seems to be irrelevant for efficient cross-presentation through its induction of apoptosis within AEL-mTECs.
Altered differentiation program of AEL-mTECs in the absence of Aire
Alteration of the differentiation program of AEL-mTECs in Aire-deficient mice has been suggested from the phenotypic changes exhibited by the mTECs, including increased numbers of cells with a globular shape (7, 8) and reduced numbers of terminally differentiated mTECs expressing involucrin, in association with reduced numbers of Hassall’s corpuscles (8, 9). However, a more quantitatively noticeable change in the Aire-deficient thymic stroma was an increase of mTECs with a mature signature, expressing CD80 and MHC-II at high levels (10–12). Aire-deficient mice have an increased proportion and/or number of mTECs with high CD80 and MHC-II expression (i.e., mTEChigh), despite the fact that Aire does not have a direct impact on the division of mTECs, thus leading to the hypothesis that Aire has proapoptotic activity (10). However, the exact mechanism responsible for this phenotype remains unknown. We investigated the mechanisms underlying the possible link between increased CD80high mTECs in Aire-deficient mice and alteration of the differentiation program of AEL-mTECs lacking Aire.
We first examined which type of cell, the Aire-expressing or non–Aire-expressing mTEC, is responsible for the increase of CD80high mTECs. We used Aire/GFP knockin mice, because this strain allows us to discriminate between Aire-expressing and non–Aire-expressing lineages even on an Aire-deficient background (8). We assessed the expression of CD80 together with GFP after gating for CD45−EpCAM+UEA-1+ mTECs. To exclude any gene-dosage effect of the GFP-expressing allele, we made a comparison between mice with the +/gfp (Aire+/gfp) and −/gfp (Aire−/gfp) genotypes. As reported previously (10–12) and exemplified in Fig. 3A, the total percentages of CD80high mTECs were increased in Aire-deficient Aire−/gfp mice. Notably, this increase was not observed in the GFP+CD80high (Aire-expressing) population, but in the GFP−CD80high (non–Aire-expressing) population (Fig. 3A, Fig. 3B). This finding was rather unexpected because Aire+ mTECs are a CD80high population, and we had anticipated that, conversely, the increased percentages of CD80high mTECs would have been made up of cell lineages expressing Aire.
Given that increased CD80high mTECs in Aire-deficient mice were made up predominantly of non–Aire-expressing mTECs (including post-Aire mTECs), we suspected that these CD80high mTECs from Aire-deficient mice might, for some reason, contain mTECs at the post-Aire stage, which normally exhibit downregulation of CD80 and MHC-II in the presence of Aire (15). Indeed, when the expression levels of CD80 were monitored after tamoxifen treatment in double-Tg mice (i.e., Aire/CreER BAC Tg crossed with CAG-CAT-EGFP), we found that they remained high during the observation period on an Aire-deficient background, whereas they gradually declined on an Aire-sufficient background (Fig. 3C). These results suggested that, in Aire-deficient mice, CD80 is abnormally sustained at a high level during the differentiation program of AEL-mTECs after Aire expression has been terminated (i.e., in the post-Aire stage). A similar pattern was observed when we examined the expression levels of MHC-II at the post-Aire stage (data not shown).
To further confirm that the increase in the number of CD80high mTECs in Aire-deficient mice is due to lack of physiological downregulation of CD80 during the post-Aire stage, we applied the tamoxifen-inducible lineage-tracing system to Aire+/gfp mice, in which Aire gene transcription can be monitored by GFP expression on a real-time basis (8); we further introduced the Aire+/gfp allele into Aire/CreER BAC Tg crossed with the tdRFP reporter strain (Fig. 4A). In this system, GFP+ cells (with active Aire gene transcription) should also express the tamoxifen-responsive Cre gene derived from the Aire/CreER BAC Tg allele, but the recombination activity of Cre for turning on the tdRFP signal becomes active only after tamoxifen treatment (see Fig. 2C and Fig. 2D for RFP expression from triple-Tg mice [i.e., Aire/CreER BAC Tg crossed with tdRFP reporter and Aire/GFP knockin mice]). Once exposed to tamoxifen, GFP+ cells start to express the RFP signal and become GFP+RFP+ cells, and this condition persists until Aire gene transcription ceases (Fig. 4A). Eventually, the transcriptional activity of Aire will be lost (i.e., entry into the post-Aire stage), and the cells then become GFP−RFP+ cells. Thus, in this experimental setting, AEL-mTECs can be recognized according to the sequence of their maturation in the order (GFP+RFP−), GFP+RFP+, and GFP−RFP+.
We first validated this experimental system by assessing the fluorescence characteristics of AEL-mTECs at different time points after tamoxifen treatment. After tamoxifen treatment, we observed AEL-mTECs exhibiting all three fluorescence combinations in an Aire-sufficient (Aire+/gfp) background (Fig. 4B). It was noteworthy that more GFP+RFP+ cells than GFP−RFP+ cells were observed among tamoxifen-responsive RFP+ cells at an early stage of evaluation (1.3 versus 0.3% on day 3: Fig. 4B, top left), whereas we observed more GFP−RFP+ cells than GFP+RFP+ cells 11 d after tamoxifen treatment (0.4 versus 0.2% on day 11: Fig. 4B, top right), suggesting progressive maturation of AEL-mTECs with time. We then focused on the level of CD80 expression in GFP−RFP+ cells, corresponding to mTECs at the post-Aire stage, from both an Aire-sufficient (Aire+/gfp) and an Aire-deficient (Air−/gfp) background. As a control, we evaluated the level of CD80 expression in GFP+RFP− cells, representing an initial stage of Aire expression. We found that GFP+RFP− cells from both Aire+/gfp and Aire−/gfp mice showed similar levels of CD80 expression throughout the analysis (i.e., at days 3 and 11 after tamoxifen treatment) (Fig. 4C). However, when we focused on the level of CD80 expression in GFP−RFP+ cells at 11 d after tamoxifen treatment, when most of the RFP-labeled AEL-mTECs would have been at the post-Aire stage, the level of CD80 expression in cells from Aire−/gfp mice was significantly higher than that of cells from Aire+/gfp mice (Fig. 4C, Fig. 4D). These CD80-sustaining post-Aire mTECs from Aire-deficient mice can be recognized as CD80high mTECs, as observed in Fig. 3A. Thus, the increase of CD80high mTECs in Aire-deficient mice was due to accumulation of cells, abnormally sustaining their expression of CD80high, even at the post-Aire stage. These results further support our hypothesis that lack of Aire has an impact on the differentiation program of AEL-mTECs.
Cross-talk with mature thymocytes is required for the Aire-dependent differentiation program of AEL-mTECs
The program of mTEC maturation is influenced by many factors derived from developing thymocytes (e.g., TNF receptor family ligands, growth factors) (13). We examined whether cross-talk with thymocytes is required for the Aire-dependent differentiation program of AEL-mTECs described above. For this purpose, we investigated whether the increase of CD80high mTECs in Aire-deficient mice would occur even in the absence of mature thymocytes by generating mice deficient in both Aire and Rag2. The proportions of CD80high mTECs were much lower on a Rag2-deficient background (Fig. 5), being consistent with the much lower numbers of AEL-mTECs in Rag2-deficient mice (8). We found that the proportions of CD80high mTECs were indistinguishable between Aire-sufficient and Aire-deficient mice on a Rag2-deficient background, suggesting that the differentiation program of AEL-mTECs may not be absolutely mTEC autonomous with regard to Aire dependency. Instead, cross-talk with mature thymocytes might also play an important role in the Aire-dependent differentiation program of AEL-mTECs.
Our temporal lineage-tracing approach has enabled us to assess precisely the kinetic properties of AEL-mTECs, including their half-life subsequent to Aire expression (i.e., 7–8 d) and the length of the post-Aire stage (≤2 wk). Our approach has also helped to clarify a number of fundamental and previously unsolved issues related to AEL-mTECs, as follows. We found that Aire plays a neutral role in the induction of cell death among AEL-mTECs, although the roles of Aire in other aspects of cross-presentation per se (e.g., transfer of TRAs from AEL-mTECs to bone marrow–APC and/or the ability of bone marrow–APCs to present TRAs) need to be explored further. We also clarified the mechanisms responsible for the increase of CD80high mTECs in Aire-deficient mice, which were found to reflect another defect in the differentiation program of AEL-mTECs resulting from lack of Aire.
We have demonstrated that the increase in the number of CD80high mTECs in Aire-deficient mice was due, at least in part, to lack of physiological downregulation of CD80 during the post-Aire stage. This finding was first obtained by monitoring the levels of CD80 expression in gross lineage-traced cells at different time points after tamoxifen treatment (Fig. 3C). We then introduced the Aire+/gfp allele into Aire/CreER BAC Tg crossed with the tdRFP reporter strain to focus on the genuine post-Aire mTECs (i.e., GFP−RFP+ cells in Fig. 4), because GFP+ cells in the initial analysis might also have included AEL-mTECs still possessing the Aire protein (as exemplified at day 1 in Fig. 1D). Although alterations in the ratios of GFP+RFP+ to GFP−RFP+ cells at different time points justified this experimental system, the lack of any discernible increase of GFP−RFP+ cells (from 0.3 to 0.4%) from day 3 to day 11, compared with the significant decrease of GFP+RFP+ cells (from 1.3 to 0.2%), also suggested a loss of GFP−RFP+ cells during the assay: post-Aire mTECs might be susceptible to death attributable to their physiological lifetime, and we suspect that some of the GFP−RFP+ cells might have already died and thus escaped from the analysis, especially at later time points. Obviously, post-Aire mTECs are a heterogeneous population, but the currently available fate-mapping approach does not allow us to discriminate each type of post-Aire mTEC for evaluation depending on the period traced. Accordingly, we analyzed the lineage-traced cells as a homogenous population by changing the time points of observation. We consider that development of novel experimental systems might be required to overcome some of the technical limitations of the current fate-mapping approach, thereby clarifying the dynamic nature of AEL-mTECs individually.
The defective physiological downregulation of CD80 at the post-Aire stage in the absence of Aire, as demonstrated in the current study, together with the reduced numbers of mTECs with mature signatures (8, 9), strongly suggests that Aire is a differentiation-promoting factor rather than one that inhibits the differentiation of AEL-mTECs (6). Given that the lifespan of AEL-mTECs remained unchanged in the absence of Aire, the present results suggest that Aire-deficient AEL-mTECs are lost from the thymus if the maturation signature is incomplete. However, the exact point in the differentiation process at which Aire-deficient mTECs are prevented from differentiating further still remains unclear. Investigation of this issue has been hampered by the current lack of suitable markers for the mTEC differentiation program: so far, CD80 and MHC-II remain the few that are available, and Aire expression may now be added to this profile. Precise elucidation of the target gene(s) relevant to the progression of mTEC differentiation controlled by Aire is an essential task to achieve a full understanding of the roles of Aire in the differentiation program of AEL-mTECs. From a broader viewpoint, future work will need to focus on how the Aire-dependent differentiation program of mTECs contributes to the generation of a tolerogenic thymic microenvironment.
Recently, Metzger et al. (21) developed a similar tamoxifen-inducible fate-mapping system, and confirmed the existence of a post-Aire stage. They found that the half-life of AEL-mTECs was longer than previously thought, as we have demonstrated in the current study. Of interest, their study also showed that Aire+ mTECs had highly regenerative potential, and that the process depended on RANK signaling, as has been suggested for the production and/or maintenance of Aire+ mTECs (9, 22). Furthermore, they reported that the spectrum of TRA genes expressed by post-Aire mTECs was different from that of mTECs with ongoing Aire expression, as suggested previously (9). Thus, the unique properties of post-Aire mTECs in establishing self-tolerance need to be investigated further.
Finally, we found that the increased proportions of CD80high mTECs in Aire-deficient mice were absent on a Rag2-deficient background. The results may suggest that thymocytes (at stages later than double-negative 4), under physiological conditions, provide certain undefined signals that make AEL-mTECs dependent on Aire for their full maturation program. Alternatively, Aire-dependent thymocyte development, as exemplified by the reduced numbers of terminally differentiated single-positive thymocytes in Aire-deficient mice on a Rag2-sufficient background (23), may in turn affect the differentiation program of AEL-mTECs. Thus, some of the unique features of mTECs in Aire-deficient mice are not mTEC autonomous, but cross-talk with mature thymocytes is required for the Aire-dependent differentiation program of AEL-mTECs.
We thank Drs. Jun-ichi Miyazaki and Hiroshi Kawamoto for CAG-CAT-EGFP mice and Dr. Shohei Hori for tdRFP mice.
This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, and CREST, the Japan Science Technology Agency (to M.M.).
Abbreviations used in this article:
Aire-expressing lineage of medullary thymic epithelial cell
bacterial artificial chromosome
epithelial cell adhesion molecule 1
medullary thymic epithelial cell
tandem-dimer red fluorescent protein
Ulex europaeus agglutinin 1.
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.