Skip to Main Content
Table III.

Homozygosity for the G2M*n allele and the GM*b;f;n haplotype confers resistance to invasive infection in C2D

G2M AllotypebG2M(n,n)G2M(n,n−)G2M(n−,n−)
GM Haplotype*b;f;n/b;f;n*b;f;n/g;a;n*b;f;n/*b;f;n*n/n*b;f;n−/g;a;n*g;a;n−/g;a;n*b;f;n −/*b;f;n
Group 1 (n = 12) 7c 2d 0d 1e 
Group 2 (n = 7)  
Group 3 (n = 12)  
Group 4 (n = 13)  
Total (n = 44) 20.9% 37.2% 16.3%  18.6% 2.3% 4.7% 
Controls (n = 430)f 19.3% 27.2% 17.4%  17.7% 9.8% 6.7% 
G2M AllotypebG2M(n,n)G2M(n,n−)G2M(n−,n−)
GM Haplotype*b;f;n/b;f;n*b;f;n/g;a;n*b;f;n/*b;f;n*n/n*b;f;n−/g;a;n*g;a;n−/g;a;n*b;f;n −/*b;f;n
Group 1 (n = 12) 7c 2d 0d 1e 
Group 2 (n = 7)  
Group 3 (n = 12)  
Group 4 (n = 13)  
Total (n = 44) 20.9% 37.2% 16.3%  18.6% 2.3% 4.7% 
Controls (n = 430)f 19.3% 27.2% 17.4%  17.7% 9.8% 6.7% 
a

The G2M(n) and G2M(n−) allotypes and the associated GM haplotypes are given in the C2D patients, who were divided into groups according to the severity of the infections (see Table I).

b

In 40 patients, confirmatory investigation of G2Mn and G2Mn− was performed by DNA analysis.

c

p < 0.001 (Fisher’s exact test) for the homozygous presence of G2M(n) in group 1 compared with groups 2–4.

d

As compared with the GMb;f;n− haplotype, the increased prevalence of the GMg;a;n− haplotype among heterozygous patients with noninvasive infections was not statistically significant (p = 0.15, Mann-Whitney U test).

e

One patient could only be analyzed for G2M(n) due to lack of serum.

f

The distribution of GM haplotypes in the C2D cohort did not differ (p = 0.72, CHI2 test) from that found in a previously described control population (22 ).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal